Oh, I just saw that the crossed out "is". Sorry.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/222#issuecomment-656300980
This list forwards relevant notifications
@snowman2 My poor brain can't seem to detect what exactly was tweaked. Could
you please point to the specific change made?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Minor tweak:
For example, if the semi-major axis length of the ellipsoid ~~is~~ defined by
the grid mapping attribute semi_major_axis **disagrees with** the crs_wkt
attribute (via the WKT SPHEROID[…] element), the value of this attribute
cannot be interpreted accurately.
--
You are
Yes, I think the intent of this is fine.
I don't recall the text that precedes the revised text, but should the first
sentence read:
"If, *for a given property,* both crs_wkt and grid mapping attributes exist,
the attributes must be the same and grid mapping parameters should always be
This issue doesn't have a moderator - I think that's why it's not progressed. I
will moderate it. @snowman2's current proposal
(https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/pull/282) is to replace
However, in those situations where two values of a given property are
different, then the
Hello all,
While searching for defining characteristics of a _coordinate variable_ versus
a _geospatial variable_, I found this issue. I marked it as a defect. My search
also brought me to related issue #174, which seems to not have been resolved
yet.
# Hyperlink to the NetCDF Users Guide
