For what it's worth (probably not much), I approve.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/241#issuecomment-607889648
This list forwards relevant notifications
Ah, well then, I totally approve.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/241#issuecomment-607868287
This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It
...Of course that's assuming that you **would** wish to express approval -
sorry for putting words in your mouth there :)
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
@JimBiardCics as moderator you can express approval for the change. However,
[we need at least 3 people](http://cfconventions.org/rules.html) to express
support for the change, 2 of which need to be from the Conventions Committee.
As it stands we're 2 for 3, but of course it might be that
This proposed change is to make the generic statement
> The attributes which describe the ellipsoid and prime the final section.
meridian may be included, when applicable, with any grid mapping.
to
> The attributes which describe the ellipsoid and prime meridian may be
> included, when
As moderator I guess I can't approve of the change, so we need others to come
and say so or give reason why not.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
I've merged it. As you say, it was past the time limit and since it was a
defect it's approved by default. Thanks.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Closed #238 via #240.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/238#event-3191054853
This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from
Merged #240 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/pull/240#event-3191054844
This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from
@JimBiardCics thanks! I've assigned you.
@davidhassell this would apply for all grid mappings "when applicable". The
details are in #242 - in essence the change would be to explicitly list what
users must currently infer.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Hi @rhorne99 you're right, there's nothing that prevents a 3-axis stabilised
satellite from behaving like Meteosat 1st or 2nd generation.
Meteosat 3rd generation deviates from the concept of previous generations by
scanning in out of alignment with the image's axes. And to make matters more
11 matches
Mail list logo
