Title: include vs custom tag
We're still using cf 4.5 sp2. We're currently having a disagreement about whether to define our new framework for a site based on custom tags for each page basically, or the same thing using includes instead. I personally think the custom tags are a complete
: Thursday, March 06, 2003
10:29 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: [KCFusion]
include vs custom tag
We're still using cf 4.5 sp2. We're currently having a
disagreement about whether to define our new framework for a site based on
custom tags for each page basically, or the same thing
AM
Subject: [KCFusion] include vs custom
tag
We're still using cf 4.5 sp2. We're currently having a
disagreement about whether to define our new framework for a site based on
custom tags for each page basically, or the same thing using includes instead.
I personally think
06, 2003 11:02
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [KCFusion]
include vs custom tag
Curious. If you have time, can you explain what
you mean exactly when you say you are going to use custom tags for the
framework?
A.
- Original Message -
From:
Dunwiddie
Title: include vs custom tag
what
version of fusebox are you changing?
-Original Message-From: Dunwiddie, Bruce
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003
11:11 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[KCFusion] include vs custom tag
I'll
leave the answer
: [KCFusion]
include vs custom tag
what
version of fusebox are you changing?
-Original Message-From: Dunwiddie, Bruce
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003
11:11 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[KCFusion] include vs custom tag
I'll leave
Crocker
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:23
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [KCFusion]
include vs custom tag
I've
built some substantially huge CF sites, and using cfmodule instead of
cfinclude wherever you can is critical. Execution time