Re: [CF-metadata] [cf-convention/cf-conventions] Clarify some formula terms definitions (#304)

2021-03-06 Thread David Hassell
Closed #304. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [CF-metadata] [cf-convention/cf-conventions] Clarify some formula terms definitions (#304)

2021-03-04 Thread David Hassell
Thanks @taylor13 and @JonathanGregory, I shall merge shortly (which will also close https://github.com/cf-convention/discuss/issues/84). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [CF-metadata] [cf-convention/cf-conventions] Clarify some formula terms definitions (#304)

2021-03-03 Thread taylor13
I agree. It's o.k. Thanks. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/304#issuecomment-789802835 This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is

Re: [CF-metadata] [cf-convention/cf-conventions] Clarify some formula terms definitions (#304)

2021-03-03 Thread JonathanGregory
Yes, I think it's OK, thanks. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/304#issuecomment-789735455 This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is

Re: [CF-metadata] [cf-convention/cf-conventions] Clarify some formula terms definitions (#304)

2021-03-03 Thread David Hassell
Hello, Are we OK to merge this PR, do you think? The proposed changes in #305 come from a dimensional analysis resulting from writing software can create the non-parametric vertical coordinates from formula terms. We've not heard about about any checks on the correctness of the formulae

Re: [CF-metadata] [cf-convention/cf-conventions] Clarify some formula terms definitions (#304)

2020-11-10 Thread David Hassell
Thanks, @taylor13. I don't know of any such data providers for the more involved formulas (such as `ocean_double_sigma_coordinate`), and it would indeed be good to hear from those who are familiar with them. Any takers? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Re: [CF-metadata] [cf-convention/cf-conventions] Clarify some formula terms definitions (#304)

2020-11-10 Thread David Hassell
I've changed my mind about "For `ocean_double_sigma_coordinate` that `a`, `z1` and `z2` must all have identical units of (any) length (to ensure that the tanh operand is correct)". I think that it's OK for them to have different units of length (e.g. 'm' and 'km'), and it's up to the user to

[CF-metadata] [cf-convention/cf-conventions] Clarify some formula terms definitions (#304)

2020-11-10 Thread David Hassell
# Clarify some formula terms definitions # Moderator [TBD] # Moderator Status Review [last updated: -MM-DD] Brief comment on current status, update periodically # Requirement Summary The formulas for computing non-parametric vertical coordinates are in general well defined, but in some