Re: [CF-metadata] Correct name for aerosol size distributionexpressedin numbers ?

2010-11-29 Thread alison.pamment
[mailto:cf-metadata- boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of Jonathan Gregory Sent: 27 November 2010 14:21 To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu Subject: [CF-metadata] Correct name for aerosol size distributionexpressedin numbers ? Dear Bruno Either the geophysical quantity or the bin index could

Re: [CF-metadata] Correct name for aerosol size distributionexpressedin numbers ?

2010-11-29 Thread Cameron-smith, Philip
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Correct name for aerosol size distributionexpressedin numbers ? Dear Bruno, Jonathan and Roy, Thanks all for your comments. As far as the standard name is concerned, I think we are agreed on aerosol_particle_diameter to describe the particle sizes. This would have

Re: [CF-metadata] Correct name for aerosol size distributionexpressedin numbers ?

2010-11-26 Thread Bruno PIGUET
Jonathan, I tried to re-phrase your proposal, following Alison and others on diameters, and trying to give meaningful names (at least to me) I think that coordinate attribute should indicate a geophysical value rater than and index, so now, the coordinate attribute points to

Re: [CF-metadata] Correct name for aerosol size distributionexpressedin numbers ?

2010-11-24 Thread Lowry, Roy K.
-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk Sent: 24 November 2010 13:47 To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Correct name for aerosol size distributionexpressedin numbers ? Dear Jonathan and Bruno, I agree with Jonathan's point that the particle size