Re: [CF-metadata] Editing/publishing workflow

2014-03-12 Thread Hattersley, Richard
Jeff, Thanks for picking up on the governance issue. One of the reasons I included chapter two was to demonstrate how a non-trivial change to the document could be handled. The governance rules state that changes are to be shown in the CF documents as provisional, but they do not mandate

Re: [CF-metadata] Editing/publishing workflow

2014-03-12 Thread Jeffrey F. Painter
Regarding using the repository to show changes - this wasn't practical with the svn repository because it wasn't public. Very soon the DocBook sources will be visible to everyone on github. The preface to the CF Conventions document does specify how provisional changes are to be displayed,

Re: [CF-metadata] Editing/publishing workflow

2014-03-12 Thread Mike Grant
On 12/03/14 17:41, Jeffrey F. Painter wrote: You may have gathered that I don't think the highlighting system has worked as well as originally intended, so I would welcome a change - whether or not we continue to use DocBook, etc. As someone that reasonably often consults the conventions