Closed #193 via #276.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/193#event-3575759931
This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from
@erget Thanks
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/193#issuecomment-652260625
This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from
This proposal has remained unchanged for 3 weeks and no objections have been
raised. That means that it is stable and if no objections are raised I will
merge the corresponding pull request on 2020-07-22.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email
The proposed changes to the text are minimal, essentially adding only the 2
diagrams and some explanatory text. I invite all who are interested to review
the changes in the Pull Request (e.g. by downloading the PDF build artefact)
and raise concerns, should there be any.
I will check in on
Discussed in a break out group at the CF Conventions Annual Meeting 2020. Short
minutes are provided [here in a Google
Doc](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ueYsYrPob8Gd3HxQVHC0vKfpj_Jjh0iO4Pe70_QLpDk).
Summary:
* visualization corresponding to the text
* faster unterstanding of the order
This issue is already quite mature. In summary:
- A figure was proposed in order to improve the clarity of the Conventions
document
- This has been improved based on feedback from multiple reviewers
- The figure as it stands is considered to add value to the document
- The only thing that is
@neumannd my apologies that this fell by the wayside - as we [discussed at the
CF Community
Meeting](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ueYsYrPob8Gd3HxQVHC0vKfpj_Jjh0iO4Pe70_QLpDk/edit)
I, too, support this proposal and am happy to moderate so that we can get this
into 1.9. I'll add a summary
@davidhassell Thanks. Noted in my calender.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/193#issuecomment-639351010
This list forwards relevant notifications from
Hello,
The timings and order of the breakout groups for the CF meeting next week has
now been set (see http://cfconventions.org/Meetings/2020-Workshop.html), and
the discussion of this issue will be on Wednesday 10 June from 17:30-19:00 UTC,
in parallel with three other topics.
Thanks.
--
@taylor13 : Thanks for the feedback. If it is clearer on the first view, I
could adapt the original figure to be like the first figure in my last comment
-- printing `(lon_bnds_n, lat_bnds_n)`-tuples at the vertices and writing
`lon_bnds_n = lon_bnds(i, j, n), ...` at the top.
--
You are
I *was* indeed confused, but I probably shouldn't have been. Thanks for going
to the trouble of explaining. I think your original diagram should be clear
enough to those thinking clearly.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or
@taylor13
Maybe this figures shows clearer what I mean?
lon1, lon2, ... actually mean lon_bnd1, lon_bnds2, ... .
For my example I assume that we have some grid, which
I'm either confused, or I agree with @davidhassell
(https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/193#issuecomment-525778635)
that in the lower figure the abscissa and ordinate axes are mislabeled.
Don't the dashed lines in the figure represent lines of latitude and longitude,
not
I see no reason in principle against diagrams in the document. On the contrary,
they would be an enhancement. I think the question is technical: can they be
included in AsciiDoc, and will the software which builds the HTML and the PDF
from the AsciiDoc be able to process them properly?
--
You
Unfortunately, we did not assign a moderator here so that this issue was
forgotten. Are there any caveats including these figures into the CF
conventions?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
15 matches
Mail list logo
