Hi Dave,
On Feb 7, 2014, at 19:43 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Dave,
On Feb 7, 2014, at 18:57 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Stephen Hemminger
step
. From the
linux machine sitting in cero's se00 subnet, neither of these work.
(and take this public please, I'm terribly buried right now)
Oops, sorry Dave. I will try to keep this public.
Best Regards
sebastian
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Sebastian Moeller moell
This was taken private, but probably could be of interest to other users, so on
Dave's request:
Begin forwarded message:
From: Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de
Subject: Re: ipv6 over DT
Date: February 7, 2014 19:01:43 GMT+01:00
To: Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com
Cc: Mikael Abrahamsson swm
Hi Dave,
On Feb 10, 2014, at 18:48 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
Despite success with a variety of devices in increasing cerowrt's
multicast rate from 1mbit to 9, I have found two that can't handle it,
notably an older android tablet (the original nexus 7), and an iwl
wifi card.
HI Dave,
On Feb 17, 2014, at 20:36 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
-1) we are working on modernizing, replicating and securing key bits of the
bufferbloat.net infrastructure.
0) I would like to push the sqm scripts and gui up to openwrt-devel
for review soon. It's still missing some
HI Dave,
On Feb 19, 2014, at 17:29 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:11 AM, David Personette dper...@gmail.com wrote:
I installed 3.10.28-12, and other than some missing packages (bash and curl
Heh. What do you guys do, have a cron job polling for changes to
Hi Dave,
On Feb 19, 2014, at 21:43 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
don't use 3.10.28-12 with the usb stick. Found a bug with codepoints.
Building 3.10.28-14 now.
Ah, okay, will wait for -14..
best regards
Sebastian
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Sebastian
Hi Dave,
On Feb 20, 2014, at 00:29 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
Get it at:
Already installed ;) (rebooting just now, as I made all my changes and
want my rc.local run..)
http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/cerowrt/wndr/3.10.28-14/
+ all known instruction traps
Hi Fred,
On Feb 20, 2014, at 06:28 , Fred Stratton fredstrat...@imap.cc wrote:
http://www.vwlowen.co.uk/internet/files.htm#routerstatslite
is software that is useful for monitoring an ADSL connection. When 'speed
has increased' is mentioned, I wonder what has happened to the downstream
fully endorse that! Monitoring the DSL statistics is a good practice
(I would love doing it again, but my current modem-router has no meaning flu
way of doing that…)
Best Regards
Sebastian
On 20/02/14 09:05, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
Hi Fred,
On Feb 20, 2014, at 06:28 , Fred
of RF interferes is a black art…
Best Regards
Sebastian
On 20/02/14 13:15, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
Hi Fred,
On Feb 20, 2014, at 12:35 , Fred Stratton fredstrat...@imap.cc wrote:
On 20/02/14 11:35, Fred Stratton wrote:
I am aware of the DSLStats executable produced
Hi Dave,
On Feb 20, 2014, at 18:49 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
My take on any speedup seen with 3.10.28-14 is due to killing nearly
all the instruction traps.
root@nacktmulle:~# uptime
21:08:53 up 20:28, load average: 0.08, 0.04, 0.05
root@nacktmulle:~# cat
/02/14 20:08, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
Hi Fred,
On Feb 20, 2014, at 18:24 , Fred Stratton fredstrat...@imap.cc wrote:
Aha.. beyond the DSLAM...
I was unaware of that BRAS PPPoE issue.
And there is no good reason to be aware of that particular screw-up :)
Before using the 2Wire, I
, Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de wrote:
HI Dave,
On Feb 17, 2014, at 20:36 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
-1) we are working on modernizing, replicating and securing key bits of the
bufferbloat.net infrastructure.
