Dear @JonathanGregory,
Appendix J is now ready for your review.
The only remaining open issues is now that we will do one more iteration on the
section on Computational Precision for Chapter 8 - we will publish it here
within the next days.
Best regards,
Anders
--
You are receiving this
@AndersMS pushed 1 commit.
ecdaf926c5b6ba87045d47f5dabffe25715429c8 Correct numbering mistake in Appendix
J
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
@AndersMS pushed 1 commit.
a285b42869c278d948ec387a47e74e64e4ed07f4 Correct spelling mistake in Appendix J
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
@AndersMS pushed 1 commit.
0ef79f53ef5b0713969fa9d2b400a4c5205f3c13 Update Appendix J with new terms and
names
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
@AndersMS pushed 1 commit.
0c5b732cbbf7d2ddc006e3708813e7c70a722e16 Require tie points to be numeric type
and have no missing values
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
@AndersMS pushed 1 commit.
3ea5989193f8dc3dd7bc14db8b047fc19d8234f0 Update <> names and figure
names to new terms
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
Yes, thanks for your prompt review. Much appreciated since I wouldn't be able
to get to it for some time.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Dear All,
Just to let you know that as agreed during the discussion of the new
"Interpolation of Cell Boundaries" section (f3de508) I have added a the
following sentence in the "Interpolation Parameters"
section (2ce5d66):
> Interpolation parameters are not permitted to contain absolute
@AndersMS pushed 1 commit.
2ce5d66afbb3a93ee1cc4497d0ead05f38d1aee5 Constrain interpolation parameters to
support bounds interpolation
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
@davidhassell -- does history.adoc still need to be updated? If not, go ahead
and merge.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
All looks good to me. The new figures and inclusion of source code is !!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Dear @AndersMS
Thanks for the update and your hard work on this. I will read the section again
in conjunction with Appendix J, once you announce that the latter is ready.
Best wishes
Jonathan
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly
> From the data model perspective, there needs to be SOME way to define the
> connectivity. how it's done is a matter of the "encoding", yes?
Yes, that is what I was "trying" to say !
> ?? -- but does X connect to Y is the key concept we are trying to capture
> here.
> in "lay" terms, I
13 matches
Mail list logo
