Pascal,
Yes, timeout immediately. Max timeout settings in the Administrator are set for
1 hour.
Thanks,
Nick
At 02:18 AM 4/20/2004, you wrote:
>What do you mean by not holding? They timeout immediately or after less
>than 2 hours? Did you look at the maximum timeout in the administrator?
>
>Pas
value="test">
-Original Message-
From: Beth Hales [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 21 April 2004 4:15 p.m.
To: CF-Talk
Subject: radio button dbclick attribute
I have a form which has 14 radio buttons to give the user a choice of
different categories. Once they choose o
1. It's not really in the best of taste to resell a prize.
2. This is really (really) off topic for this technical list. Please move it to CF-OT.
Thanks
(I would have posted earlier but I was doing a 3 hour user group on RegEx)
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscri
I have a form which has 14 radio buttons to give the user a choice of different categories. Once they choose one, there is a search button below which will then take them to the action page. I would also like to be able to give the user a choice of double clicking on the radio button chosen to t
I tried doing this and ran into too many variables and it wasn't worth my time so I scrapped it. There are some free sites out there that do some of it (scheduling, wins/losses, etc) and there are some cheap desktop (and even PDA) programs that do it as well. I'm not sure if you'd be able to acce
>>So all those people using IS TRUEIS FALSE are doing it wrong? I dont think so... this is valid and good practice.
Please don't mix up everything: it IS correct to use your statement, because len(...) will be converted to a boolean.
You can use any integer in a boolean _expression_.
What is NOT c
>>Aside from that
error, my statement is correct.
Ok, but temporarily or not, it IS converted, then 4*5 should be converted to true first. Thus the _expression_ should never return 20, the value 20 does not exist anymore.
In the _expression_ (true AND 4*5). the only way it can be evaluated, and th
>>Why should 'a' (a number) be treated as equal to the boolean true, if it's
not treated as equal to the string 'yes',
... hmmm well, may be for the same reason the _expression_ (true AND 4*5) is evaluated to 20 although it should have a boolean value ;-))
--
_
http://sitereview.cwfservice.net/sitereview.jsp
==
We can get rid of spam on your domain! , Anti-spam solutions
http://www.clickdoug.com/mailfilter.cfm
For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com
==
- Original Messag
I'd go with multiple sequential drafts per application. You'd have two
tables, application and application_draft (or whatever). The application
table would house little beyond a user identifier and a primary key. The
application_draft table would contain all the datat in the application.
Every ti
So all those people using IS TRUEIS FALSE are doing it wrong? I dont think so... this is valid and good practice.
This obviously will return "IS TRUE"
Gareth.
[Gareth Edwards] -Original Message-
From: Claude Schneegans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 21 April 2004 9:13 AM
I hope I can explain this clearly. I am working on this application that allows applicants (users) of the program to submit their applications online. After they submit their applications, they can go back and modify their information before the deadline. So far, easy enough right?
Here's whe
Uh, let me get this straight: The only persons or entities prohibited from
selling an NFR product are the ones who do not have it yet. Right?
Must be the three letter thing - like WMD.
At 03:27 PM 4/20/2004 -0700, you wrote:
>Adam wrote
> >NFR = not for _resale_
>
>My understanding of NFR has al
Assuming that there were no implicit coersions in your code, I would agree.
However, there are.
>
> a is truea is not true
Is a a true value?
> a is truea is not true
Is a equal to the string 'yes'
> a is truea is not true
> a is truea is not true
Is a equal to the boolean true?
> a is falsea is
>>how can you argue that 20 is not a valid result from a
boolean _expression_?
Take this code:
a is truea is not true
a is truea is not true
a is truea is not true
a is truea is not true
a is falsea is not false
a is falsea is not false
a is falsea is not false
it shows:
a is true
a is not tru
I have a website that people can login, take a quiz, view their status,
etc...I use cookies to keep track of the users. There is one company that
when people from there login, they are seeing other peoples information
from that company. Does this have something to do with a proxy server
being used?
> Not exacltly, there is no difference either in C, Java, etc.
