Re: [CF-metadata] Temporal nitpicks.

2016-09-23 Thread Sean Arms
Hi all, NetCDF-Java has no issues with T or no T in an ISO time string. Sean On Friday, September 23, 2016, Ethan Davis wrote: > Hi Chris, > > >> I'm going to venture a guess that the netcdf Java libs can [handle the >> "T"] (anyone know for sure?) > > > Yes, the netCDF-Java

Re: [CF-metadata] Temporal nitpicks.

2016-09-23 Thread Ethan Davis
Hi Chris, > I'm going to venture a guess that the netcdf Java libs can [handle the > "T"] (anyone know for sure?) Yes, the netCDF-Java library can parse date/time strings with the "T". Ethan On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Chris Barker wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016

Re: [CF-metadata] Temporal nitpicks.

2016-09-23 Thread Ethan Davis
I totally agree. Don't deprecate anything but definitely encourage ISO 8601:2004(E) with the caveat of requiring an offset-from-Z indicator. Cheers, Ethan On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Bob Simons - NOAA Federal < bob.sim...@noaa.gov> wrote: > Seth McGinnis said: > "I hesitate to support

[CF-metadata] New LUMIP variables

2016-09-23 Thread David Lawrence
For LUMIP we would like to propose several new variables, listed in the attached excel spreadsheet, to the list. Thanks, Dave Lawrence and Elena Shevliakova CMIP6DataRequest_LUMIP_propose_to_list.xlsx Description: MS-Excel 2007 spreadsheet ___

Re: [CF-metadata] CF-metadata Digest, Vol 161, Issue 12

2016-09-23 Thread Chris Barker
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Aaron Sweeney - NOAA Affiliate < aaron.swee...@noaa.gov> wrote: > In case you and others are not already aware the Internet Engineering > Task Force (IETF) RFC 3339: "Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps," > circa 2002, (see

[CF-metadata] Temporal nitpicks.

2016-09-23 Thread Bob Simons - NOAA Federal
Seth McGinnis said: "I hesitate to support encouraging the use of the T because in my experience, approximately 0% of existing NetCDF files have it." a) We aren't advocating forbidding the older formats / saying that files with those time formats will become invalid. This is a question of what we

Re: [CF-metadata] standard_names for wind stress curl, wind stress divergence

2016-09-23 Thread Bruce Hackett
Picking this up again after a long silence. I have been discussing this with my colleagues at KNMI and have gotten some comments from Alison Pamment (thanks). The conclusion is that we would like to revise the suggestion somewhat. The proposal for the wind stress divergence is essentially