Re: [CF-metadata] [cf-convention/cf-conventions] Add explanation of status_flag, quality_flag, other QC flag standard names to Chapter 3.4 (#235)

2020-04-29 Thread David Blodgett
Just noting that this has been open for far too long. @davidhassell and @roy-lowry are called out as reviewers. What's the status? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [CF-metadata] [cf-convention/cf-conventions] Amend broken link (RE COARDS Conventions) in bibliography (#236)

2020-04-29 Thread David Blodgett
 and sorry for the delay in merging. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/pull/236#issuecomment-621377713 This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It

Re: [CF-metadata] [cf-convention/cf-conventions] Amend broken link (RE COARDS Conventions) in bibliography (#236)

2020-04-29 Thread David Blodgett
Merged #236 into master. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/pull/236#event-3285839250 This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from

Re: [CF-metadata] [cf-convention/cf-conventions] Update geostationary projection to allow clean description of newer generation satellites (#258)

2020-04-29 Thread Daniel Lee
Dear geostationary friends, I've now completed a proposal text, found in #259 . It reflects the results of this discussion and would be happy to discuss your approval or criticism. At this note, now that we have a concrete proposal on the table, who would be willing to moderate this