0) I would like to push the sqm scripts and gui up to openwrt-devel
Hi Vincent,
On Feb 24, 2014, at 11:05 , Vincent Frentzel zcec...@c3r.es wrote:
I could be totally out for lunch here, but shouldn't that be se00
(secure ethernet) instead of eth0.1? At least on 3.10.28-14 neuter ifconfig
nor /etc/config/network mentions eth0.1 at all. Could
Hi Vincent,
On Feb 24, 2014, at 12:35 , Vincent Frentzel zcec...@c3r.es wrote:
I am familiar with that command :) Was wondering if there was something I
could do when I cannot ssh into the router. As mentioned above, when trying
to configure the bridge I hit a point where I could nt get in
Hi Rich,
On Feb 24, 2014, at 15:36 , Rich Brown richb.hano...@gmail.com wrote:
CeroWrt 3.10.28-14 is doing a good job of keeping latency low. But... it has
two other effects:
- I don't get the full 7 mbps down, 768 kbps up as touted by my DSL
provider (Fairpoint). In fact, CeroWrt
Hi Rich,
On Feb 24, 2014, at 22:54 , Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Rich,
On Feb 24, 2014, at 15:36 , Rich Brown richb.hano...@gmail.com wrote:
CeroWrt 3.10.28-14 is doing a good job of keeping latency low. But... it has
two other effects:
- I don't get the full 7
Hi Oliver,
On Feb 25, 2014, at 12:14 , Oliver Niesner oliver.nies...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi list,
I use cerowrt (3.10.24-8) direct behind my main dsl Router.
SQM is set and performance is good.
This is the most important part; you seem happy with the actual latency
under load.
Hi Rich,
On Feb 25, 2014, at 14:09 , Rich Brown richb.hano...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks everyone for all the good advice. I will summarize my responses to all
your notes now, then I'll go away and run more tests.
- Yes, I am using netperf 2.6.0 and netperf-wrapper from Toke's github repo.
Hi Maciej,
On Feb 25, 2014, at 15:05 , Maciej Soltysiak mac...@soltysiak.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de wrote:
TL:DR version, netalyzr probes a buffer depth that while existing has
not much relevance on the latency behavior under load
Hi Dave,
On Feb 25, 2014, at 16:54 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 5:37 AM, Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Rich,
On Feb 25, 2014, at 14:09 , Rich Brown richb.hano...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks everyone for all the good advice. I will summarize
by the homenet working group as the way forward (yea!)
The last patches for dnsmasq landed last week and simon tells me he
plans a stable release soon.
All this sounds quite promising…
Best Regards
Sebastian
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:17 PM, Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi
On Mar 21, 2014, at 23:53 , Toke Høiland-Jørgensen t...@toke.dk wrote:
Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de writes:
I did not notice this even though my primary router furnishes
cerowrt with 192.168.2.104 (but no additional subnets in there), the
internet works and I can reach machines
Hi Toke,
On Mar 22, 2014, at 12:08 , Toke Høiland-Jørgensen t...@toke.dk wrote:
Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de writes:
I have a question about the reasoning behind the whole thing though. I
can see that not permitting source addresses that do not belong to
cerowrt's subnets makes a ton
Hi List,
On Mar 25, 2014, at 17:35 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
I suggest renaming it to something like bloattest, to avoid copyright
and trademark issues. If you can come up with a sexier name,
goferit... (I have had a name in hiding for a while, lul - latency
under load,
you
Dear List,
I can report another wifi issue with cerowrt 3.10.32-12. This time dhcp on the
sw00 radio failed (see dmesg and log read below). Note the TX DMA failures are
from rrul tests from days ago. But MAC Hang: 5359 show that something on the
2.4 GHz radio is not in its happy place (but
Hi List,
I just stumbled over the successor of the geode based a lix boards:
http://www.pcengines.ch/apu1c.htm
from the specs:
• CPU: AMD G series T40E, 1 GHz dual Bobcat core with 64 bit support, 32K data
+ 32K instruction + 512K L2 cache per core
• DRAM: 2 or 4 GB DDR3-1066 DRAM
• Storage:
Hi Valdis,
On Apr 10, 2014, at 18:40 , valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:06:25 +0100, Robert Bradley said:
Try using TFTP with the *factory.img file instead, since that worked for me.
