I think everything is about response time, even throughput.
If we compare the time to transmit a single packet from A to B, including
propagation delay, transmission delay and queuing delay,
to the time to move a much larger amount of data from A to B we use
throughput in this second case because
Sorry for resurrecting a year old thread.
Is there any router with 802.11ad chips that can host openwrt?
I did not find any, but I might be wrong.
Luca
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 7:27 PM, Dave Täht wrote:
> It would be so nice, of course, if this was open source from the getgo.
>
>
mber.
>
>
>
> Typical operating points of corporate networks where the users are happy
> are single-digit percentage of max load.
>
>
>
> This is also true of computer buses and memory controllers and storage
> interfaces IRL. Again, latency is the primary measure, and the sys
Remote attendance is free of charge but you have to register to be able to
access.
https://www.ietf.org/registration/ietf105/remotereg.py
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 3:13 PM Dave Taht wrote:
> IETF 105 runs from July 20-27th in Montreal.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/105/agenda/
>
>
Jonathan,
Not that giant handwaving though.
IEEE 802.11ax makes use of "almost TDM" RTS/CTS and scheduling. The almost
is necessary as it operates in 2.4/5Ghz bands.
Similar to what you describe, and is coming very soon in shipping products.
RTS/CTS is still a LBT to create a window where TDM
t; Bob
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 12:24 AM Luca Muscariello <
> luca.muscarie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Jonathan,
>>
>> Not that giant handwaving though.
>> IEEE 802.11ax makes use of "almost TDM" RTS/CTS and scheduling.
For those who might be interested in Little's law
there is a nice paper by John Little on the occasion
of the 50th anniversary of the result.
https://www.informs.org/Blogs/Operations-Research-Forum/Little-s-Law-as-Viewed-on-its-50th-Anniversary
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Sebastian
On Thu, Dec 9, 2021, 17:09 Sebastian Moeller wrote:
> Hi Luca
>
> > On Dec 3, 2021, at 15:58, Luca Muscariello wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 3:35 PM Sebastian Moeller
> wrote:
> > Hi Dave,
>
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, Dec 9, 2021, 19:23 Sebastian Moeller wrote:
> Hi Luca,
>
>
> > On Dec 9, 2021, at 18:38, Luca Muscariello wrote:
> >
> > Hi Sebastian
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 9, 2021, 17:09 Sebastian Moeller wrote:
> > Hi Luca
> &g
--- Begin Message ---
Test using a tp-link AP EAP 245
https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat?test-id=bbcc5ef5-e677-4f27-aa04-1849db81d0f5
On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 7:48 PM Dave Taht wrote:
> tp-link, is, so far as I know, the last major home router vendor NOT
> shipping a SQM system.
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 3:35 PM Sebastian Moeller wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
>
> > On Dec 3, 2021, at 15:18, Dave Taht wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 4:00 AM Luca Muscariello
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Test using a tp-link AP EA
11 matches
Mail list logo
