From: CF-metadata on behalf of Jonathan
Gregory
Sent: 10 May 2018 16:32:30
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: [CF-metadata] Fwd: Re: proposed new standard name for storm surge
residual
Dear Andy
This looks good to me. Thanks for your persistence.
Bes
pplication of harmonic tidal series as boundary conditions to a
numerical tidal model.
Many thanks
Andy
-Original Message-
From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of
Jonathan Gregory
Sent: 09 May 2018 15:46
To: cf-metadata@cg
Dear Andy
> tidal_sea_surface_height_above_lowest_astronomical_tide
> Units: m
> "Sea surface height" is a time-varying quantity. "Height_above_X" means the
> vertical distance above the named surface X. "Chart datum" describes a local
> vertical reference from which depths displayed on a
to:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of Lowry,
Roy K.
Sent: 08 May 2018 16:04
To: Gregory, Jonathan <j.m.greg...@reading.ac.uk>; cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] proposed new standard name for storm surge residual
Dear Andy,
I agree with Jonathan that specifically referenc
Tue, 8 May 2018 08:08:13 +
> From: "Saulter, Andrew" <andrew.saul...@metoffice.gov.uk>
> To: "cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu" <cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu>
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] proposed new standard name for storm surge
>residual
>
&g
gt; > > > variable describing the time varying tidal signal, for example as
> > > > > > > generated based on a summation of harmonically analysed
> > > > > > > components, or resulting from the application of such components
> > > > >
t; > no datum, it means the difference between SSH with tide and without tide.
> > What does "without tide" mean, then? It could mean "with permanent tide but
> > no time-varying tide", for instance. If you include a datum you get
> > something like &qu
t; Jonathan
>
>
>
> - Forwarded message from "Saulter, Andrew"
> <andrew.saul...@metoffice.gov.uk> -----
>
> > Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 07:08:01 +
> > From: "Saulter, Andrew" <andrew.saul...@metoffice.gov.uk>
> > To:
odc.ac.uk>
Sent: 03 May 2018 09:47
To: Saulter, Andrew; cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] proposed new standard name for storm surge residual
Hi Andy,
A thought that struck me as I read through your e-mail is that surges aren't
the only meteorological forcing. Whilst in a m
.
From: CF-metadata <cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu> on behalf of Saulter,
Andrew <andrew.saul...@metoffice.gov.uk>
Sent: 03 May 2018 09:28
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] proposed new standard name for storm surge residua
) in order to allow us to construct a
> sea level series that is vertically referenced, whereas surge and other
> contributions will be relative quantities.
>
> Cheers
> Andy
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@c
s
Jonathan
- Forwarded message from "Saulter, Andrew"
<andrew.saul...@metoffice.gov.uk> -
> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 07:08:01 +
> From: "Saulter, Andrew" <andrew.saul...@metoffice.gov.uk>
> To: "cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu" <cf-metadata@
> sea level series that is vertically referenced, whereas surge and other
> contributions will be relative quantities.
>
> Cheers
> Andy
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of
> Jonathan Greg
gt;
Sent: 24 April 2018 08:17
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] proposed new standard name for storm surge residual
John,
I see where you are with that, but my understanding from Jonathon Gregory's
email earlier is that the 'due_to' part of the phrasing identifies a compon
24 April 2018 18:30
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] proposed new standard name for storm surge residual
Dear Andy
> - I'm only going to do this for sea water levels, so from my point of
> view using the term "sea" is fine; I'm just aware that what comes
>
the water surface is". That
> is rather subtle and language-dependent, so I'm a bit nervous about it. It
> also might just be me! How does it sound to you?
>
> Best wishes
>
> Jonathan
>
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: CF-metadata [mailto
;
> So some consensus as to whether "sea_surface_elevation" is the phrasing to go
> for would be very helpful...
>
> Cheers
> Andy
>
> -Original Message-
> From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf
> Of Saulter, Andrew
&g
ome consensus as to whether "sea_surface_elevation" is the phrasing to go
> for would be very helpful...
>
> Cheers
> Andy
>
> -Original Message-
> From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of
> Saulter, Andrew
> Sent: 20 April 2018 1
ar.edu] On Behalf Of
Saulter, Andrew
Sent: 20 April 2018 17:04
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] proposed new standard name for storm surge residual
Jonathon, Helen,
Thanks for the feedback.
I'd looked at the existing 'sea_surface_height' terms but had the same worry as
Jona
sna...@bodc.ac.uk>
> To: "Saulter, Andrew" <andrew.saul...@metoffice.gov.uk>
> CC: "cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu" <cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu>
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] proposed new standard name for storm surge
> residual
> x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.18)
20 matches
Mail list logo