I'd like to at least try to figure out why the sysupgrade path is busted
before I
Hi Dave,
On Apr 10, 2014, at 19:29 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Robert Bradley
robert.bradl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/04/2014 15:32, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
Robert Bradley robert.bradl...@gmail.com writes:
- I had to add my cable modem
Hi Jim,
On Apr 13, 2014, at 02:22 , Jim Reisert AD1C jjreis...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
Hi Valdis,
On Apr 10, 2014, at 18:40 , valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:06:25 +0100, Robert Bradley said:
Try using TFTP
Hi Joel,
On Apr 13, 2014, at 15:57 , Joel Stanley j...@jms.id.au wrote:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 5:58 AM, Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de wrote:
I think Valdis Kletnieks reported the same for a 3800. Please try the
manual route described below and report back your results to the list:
I
Hi Dave,
On Apr 19, 2014, at 19:57 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
The features of the PowerBoost feature are well documented at this
point. A proper
emulation of them is in the ns2 code. It has been a persistent feature
request, to
add support to some Linux rate shaper to properly
Hi Dave,
On Apr 19, 2014, at 22:01 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
+ felix's wifi patch for bug #442 added
please break wifi.
+ debloat qlens reduced again to 12 for be and bk wifi queues
+ heartbleed fix from -3 forward
I note that nearly every secured-by-openssl network
Hi Dave,
On Apr 21, 2014, at 21:09 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Dave,
On Apr 19, 2014, at 22:01 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
+ felix's wifi patch for bug #442 added
please break wifi
Hi Dave,
On Apr 21, 2014, at 21:42 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Dave,
On Apr 21, 2014, at 21:09 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Sebastian Moeller moell
Hi Rich,
so I run this (saved as a script on cerowrt):
#! /bin/sh
# a collection of diagnostics to take when wifi troubles arise:
out_fqn=/tmp/wifi_debug_output.txt
radio=phy0
wlan_if=sw00
#ath9k_sub_dis=(interrupt queues xmit recv reset)
echo -e date ${out_fqn}
date ${out_fqn}
echo -e \n
Hi Dave,
thanks for the information.
On Apr 27, 2014, at 18:15 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi List, hi Dave,
so I had to restart cerowrt 3.10.36-6 today after coming home from a 5 day
trip. I had some
Hi Dave,
On May 7, 2014, at 21:28 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
http://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeMAX-Beta/Testing-fq-codel-in-v1-5-0beta1/m-p/828626/highlight/false#M3978
according to that script...
It turns out that ifb names can be symbolic rather than an integer,
and thus a
Hi Aristar,
On May 9, 2014, at 18:17 , Aristar leetminiwh...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay I figured it out. It was DNSSEC I didn't realize it was enabled
by default so I had to comment out the lines in /etc/dnsmasq.conf but
I still had to manually specify a nameservers in a separate config
under
Hi Maciej, hi list,
\
On May 19, 2014, at 09:30 , Maciej Soltysiak mac...@soltysiak.com wrote:
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 6:48 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2014 23:36:11 -0700, Dave Taht said:
Hi Dave, hi list,
On May 19, 2014, at 18:29 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 2:57 AM, Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Maciej, hi list,
\
On May 19, 2014, at 09:30 , Maciej Soltysiak mac...@soltysiak.com wrote:
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 5:29 PM
Hi R, hi List,
On May 24, 2014, at 16:12 , R. red...@gmail.com wrote:
I should point out that another issue with deploying fq_codel widely is
that it requires an accurate measurement (currently) of the providers
bandwidth.
Pardon my noobiness, but is there a technical obstacle that
Hi Michael,
On Jun 30, 2014, at 17:37 , Michael Richardson m...@sandelman.ca wrote:
Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de wrote:
Bell Canada and nortel ATM equipment is involved.
