Hi all,
the WDCC (http://cera-www.dkrz.de/) describes the sensor(instrument) and
source(platform) metadata with the
nasa dif.
http://gcmd.nasa.gov/User/suppguide/instruments/instrument_identification.html
(http://gcmd.nasa.gov/User/difguide/sensor_name.html)
Here's what I'm using - or trying to use - for moored instruments.
Our data sets are slightly different from the network of sensors that
Eli described, mainly in that we have a single x,y and multiple t,z
dimensions.
It seems to me that ancillary variables are the right way to connect
instrument
Hi Eli,
It's just a personal opinion, but I would strongly favor the first approach,
putting each timeseries into a separate file.
It's simple and straightforward, and it reflects the nature of the data source.
I don't know of any standard nomenclature for sensor names either, but as long
as
: Re: [CF-metadata] Conventions for a network of velocity sensors
Hi Eli,
It's just a personal opinion, but I would strongly favor the first approach,
putting each timeseries into a separate file.
It's simple and straightforward, and it reflects the nature of the data source.
I don't know
