Note that the new name effective_radius_of_cloud_particles_at_cloud_top takes
away any mention of water, so now any particle is included.
John
On Dec 19, 2013, at 03:44, alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk wrote:
Dear Jonathan,
Condensed_water is indeed the phrase used in CF standard names to refer
Dear CF board,
I would like to close the loop on a question posed this past April
pertaining to the definition associated with the standard name,
atmosphere_optical_thickness_due_to_cloud. At the time, it was observed
by the original poster that the definition of this standard
name does not
All of this makes sense to me.
It prompts me to ask: Is 'cloud' actually a process? Or should the standard
due_to definition clause be updated to include process or substance?
John
On Dec 19, 2013, at 09:49, Gary Meehan gmee...@aer.com wrote:
Dear CF board,
I would like to close the
Folks:
We have a product with a data variable containing 10 degree latitude band
statistics (i.e. min, max) derived from observation data whose east/west
extents are associated with the field of view of a geostationary satellite
(i.e. the recently defined geostationary grid mapping /