Oh, that would be quite interesting vdsl2 and atm at the same
time. Could you by chance post the status page
Hi Michael,
On Jul 2, 2014, at 22:45 , Michael Richardson m...@sandelman.ca wrote:
Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Michael,
On Jun 30, 2014, at 17:37 , Michael Richardson m...@sandelman.ca wrote:
Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de wrote:
Bell Canada and nortel ATM
Hi List, hi Dave,
I just had a case of devices on the 2.4GHz radio not connecting anymore (the
5GHz radio still worked).
This output was stable while the devices failed to obtain IP addresses:
root@nacktmulle:/usr/lib/CeroWrtScripts# cat
/sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phy0/ath9k/queues
\(VO):
, Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Neil,
On Jul 25, 2014, at 14:24 , Neil Davies neil.dav...@pnsol.com wrote:
Rich
I have a deep worry over this style of single point measurement - and hence
speed - as an appropriate measure.
But how do you propose to measure
Hi Neil,
On Jul 25, 2014, at 16:27 , Neil Davies neil.dav...@pnsol.com wrote:
Sebastian
On 25 Jul 2014, at 15:17, Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de wrote:
But how do you propose to measure the (bottleneck) link capacity then?
It turns out for current CPE and CMTS/DSLAM equipment
, thanks a lot.
best regards
sebastian
On 25 Jul 2014, at 18:12, Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de wrote:
Hello Martin,
thanks a lot.
On Jul 25, 2014, at 18:32 , Martin Geddes m...@martingeddes.com wrote:
So what is ΔQ and how do you compute it (to the extent it is a computed
Hi Wes,
On Jul 25, 2014, at 22:48 , Wes Felter w...@felter.org wrote:
The Netgear stock firmware measures bandwidth on every boot or link up (not
sure which) and I would suggest doing the same for CeroWRT.
Do you need to measure Internet bandwidth or last mile bandwidth?
I think
Hi David,
On Jul 25, 2014, at 22:57 , David Lang da...@lang.hm wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014, Wes Felter wrote:
The Netgear stock firmware measures bandwidth on every boot or link up (not
sure which) and I would suggest doing the same for CeroWRT.
Do you need to measure Internet bandwidth
Hi David,
On Jul 25, 2014, at 23:03 , David Lang da...@lang.hm wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:37:34 -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Sat, 24 May 2014 10:02:53 -0400, R. said:
Further, this function could be auto-scheduled or made enabled on
router boot up.
Yeah, if such a thing
Hi Valdis,
On Jul 26, 2014, at 00:29 , valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:20:53 -0700, David Lang said:
cost of bandwidth for this is just something to get someone to pay for
(ideally
someone with tons of bandwidth already who won't notice this sort of test,
even
if
of this in public, which is an
ongoing process.
Martin
On 25 July 2014 16:58, Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Martin,
thanks for the pointers,
On Jul 25, 2014, at 16:25 , Martin Geddes m...@martingeddes.com
wrote:
You may find the following useful background
Hi David,
On Jul 26, 2014, at 23:14 , David Lang da...@lang.hm wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2014, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
On Jul 26, 2014, at 22:21 , David Lang da...@lang.hm wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2014, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
On Jul 25, 2014, at 22:57 , David Lang da...@lang.hm wrote
Hi David,
On Jul 26, 2014, at 22:53 , David Lang da...@lang.hm wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2014, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
On Jul 26, 2014, at 01:26 , David Lang da...@lang.hm wrote:
But I think that what we are seeing from teh results of the bufferbloat
work is that a properly configured
Hi David,
On Jul 26, 2014, at 23:45 , David Lang da...@lang.hm wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2014, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
On Jul 26, 2014, at 22:39 , David Lang da...@lang.hm wrote:
by how much tuning is required, I wasn't meaning how frequently to tune,
but how close default settings can
Hi David,
On Jul 27, 2014, at 00:23 , David Lang da...@lang.hm wrote:
[...]
