Re: [CF-metadata] Feedback requested on proposed CF Simple Geometries

2016-09-27 Thread Chris Barker
Thanks for all the great input, Bert. One comment: > > 5) Besides inventing our own storage format (either in line with UGRID or > CF), a third way was discussed namely: to store the simple geometry shapes > as ascii or binary blobs in an extended format NetCDF 4 file. I think binary blobs is

Re: [CF-metadata] Feedback requested on proposed CF Simple Geometries

2016-09-27 Thread Ben Koziol - NOAA Affiliate
Jonathan and CF-Metadata List, Thanks for the suggestions and discussion. We’ve attempted to respond to the major questions and concerns using Jonathan's mail as a template. Apologies in advance if we missed anything outstanding or did not appropriately acknowledge contributions in this thread.

Re: [CF-metadata] New LUMIP variables

2016-09-27 Thread Jonathan Gregory
Dear Dave Thanks for the text listing of your proposals. Here are a few comments: These ones are existing standard names: surface_net_downward_mass_flux_of_carbon_dioxide_expressed_as_carbon_due_to_all_land_processes moisture_content_of_soil_layer soil_moisture_content I see that there