Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de
wrote:
Hi Dave,
On Dec 20, 2013, at 19:01 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
I wanted to say how much I was enjoying catching up on this thread.
I think only one question came up for
I wanted to say how much I was enjoying catching up on this thread.
I think only one question came up for me during it, which is support
for a bfifo and pfifo qdisc? (if I missed something let me know )
Support for these are darn useful for the research and I have long
meant to fold in the
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Dave,
On Dec 20, 2013, at 19:01 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
I wanted to say how much I was enjoying catching up on this thread.
I think only one question came up for me during it, which is support
for
Aggh! the unaligned instructions are Baack? That would explain a lot.
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Dave,
On Dec 20, 2013, at 19:01 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
I wanted to say how much I was enjoying catching up on this thread.
On 19/12/13 13:13, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
Hi Fred,
On Dec 19, 2013, at 12:32 , Fred Stratton fredstrat...@imap.cc wrote:
On 19/12/13 11:31, Fred Stratton wrote:
3 comments.
Presumably you want these changes for some future use of the interface by a
wider audience, rather than current
Hi David,
On Dec 18, 2013, at 05:34 , David Lang da...@lang.hm wrote:
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013, Rich Brown wrote:
- From what you’ve said, I don’t have much hope for doing it automagically.
But maybe we can provide clues to help the customer do to the right thing.
Perhaps the first dropdown
Hi Fred,
On Dec 18, 2013, at 12:27 , Fred Stratton fredstrat...@imap.cc wrote:
VDSL2 uses PTM.
This is what I understand from the available information as well. Also
I think that even VDSL1 typically uses PTM, but my knowledge in these matters
is quite limited, (I am neither a telco
That does make things clearer. I was conflating FTTC and FTTH, as I was
making an incorrect assumption about FTTH terminal equipment.
I probably should now run your script at some point to determine which
overhead value I should use.
On 18/12/13 11:59, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
Hi Fred,
Hi Sebastian,
Perhaps we could extend the Interface configuration page to add a “Link uses
DSL/ADSL:” checkbox right below the Protocol dropdown. Default would be off,
but when customers go to the GE00 interface to enter their PPPoE/PPPoATM/ISP
credentials, they’d see this additional
Hi Sebastian,
And while trying to make an intelligent guess, I wonder how to map
none/tc_stab into DSL and/or ATM; if adsl is the same as DSL;
No ADLS is one out of a family of xDSLs (digital subscriber lines). As
far as I know SDSL does not use ATM, VDSL1 might use ATM and all ADSL
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013, Rich Brown wrote:
- From what you’ve said, I don’t have much hope for doing it automagically.
But maybe we can provide clues to help the customer do to the right thing.
Perhaps the first dropdown could be “Link Layer Adjustments (used on DSL or
ATM)” with options for
Hi Rich,
On Dec 16, 2013, at 14:45 , Rich Brown richb.hano...@gmail.com wrote:
Dave, List,
+ hopefully nasty interface initialization bug fixed
http://www.bufferbloat.net/issues/437
In a one-out-of-one test, this build causes all six wireless interfaces to
start up: CEROwrt (and
Most work here also. I have babel turned off at present.
SM worked until 0300 CET crafting the AQM lua interface. The result is
clearer IMHO. The balance is about right. Thank you.
DT recrafted the wifi script after visiting the cinema. I wonder if
3.10.24-5 is the precursor to Mordor builds
13 matches
Mail list logo