I'm not worried about an implementation existing as much as the question of
if it's on the routers/switches by default, and if it isn't, is the service
simple enough to be able to avoid causing load on these devices
Hi David,
On Jul 27, 2014, at 00:30 , David Lang da...@lang.hm wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
On Jul 26, 2014, at 22:53 , David Lang da...@lang.hm wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2014, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
On Jul 26, 2014, at 01:26 , David Lang da...@lang.hm wrote
Hi David,
On Jul 27, 2014, at 00:53 , David Lang da...@lang.hm wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
Hi David,
On Jul 26, 2014, at 23:45 , David Lang da...@lang.hm wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2014, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
On Jul 26, 2014, at 22:39 , David Lang da
Hi David,
On Jul 27, 2014, at 00:24 , David Lang da...@lang.hm wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2014, David Lang wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2014, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
On Jul 26, 2014, at 22:39 , David Lang da...@lang.hm wrote:
by how much tuning is required, I wasn't meaning how frequently to tune
Hi David,
On Jul 27, 2014, at 02:49 , David Lang da...@lang.hm wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
On Jul 27, 2014, at 00:53 , David Lang da...@lang.hm wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
Hi David,
On Jul 26, 2014, at 23:45 , David Lang da
On Jul 27, 2014, at 03:04 , David Lang da...@lang.hm wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
[...]
Think of the router ASICs that handle the 'normal' traffic in the ASIC in
the card, but 'unusual' traffic needs to be sent to the core CPU to be
processed and is therefor
Hi Jonathan,
On Jul 27, 2014, at 15:00 , Jonathan Morton chromati...@gmail.com wrote:
A marketing number? Well, as we know, consumers respond best to bigger is
better statistics. So anything reporting delay or ratio in the ways
mentioned so far is doomed to failure - even if we convince
Hi Dave,
hope you had a great time...
On Jul 28, 2014, at 20:59 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
There are a LOT of dsl capable devices in openwrt barrier breaker. I
am curious if anyone has tried one of late? I just got back from
farmstock, and as effective as software rate limiting
Hi MIchael,
On Aug 1, 2014, at 06:51 , Michael Richardson m...@sandelman.ca wrote:
Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de wrote:
No idea? How would you test this (any command line to try). The good
thingg with the ping is that often even the DSLAM responds keeping
external sources (i.e
HI Michael,
On Aug 1, 2014, at 06:21 , Michael Richardson m...@sandelman.ca wrote:
On symmetric links, particularly PPP ones, one can use the LCP layer to do
echo requests to the first layer-3 device. This can be used to measure RTT
and through some math, the bandwidth.
Sure.
Hi R.
what is the output of:
cat sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phy0/ath9k/queues
and
cat sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phy1/ath9k/queues
when it gets stuck? I wonder whether you see the actual same bug as #442 or
some other bug. (I think the current theory is that a number of bugs
contributed to
Hi List,
I just noticed that we have a few issues (we probably inherited from upstream).
I hope that these are be fixed upstream already, but wanted to report them
nevertheless…
This is after a modest uptime:
root@nacktmulle:~# uptime
11:44:00 up 20:21, load average: 0.01, 0.03, 0.04
And
Hi Toke hi Frits,
just a few small things to add to Toke’s...
On Aug 25, 2014, at 14:53 , Toke Høiland-Jørgensen t...@toke.dk wrote:
Frits Riep r...@riepnet.com writes:
I may be misunderstanding, but I thought this was a goal. Am I
incorrect, or have the plans changed?
Don't think the
Hi Aaron,
On Aug 29, 2014, at 18:57 , Aaron Wood wood...@gmail.com wrote:
Comcast has upped the download rates in my area, from 50Mbps to 100Mbps.
This morning I tried to find the limit of the WNDR3800. And I found it.
50Mbps is still well within capabilities, 100Mbps isn't.
