On Fri, 1 Feb 2019, David Lang wrote:
I had high hopes for these, but the driver development is not working
well, it's one guy at Marvell who does it in his spare time, nobody else
has the info to be able to work on it.
It's the wifi you're worried about? I've read about people having
On Fri, 1 Feb 2019, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Fri, 1 Feb 2019, Matt Taggart wrote:
Anyone else have inexpensive, better cpu, and 802.11ac capable
replacements for WNDR3800?
Used WRT1200AC, WRT1900ACv2 or WRT1900ACS.
I had high hopes for these, but the driver development is not working
> On 1 Feb, 2019, at 9:14 pm, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>
> Otherwise I hear a lot about the TP-LINK Archer C7 as some kind of "reference
> stable OpenWrt platform".
The IQrouter is physically an Archer C7 with a customised OpenWRT build and a
sticker covering the TPlink logo. I'm not sure
On Fri, 1 Feb 2019, Matt Taggart wrote:
Anyone else have inexpensive, better cpu, and 802.11ac capable
replacements for WNDR3800?
Used WRT1200AC, WRT1900ACv2 or WRT1900ACS.
Anything with Marvell Armada 385 makes for a wonderful CPU based
forwarding platform. I have WRT1200AC myself (but I
On 2/1/19 8:28 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
> I haven't had to touch sqm personally for years now, and I'd like to
> thank everybody for keeping the package updated and relevant.
Yes it's great! I was pleasantly surprised the other day when switching
a WNDR3800 from using fq_codel+simple to
from:
https://www.reddit.com/r/openwrt/comments/alw2zo/openwrt_sounds_interesting_what_are_the_biggest/
"My primary reason for using OpenWRT is SQM. The cable connection from
my ISP is horribly prone to bufferbloat. When the link is saturated,
my devices would practically lose connectivity
