Re: How do your ISPs handle CF mappings?

2003-09-07 Thread David Delbridge
Hi Mauricio, Just to give you another ISP's perspective, we have offerred self-service setup of ColdFusion mappings through our control panel for years. The only security limitations enforced by the application are largely common-sense: 1.) Restrict the target of a mapping to the customer's

Request vs application

2003-09-07 Thread Ryan Mitchell
Hello I've just developed a site where I have a lot of request variables defined in application.cfm, which are constant values... Would there be benefit in defining these as application variables? Ryan ~| Archives:

Re: Request vs application

2003-09-07 Thread Gyrus
At 13:24 07/09/2003 +0100, you wrote: I've just developed a site where I have a lot of request variables defined in application.cfm, which are constant values... Would there be benefit in defining these as application variables? If you're using CFMX, probably best to store constants in the

Rogue application.cfm file

2003-09-07 Thread Laura Schlee
I have what seems to me to be a problem with changes made by an old application.cfm file. I'm adding some pages to an existing application but I'm currently doing all my development offsite with a temporary database. This weekend was the first time I took home some of the previously existing

RE: Rogue application.cfm file

2003-09-07 Thread Michael T. Tangorre
If you are running MX, delete all the old class files, forcing CF to recompile the files. -Original Message- From: Laura Schlee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 9:52 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Rogue application.cfm file I have what seems to me to be a problem

Re: Request vs application

2003-09-07 Thread Ryan Mitchell
Cool, that¹s what I was thinking, its nice to double check. I'm mx, so I guess I'll have to change them all to application scope :) I've not stored constants there before, do I still have to set them in the application.cfm file? That will mean they get overwritten every request? On 7/9/03

Re: about blue dragon.

2003-09-07 Thread Mahmut Basaran
thanks, was just curious about the specs of the notebook. - Original Message - From: Sean A Corfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 4:59 AM Subject: Re: about blue dragon. On Saturday, Sep 6, 2003, at 17:42 US/Pacific, Matt Liotta

Coldfusion server fail when reboot?

2003-09-07 Thread John Ho
Thank you all for your help. I think problem from DataSource. Whenever it gets data from data base it give this error: The DataSource service is not available. This exception is usually caused by service startup failure. Please check your server configuration. And I go to Coldfusion

RE: Rogue application.cfm file

2003-09-07 Thread Laura Schlee
Hi Michael, I deleted the old class files (you meant the ones in the cfclasses directory, a few layers under the CFusion MX directory, right?) and it's accepting my data now! Hurray! It's still ignoring the validation process, which is obnoxious, but at least it is now taking correctly entered

RE: Request vs application

2003-09-07 Thread Jim Davis
You don't have to set Application variable in the Application.cfm - you can set them anyplace. You DON'T want to set to set them every request however - that defeats the purpose of the Application scope. ;^) The most common way to do this is to set a marker variable of some kind (I use

Re: about blue dragon.

2003-09-07 Thread Jeffry Houser
I've got my machine set up to run CFMX, CF5, and BlueDragon all off a single instance of IIS (I.E. using the same port). It works great, but takes a bit of a setup. I wouldn't recommend it on production servers, but it is perfect for development. I co-wrote an article (with Charlie

Re: Request vs application

2003-09-07 Thread Ryan Mitchell
Excellent, thanks for the pointers :) Ryan On 7/9/03 17:48, Jim Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You don't have to set Application variable in the Application.cfm - you can set them anyplace. You DON'T want to set to set them every request however - that defeats the purpose of the

was Re: about blue dragon. bow: upgrading to mx

2003-09-07 Thread Al Musella, DPM
I am about to upgrade a cf 5 server to cfmx6.1. (running on windows server 2000 and IIS) I tested everything on my laptop, but am worried about surprises. I have a few webistes on the server, and IF there are problems, I need a way to back out to the current version quickly while

RE: How do your ISPs handle CF mappings?

2003-09-07 Thread Josh Trefethen
We run a Linux / CF Hosting Company and always grant mappings. Have been doing so for years. I know of no security issues with doing so. -- Josh Trefethen Exciteworks, Inc http://exciteworks.com -Original Message- From: Mauricio Giraldo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday,

Blank Pages - restoring neo-runtime.xml not helping

2003-09-07 Thread Scott Brady
I was previously running CFMX 6.0 and started getting blank pages served up any time I ran a .cfm page. Since 6.1 had come out, I decided to try uninstalling 6.0 and installing 6.1. That fixed my problem for about a day. I'm now having the same problem. (In the exception log, the error is Runtime

OT: Mach-ii Training in Montreal, Canada

2003-09-07 Thread Stacy Young
Hi folks, Just wanted to gauge the interest in a mach-ii training course if it were to be held in Montreal. (by Hal co.) I'm currently building a business case for this to be held at our facilities here in the city. There would be approximately 8-9 seats available. Timeframe has yet to be

