Re: [CF-metadata] [cf-convention/cf-conventions] Add unit_conversion_factor for units in coordinate axis to convert to meters (#248)

2020-03-01 Thread Alan D. Snow
I have a list of units I would like to ensure are supported at a minimum here 
to ensure a safe conversion from WKT to the CF convention (note: only the ones 
with the type `length`). See: 
[unit_of_measure.sql](https://github.com/OSGeo/PROJ/blob/d928db15d53805d9b728b440079756081961c536/data/sql/unit_of_measure.sql).

And from what I can tell, only a subset are supported by the CF convention: 
[UDUNITS 
Database](https://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/udunits/udunits-current/doc/udunits/udunits2.html#Database).

Here are some examples of missing units:
- British foot (Sears 1922) - 3.04799471538676203241e-01
- Indian foot (1975) - 0.3047995
- Gold Coast foot - 3.04799710181508809458e-01

I am sure there are others not supported by CF or WKT currently. When a unit 
that is not supported by the CF convention is found, what is the recommended 
procedure? Is this something that the developers of the `UDUNITS` program are 
interested in keeping in-sync?


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/248#issuecomment-593187674

This list forwards relevant notifications from Github.  It is distinct from 
cf-metad...@cgd.ucar.edu, although if you do nothing, a subscription to the 
UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list.
To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to 
cf-metadata-unsubscribe-requ...@listserv.llnl.gov.

Re: [CF-metadata] [cf-convention/cf-conventions] Add unit_conversion_factor for units in coordinate axis to convert to meters (#248)

2020-02-20 Thread JimBiardCics
I agree that we shouldn't make this change. It looks like a way to allow people 
to get extremely sloppy with units.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/248#issuecomment-589126733

This list forwards relevant notifications from Github.  It is distinct from 
cf-metad...@cgd.ucar.edu, although if you do nothing, a subscription to the 
UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list.
To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to 
cf-metadata-unsubscribe-requ...@listserv.llnl.gov.

Re: [CF-metadata] [cf-convention/cf-conventions] Add unit_conversion_factor for units in coordinate axis to convert to meters (#248)

2020-02-18 Thread JonathanGregory
Like others, I would argue against this change, on grounds of wanting to avoid 
redundancy and hence inconsistency. A main purpose of providing the CRS 
information (in `grid_mapping` attributes or as WKT) is to enable the software 
to convert from the grid coordinates to other coordinate systems. It is 
expected that software which processes the data will be able to do that.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/248#issuecomment-587584553

This list forwards relevant notifications from Github.  It is distinct from 
cf-metad...@cgd.ucar.edu, although if you do nothing, a subscription to the 
UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list.
To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to 
cf-metadata-unsubscribe-requ...@listserv.llnl.gov.

Re: [CF-metadata] [cf-convention/cf-conventions] Add unit_conversion_factor for units in coordinate axis to convert to meters (#248)

2020-02-14 Thread Martin
As Klaus points out, the units need to come from the Udunits list, so the 
correct units attribute would be `US_survey_foot`. 

When I use the Udunits2 linux command line tool, it gives a conversion factor 
of 0.304801, which is significantly less precise. The XML database that comes 
with the python package gives the more precise value of 1200/3937.  

Given that it takes some digging to get the conversion factor out of Udunits, I 
can see a potential case for providing space to add it explicitly. You would 
need, however, to indicate what the target units are, e.g. 
`meter_conversion_factor`.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/248#issuecomment-586209060

This list forwards relevant notifications from Github.  It is distinct from 
cf-metad...@cgd.ucar.edu, although if you do nothing, a subscription to the 
UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list.
To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to 
cf-metadata-unsubscribe-requ...@listserv.llnl.gov.

Re: [CF-metadata] [cf-convention/cf-conventions] Add unit_conversion_factor for units in coordinate axis to convert to meters (#248)

2020-02-14 Thread Klaus Zimmermann
Units have to come from udunits (see [CF-1.8, 
3.1](http://cfconventions.org/Data/cf-conventions/cf-conventions-1.8/cf-conventions.html#units)),
 which will also provide the conversion factors. In this sense, this proposal 
seems unnecessary.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/248#issuecomment-586191970

This list forwards relevant notifications from Github.  It is distinct from 
cf-metad...@cgd.ucar.edu, although if you do nothing, a subscription to the 
UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list.
To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to 
cf-metadata-unsubscribe-requ...@listserv.llnl.gov.