All,
Sorry to wade into this discussion late, but I believe part of the
difficulty experienced in the discussions here are a consequence of
mixing two distinct 'concepts':
1. Cloud Height Classification Based on Cloud Types
There is a well-recognised allocations of cloud types to height-bands.
Not sure if this was reply from Karl, went to the whole list or just to
me.
Regards,
Bruce
From: Karl Taylor [mailto:taylo...@llnl.gov]
Sent: 15 May 2012 15:09
To: Wright, Bruce
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Standard_name for cloud-cover by phenomenon
All,
Also
) - both our own and others -
received wider review than has previously been the case.)
Regards,
Bruce
-Original Message-
From: TOYODA Eizi [mailto:toy...@gfd-dennou.org]
Sent: 06 October 2011 13:30
To: Wright, Bruce; Bryan Lawrence; cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata
Hi Bryan,
I suspect it probably is becoming important for weather forecast output
now.
At the Met Office, we're now generating 2km post-processed forecast data
(from models running at up 1.5km resolution). At present, this is mainly
shared internally (and with a small number of 'expert'
