I have both
cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
and
cf-metad...@lists.llnl.gov
it appears the many (most?) still use cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu, i
guess its being forwarded to cf-metad...@lists.llnl.gov
___
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Use cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu.
The one at llnl.gov is part of the system for connecting the Trac
issue-tracker to the main mailing list at ucar.edu.
- Jeff
On 11/18/14, 11:52 AM, John Caron wrote:
I have both
I see, so we should continue to use cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu. for normal
conversation?
BTW, the TRAC system is either down or slow enough to time out.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Jeffrey F. Painter paint...@llnl.gov
wrote:
Use cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu.
The one at llnl.gov is part of
Yes, keep on using the ucar.edu one as before. The llnl.gov list
has been there for very many years, but never has been something you
would send mail to.
The security people here don't like something (I don't know what)
about kitt.llnl.gov. So I am right now in
CF TRAC ticket 72 defines geostationary projection, accepted for 1.7.
1) I _think_ that Vertical Perspective is an earlier version of this, and
it should be deprecated in favor of geostationary. Does anyone have a
different opinion?
2) The draft 1.7 does not yet include it, so its been hard to
Hi.
I'm having trouble getting the cfchecker python app to run correctly. Is
Rosalyn Hatcher maintaining it? If not, who? Is there a location where
bugs are reported, etc?
Grace and peace,
Jim
--
CICS-NC http://www.cicsnc.org/ Visit us on
Facebook http://www.facebook.com/cicsnc
John:
geostationary projection and vertical perspective projections are not the same.
an example of a vertical projection image is one taken by a camera in space,
which is not necessarily at the equator, and the data for the entire image is
observed using a single exposure.
the geostationary
