> On 19 Jun, 2018, at 11:34 pm, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>
> Do we have a good cookbook on how to determine the set-rate?
On DSL, the sync rates in each direction should usually be readable from the
modem; they are typically reported on the router's status page. The advertised
rate is
Well,
On June 19, 2018 10:34:07 PM GMT+02:00, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 18:46:18 -0700, Dave Taht said:
>
>> One of cake's "minor" features is the *perfect* defeat of the htb
>> based shaper in cable modems. If you know the set-rate on the modem,
>> you just set it to
On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 18:46:18 -0700, Dave Taht said:
> One of cake's "minor" features is the *perfect* defeat of the htb
> based shaper in cable modems. If you know the set-rate on the modem,
> you just set it to the same thing and get vastly superior performance to
> docsis 3.1, pie, or the
good rant!
-Original Message-
From: "Dave Taht"
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2018 3:33pm
To: "dpr...@deepplum.com"
Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net, "bloat"
Subject: Re: Invisibility of bufferbloat and its remedies
Well, I ranted:
Well, I ranted: http://blog.cerowrt.org/post/net_neutrality_isps/
I am thinking a string of shorter pieces aimed directly at customers,
reviewers, politicians, etc might do a bit more good than the
gargantuan things jim tends to do.
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 6:46 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> I will be
I will be in D.C., presenting https://www.cs.kau.se/tohojo/cake/ - next week.
If there are people to see, asses to kick or kiss, I'm up for it, let
me know. Presently I just plan to give my talk and get the heck out of
dodge.
One of cake's "minor" features is the *perfect* defeat of the htb
I have been one of the most prominent advocates of network neutrality. I'm
constantly informing my friends and the press about "buffering" not being
related to neutrality at all.
I think that's the best we can do.
Packet neutrality is actually a key part of the Internet's design, pushing
From a ton of memes at: https://me.me/t/buffering
"Dear youtube:
I can deal with ads
I can deal with buffer
But when ads buffer, I suffer"
and innumerable others, some NSFW
https://me.me/i/16133421
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 1:59 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> dpr...@deepplum.com wrote:
>
dpr...@deepplum.com wrote:
> I blame IETF members, individually and collectively. If ietf exists for
> any reason other than as a boondoggle for world travel, it's for
> resolving issues like this one.
Slightly fair.
A thing that I tried to get ISOC's "deploy360" to do was to
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 9:26 AM, dpr...@deepplum.com
wrote:
> https://www.cordcuttersnews.com/3-easy-tips-to-fix-constant-buffering/
>
> It's distressing how little the tech press understands the real problem.
Yea, that one is pretty sad.
It still remains a field of active academic research:
10 matches
Mail list logo