RE: [CFCDev] CFObject Creation Count

2003-09-07 Thread Joe Eugene
Sean, basic feature of how Java works. Normally, you don't have multiple class loaders of course so you never notice. I dont think the above is correct for J2EE Environment. Once the Class loads, its stays loaded...I think this is why we have HOT LOAD features to RE LOAD classes in development

Re: [CFCDev] CFObject Creation Count

2003-09-07 Thread Matt Liotta
I think there might be some mis-understanding above... I am just using CFMX as an interface... The manipulation in done in the Java Class. However, that Java Class is loaded by the same classloader that calls it, so if CFMX is using different classloaders at runtime for the same CFC then

Re: Coldfusion server fail when reboot?

2003-09-07 Thread Sean A Corfield
Sounds like your neo-query.xml file has been corrupted. Shutdown CF, copy neo-query.bak over neo-query.xml and restart CF. You'll find the files in WEB-INF/cfusion/lib. On Sunday, Sep 7, 2003, at 08:59 US/Pacific, John Ho wrote: Thank you all for your help. I think problem from DataSource.

Re: was Re: about blue dragon. bow: upgrading to mx

2003-09-07 Thread Sean A Corfield
On Sunday, Sep 7, 2003, at 10:09 US/Pacific, Al Musella, DPM wrote: Reading you message gave me the idea of installing cfmx using a different port. Then test each website on the new version using that port, and if it is good, move it to port 80. This would let me test each one at my

SSL Cert 40 bit or 128 bit

2003-09-07 Thread David Fafard
I'm on the verisign site and I have the option of getting a 40 bit or 128 bit. Of course the 128 bit is 500.00 more. What do folks usually get? the 128 bit? Thanks, Dave Fafard ~| Archives:

RE: SSL Cert 40 bit or 128 bit

2003-09-07 Thread Jeff Garza
$500 More??? Check out http://www.geotrust.com/resources/ssl_compare.htm. You can get a 128 bit server cert for $159 for 1 year. Thawte has 128 bit web server certs for $199 per year or $350 for two years... Who are you buying from? Jeff -Original Message- From: David Fafard

RE: SSL Cert 40 bit or 128 bit

2003-09-07 Thread cfhelp
http://www.instantssl.com/ $49.00 Rick -Original Message- From: Jeff Garza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 6:44 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: SSL Cert 40 bit or 128 bit $500 More??? Check out http://www.geotrust.com/resources/ssl_compare.htm. You can get a

Re: SSL Cert 40 bit or 128 bit

2003-09-07 Thread cf-talk
I've done instantssl.com as well. Cheap and it works just fine. -Novak - Original Message - From: cfhelp [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 5:14 PM Subject: RE: SSL Cert 40 bit or 128 bit http://www.instantssl.com/ $49.00 Rick

Re: SSL Cert 40 bit or 128 bit

2003-09-07 Thread David Fafard
Well, I checked here: http://www.verisign.com/products/site/secure/index.html got name brand I guess.. no difference in compatibility going with geotrust or instantssl ? Thanks, Dave Fafard - Original Message - From: Jeff Garza [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

Re: SSL Cert 40 bit or 128 bit

2003-09-07 Thread cf-talk
I had no problems at all with Instantssl's certificate... Worked fine in MSIE, Netscape, and Opera... They have a 30 day money back guarantee I believe... so you really don't have anything to worry about. -Novak - Original Message - From: David Fafard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk

Re: SSL Cert 40 bit or 128 bit

2003-09-07 Thread David Fafard
Cool. thanks Novak. I'll give it a 30 day look. dave - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 9:26 PM Subject: Re: SSL Cert 40 bit or 128 bit I had no problems at all with Instantssl's certificate... Worked fine in

Coldfusion server fail when reboot?

2003-09-07 Thread John Ho
I could not find this file neo-query.bak files in WEB-INF/cfusion/lib. I dont see dir cfusion/lib Would you help me out? Thanks ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:4 Subscription:

RE: .NET integration without COM

2003-09-07 Thread Samuel Neff
Matt, For a CFX that was written in Java and then moved to J#, what is the difference in performance (for CFMX version)? This announcements means you can write CFX tags in .NET only, not that you can utilize any .NET assembly as is without writing a CFX wrapper, right? Thanks, Sam

Re: .NET integration without COM

2003-09-07 Thread Matt Liotta
For a CFX that was written in Java and then moved to J#, what is the difference in performance (for CFMX version)? We haven't done any testing, but anecdotal evidence suggests that there is a noticeable performance improvement. I believe this is because the .NET CLR has a better JIT