Re: [CF-metadata] [cf-convention/cf-conventions] WIP: Clarify geostationary projection items (#259)

2020-04-21 Thread Daniel Lee
Hi Karl, sorry, it's shorthand for "Work In Progress". I didn't know when I'd have a chance to finish this so I thought it was more important to note concretely what I want to do based on the discussion in #258 in the manuscript, obviating to re-read the long thread before restarting. After

Re: [CF-metadata] [cf-convention/cf-conventions] WIP: Clarify geostationary projection items (#259)

2020-04-21 Thread JimBiardCics
Work In Progress -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/pull/259#issuecomment-617325722 This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from

Re: [CF-metadata] [cf-convention/cf-conventions] WIP: Clarify geostationary projection items (#259)

2020-04-21 Thread taylor13
Just curious and maybe I should know this, but what does "WIP" stand for in the issue title? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/pull/259#issuecomment-617324452

[CF-metadata] [cf-convention/cf-conventions] WIP: Clarify geostationary projection items (#259)

2020-04-21 Thread Daniel Lee
See issue #258 for discussion of these changes. It is a work in progress and is not yet ready for review. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/pull/259 -- Commit Summary -- * Add todos -- File Changes -- M