And as
Hi Jonathan, hi List,
On Sep 1, 2014, at 23:43 , Jonathan Morton chromati...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 Sep, 2014, at 11:25 pm, Aaron Wood wrote:
But this doesn't really answer the question of why the WNDR has so much
lower a ceiling with shaping than without. The G4 is powerful enough that
Hi Aaron,
On Sep 3, 2014, at 17:12 , Aaron Wood wood...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 4:08 AM, Jonathan Morton chromati...@gmail.com wrote:
Given that the CPU load is confirmed as high, the pcap probably isn't as
useful. The rest would be interesting to look at.
Are you able
Hi Dave,
On Sep 3, 2014, at 21:30 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Aaron,
On Sep 3, 2014, at 17:12 , Aaron Wood wood...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 4:08 AM, Jonathan Morton chromati
Hi Jonathan,
On Sep 4, 2014, at 13:15 , Jonathan Morton chromati...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 Sep, 2014, at 10:04 am, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
IPv6 NOTE: Everyone with a real dual-stack IPv6 and IPv4 connection to the
internet (so not tunneled over IPv4) and an ATM-based DSL connection
Hi Dave, hi List,
On Sep 14, 2014, at 12:45 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
One of the features of the work going on in the ubnt beta forums was the
discovery that you can create named ifb interfaces. So we could switch sqm to
a 1 to 1 mapping of ge00-ifb, se00-ifb, etc. and thus
Hi Dave, hi Andy,
ping_sweeper6.sh
Description: Binary data
On Sep 20, 2014, at 19:55 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
We'd had a very long thread on cerowrt-devel and in the end sebastian
(I think) had developed some scripts to exaustively (it took hours)
derive the right
H Alan,
On Sep 23, 2014, at 01:02 , Alan Goodman
notificati...@yescomputersolutions.com wrote:
On 22/09/14 20:52, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
This test was ran on a BT Infinity VDSL/FTTC connection with the modem
plugged directly into a CentOS 6 machine which is doing PPPoE. The
connection
Hi Andy,
On Sep 23, 2014, at 21:05 , Andy Furniss adf.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Sebastian Moeller wrote:
Hi Andy,
On Sep 23, 2014, at 17:10 , Andy Furniss adf.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
BUT if you look at the kernel code, stab does not automatically
include the ethernet overhead, so
Hi Weedy,
On Oct 2, 2014, at 05:46 , Alpha Sparc alphasp...@gmail.com wrote:
How good is the throughput on CeroWrt compared to OpenWrt ?
I assume you are talking about the pure routing performance with no
firewall/NAT and traffic-shaping involved? I think they pretty much are equal
Hi Dave,
On Oct 3, 2014, at 01:07 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
[cut a lot...]
But: the real killer, on ingress shaping, is the call to skb_clone in
sch_ingress-act_mirred path, I think.
So I thought that we basically have around 50Mbps “shaping-capability”
on the wndrs
Hi Dave, hi list,
I just checked in a modification to luci-app-sqm that should allow to select
PPPoE interfaces like pppeo-ge00 from the “interface name” drop down menu in
SQM’s luci GUI. To be honest this interface box now presents everything in
/sys/class/net, including a few gems like all
Hi Richard,
On Oct 6, 2014, at 18:02 , Richard A. Smith rich...@laptop.org wrote:
On 10/02/2014 10:05 AM, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
I assume you are talking about the pure routing performance with no
firewall/NAT and traffic-shaping involved? I think they pretty much are
equal
Hi Ragna,
On Oct 9, 2014, at 01:51 , Ranga Krishnan ra...@eff.org wrote:
As folks on this list might know the OpenWireless project at EFF adopted
CeroWRT as a base for the hacker release of the OpenWireless router
in July -- which as a result is based on the WNDR 3800. Thanks very much
Hi Richard,
On Oct 9, 2014, at 18:42 , Richard Smith smithb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/06/2014 03:41 PM, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
I have spare routers that I can run OpenWRT or CeroWRt on and I'm
setup to test with netperf, netperf-wrapper on my local network (
desktop - router - laptop
Ooops,
On Oct 9, 2014, at 20:13 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
3.3 is obsolete, use 3.10.
