> Maybe we could append a new item at the end of "Coordinate Compression Steps" > in Appendix J recommending that data producers check the positional error by > comparing the reconstructed coordinates against the original data, and then > provide as many details as possible regarding the reconstruction process and > results (computational precision, positional error, etc...) in the `comment` > attribute of the subsampled coordinates variables.
Thanks, Sylvain, I support this suggestion -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/327*issuecomment-876374013__;Iw!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!kZszGue4OdMmpZ1gqyUUx7l4B062bw9hFfkvShkLgNOnhvlySBeut2HTEbEHPrFGIZFfGUVhzNo$ This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from cf-metad...@cgd.ucar.edu, although if you do nothing, a subscription to the UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list. To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to cf-metadata-unsubscribe-requ...@listserv.llnl.gov.
