@sadielbartholomew approved this pull request.
The new workflow looks sound to me, apart from a few warnings [TODO]. Great
stuff.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
@davidhassell thanks, that clarifies it for me. I approve.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
@erget approved this pull request.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Hi @erget - we list by issue, rather than PR, so it's there under 258:
```
.02 June 2020
. link:$$https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/258$$[Issue
#258]: Clarification of geostationary projection items
```
Is that OK?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to
@erget commented on this pull request.
@davidhassell I'm a bit confused about how some of the issues have disappeared
- e.g. #259 is no longer mentioned in the updated history file. Is this
intended?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email
See issue #XXX for discussion of these changes.
# Release checklist
- [x] Authors updated in `cf-conventions.adoc`?
- [ ] Next version in `cf-conventions.adoc` up to date? Versioning inspired by
Merged #324 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Closed #323 via #324.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
