Hi @lesserwhirls , that sounds awesome! I fully support migrating the Travis
build into GitHub actions - let's move discussion of this into a separate issue
I'll shard out of here.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on
> **Opportunity for improvement:**
>
> 1. First of all I find it a bit confusing to have builds on both Travis and
> GitHub Actions. If we ever get the time it might be a good idea to refactor
> this. This is especially important because the build process must be
> maintained ATM in 2 places,
# Analysis of build problem
I'll also insert this into the issue description above.
1 of the problems here was the build process. I have fixed it and noted a
further opportunity for improvement below.
There are 2 build jobs that should have been uploading images next to the
compiled docs, but
@erget Thanks for investigating
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/295#issuecomment-686987420
This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is
Looks like this is correct, as the images make it into the PDF.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/295#issuecomment-686986151
This list forwards relevant
Yes, I'm seeing that no figures are rendering, it looks like there's an issue
with the assets as referenced. Investigating now...
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
The [other new
figure](http://cfconventions.org/cf-conventions/cf-conventions.html#img-netCDF)
also does not seem to render.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> @erget Do you know why the figure does not render correctly? Is it a wrong
> file format?
Haven't had time to investigate yet, but I can take a look tomorrow.
> I will correct the order.
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email
@erget Do you know why the figure does not render correctly? Is it a wrong file
format?
> Furthermore, @AndersMS has noticed that the ordering in the text regarding
> the order of indices i and j are reversed in the figure - this should be
> harmonised as it was likely not intentional
# Title
Errors introduced in 276: Rendering of figure and i, j index order
# Moderator
@user - I'm recruiting for this!
# Requirement Summary
The figure introduced in #276 [doesn't render
correctly](http://cfconventions.org/cf-conventions/cf-conventions.html#cell-boundaries).
Furthermore,
10 matches
Mail list logo
