Re: [CF-metadata] Meeting invite: Advancing netCDF-CF, 24-26 May 2016, Boulder, CO, USA

Hi Jonathan, Thanks for your comments. I've added them to our agenda planning notes. We'll work to get all this integrated in some form for the meeting and future discussions. Yes, though I'm not that familiar with the details of UGRID, it does (now that you mention it) seem related in some

[CF-metadata] Fwd: Meeting invite: Advancing netCDF-CF, 24-26 May 2016, Boulder, CO, USA

Ethan:I would very much appreciate participating remotely when the discussions of space weather products came up.I am already a member of cf_satellite so no issue.The problem with my tech memo is there is SO MUCH THERE. Discussions on the message board usually attack one “construct” at a time.  It

Re: [CF-metadata] Meeting invite: Advancing netCDF-CF, 24-26 May 2016, Boulder, CO, USA

Ethan:I would very much appreciate participating remotely when the discussions of space weather products came up.I am already a member of cf_satellite so no issue.The problem with my tech memo is there is SO MUCH THERE. Discussions on the message board usually attack one “construct” at a time.  It

Re: [CF-metadata] request for new CF standard_name: CDOM

Thanks, Jonathan and Roy! Your suggestions sound fine by me. Cheers, John Maurer Pacific Islands Ocean Observing System (PacIOOS) University of Hawaii at Manoa Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 09:05:08 + > From: "Lowry, Roy K." > To: Jonathan Gregory , >

Re: [CF-metadata] Meeting invite: Advancing netCDF-CF, 24-26 May 2016, Boulder, CO, USA

Hi Steve, Thanks for those introducing those topics. I've added them to our list of topics and made note of Chris, David, and Roy's comments. I will get our list of possible agenda topics and a rough schedule up on the meeting page [1] today or tomorrow that we will update as the agenda

Re: [CF-metadata] Meeting invite: Advancing netCDF-CF, 24-26 May 2016, Boulder, CO, USA

Hi Randy, Sorry you won't be able to join us in May. Thanks for the GOES-R / CF document! I'm sure it will be a good resource in discussions about CF and satellite data. The project folks focused on satellite data are planning to use the existing cf-satell...@unidata.ucar.edu email list [1] to

[CF-metadata] Standard attributes for anomaly

Dear Roy There are a handful of standard names for anomalies of the form X_anomaly, where X is some other standard name. You could propose a new one for this. It could be sea_surface_foundation_temperature_anomaly, like the existing ones, but if that's too hard to understand,

[CF-metadata] Standard attributes for anomaly

Hi All: We have been given files related o sea surface temperature. The observed value has the attributes: analysed_sst:long_name = "analysed sea surface temperature" ; analysed_sst:standard_name = "sea_surface_foundation_temperature" ; and the climatology