What Dave says, I should have actually looked at the copied link…
Sorry
Sebastian
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Richard,
On Oct 9
Hi List,
I am again in need of testers for SQM. So far SQM tried to deduce from
/etc/config/sqm which interfaces it potentially needed to stop itself on, which
did not work very reliably, since it is easy to just change the interface name
in an existing config file and all traces of the
/~cero2/cerowrt/wndr/3.10.50-1/packages
to /etc/opkg.conf
but I do not know the exact incantation of that, maybe hnyman, or Dave know the
correct answer to this..
Best Regards
Sebastian
Regards,
Luis Garcia
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi
Hi Valdis,
On Oct 9, 2014, at 22:54 , valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Thu, 09 Oct 2014 22:37:30 +0200, Sebastian Moeller said:
I am again in need of testers for SQM.
Sure, what's needed to get the testable bits onto a 3.10.50-1 box?
The attached archaic contains all SQM related files
Hi All,
some more testing:
On Oct 12, 2014, at 01:12 , Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
just to document my current understanding of using SQM on a router that also
terminates a pppoe wan connection. We basically have two options either set
up SQM on the real interface (let’s
Hi Edwin,
On Oct 15, 2014, at 14:02 , Török Edwin edwin+ml-cero...@etorok.net wrote:
On 10/15/2014 03:03 AM, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
I guess it is back to the drawing board to figure out how to speed up
the classification… and then revisit the PPPoE question again…
FWIW I had
Hi Ernesto,
I would recommend to not run the netperf processes on the router you want to
assess, if possible. Shaping at the rates you are interested in probably will
take 100% CPU of the router, so there is no slack for running net server and
netperf instances at the same time. Also I would
if you could document the whole procedure
somehow so we could put it somewhere on the net to make it easier in the
future...
Best Regards
Sebastian
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Ernesto,
I would recommend to not run the netperf
be twiddled with also
to make powerboost's behavior better,
but I've not seen it work.
Best Regards
Sebastian
On Oct 19, 2014, at 21:27 , Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes fiddling with burst seems to make sense. Try 16k
On Oct 19, 2014 11:56 AM, Sebastian Moeller
the netperf-wrapper repository.
Thanks a lot…
Sebastian
It said too many arguments...
What do I do now?
On Oct 21, 2014 4:23 AM, Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Ernesto,
so I would recommend to first install git from a terminal in your ubuntu
virtual machine
python-qt4
python-matplotlib
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
E: Unable to locate package fping
E: Unable to locate package python-matplotlib
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 8:36 PM, Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Ernesto
Hi leetminiwheat (nice handle by the way ;) )
On Nov 6, 2014, at 16:45 , leetminiwheat leetminiwh...@gmail.com wrote:
3.10.50-1 uptime/stability report:
using as primary gw router for a few months now. primary net usage:
gaming, and routing net to cable TV boxes via FiOS provided MoCA
Hi Dane,
On Nov 20, 2014, at 15:13 , Dane Medic dm7...@gmail.com wrote:
dpreed, thank you for response. I'm already using fq_codel with cerowrt and I
don't think it does what I want (or maybe I want too much :)
So the steps I've made:
flashed wndr3700v2 with cerowrt 3.10.50-1 then I've
HI Dane hi Dave,
On Nov 20, 2014, at 17:25 , Dane Medic dm7...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you for advice Dave. I'm just looking around how to set-up layer 7
inspection, I've also found this -
http://luci.subsignal.org/trac/browser/luci/trunk/contrib/package/freifunk-p2pblock?rev=
It would be
can push this without destroying latency under load...
sqm.ge00.enabled=1
Thank you guys,
Dane
2014-11-21 12:16 GMT+01:00 Sebastian Moeller moell...@gmx.de:
Hi Dane,
On Nov 20, 2014, at 15:13 , Dane Medic dm7...@gmail.com wrote:
dpreed, thank you for response. I'm already using
101 - 200 of 358 matches
Mail list logo