> But in C or Java, you will never get any integer value as a
> result of a boolean _expression_, you will always get 0 or 1 (or -1)
Actually, in Java, using an integer in a boolean context throws a compile
time error. I believe you
Eric Creese wrote:
> Ok I hae a bunch of mail sitting in my Spool folder. I have bounced IIS and the SMTP server several times. These emails were originally in my Undelivered folder cause SMTP was not started when these emails should have been ran. I just ran an email off the server to another ema
>>In a loosely typed language (which CF is), 20 IS true. There is NO
DIFFERENCE.
A loosely typed laguages means that values may be automatically converted as needed, it does not mean that they all are the same. 20 is NOT true: 20 is converted to true if one looks at it as a boolean value.
>>by C
If you agree that 20 is true, then you implicitly agree that 20 is a boolean
value. With that, how can you argue that 20 is not a valid result from a
boolean _expression_?
barneyb
> -Original Message-
> From: Bryan F. Hogan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 4:11
Adam wrote
>NFR = not for _resale_
My understanding of NFR has always been the final recipient can't sell it. If thats wrong and an initial sale is permitted, then I and a lot of other people here are wrong on this.
So Christian or any other MM person on the list, whats the deal here? Is NFR li
> Ok, our old Dell server needs replacing so we bought a new
> beast with Windows Server 2003. I installed our CF Server
> 4.5.1 and then the CF 5 Server update, which had problems
> finishing. Are there some compatibility issues? Is CF 6.2
> something I can download and use instead. Any help i
Nope, won't get involved there. Thought about it though.
lol,
dave
-Original Message-
From: Ray Champagne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 5:09 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Windows Server 2003
Why don't you put in a bid for the copy that is up for grabs on the
Amen.
Cary Gordon
The Cherry Hill Company
At 08:39 PM 4/20/2004 +, you wrote:
>Susan,
>
>You should sell your copy guilt free. It's your copy and yours alone,
>what you do with it is your business. No, I'm not intrested in buying it.
>It's just no one else's bizness what you do with it.
Something got lost here, I agree 20 is true, that's why I think #(true
and 20)# should return true and not the numeric value of 20.
Barney Boisvert wrote:
> In a loosely typed language (which CF is), 20 IS true. There is NO
> DIFFERENCE.
>
> The implementation (which happens in java, a strongl
Why don't you put in a bid for the copy that is up for grabs on the 'CFMX
for sale' thread?
LOL
Ray
At 06:08 PM 4/20/2004, Dave Koehler wrote:
>Thanks Mark, that's kind of where we're headed.
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Mark W. Breneman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, Apr
You are correct, it's a conversion/coersion, not a cast. Aside from that
error, my statement is correct.
#true and "yes" and 1#
To evaluate this _expression_, CF says:
- is true boolean? Yes.
- is true a true value? Yes.
- can we stop evaluating? No.
- is "yes" boolean? No.
- what is the
Ok I hae a bunch of mail sitting in my Spool folder. I have bounced IIS and the SMTP server several times. These emails were originally in my Undelivered folder cause SMTP was not started when these emails should have been ran. I just ran an email off the server to another email acount using a form
Thanks Mark, that's kind of where we're headed.
-Original Message-
From: Mark W. Breneman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 4:58 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Windows Server 2003
I am *guessing* that CF5 will run on W2k3 server but, I know that it will
not install cor
In a loosely typed language (which CF is), 20 IS true. There is NO
DIFFERENCE.
The implementation (which happens in java, a strongly typed langauge) has to
deal with the actual type of variables, by CF has no concept of boolean vs.
integer. This is a trait of loosely typed languages.
Personally
I am *guessing* that CF5 will run on W2k3 server but, I know that it will
not install correctly and register the ISAPIs for .cfm in IIS 6.
I would highly advise upgrading to CFMX 6.1 if CF5 is not officially
supported on W2k3 server, if this is a production server.
Mark W. Breneman
-Cold Fusion
>>The cast is implicit, so it only happens for the evaluation.
Where does this rule come from?
This could be true for a cast, but it is not even a cast in the occurrence: it is a forced conversion.
Don't forget: a cast is performed during compile, a conversion during execution.
Here the problem is
>> but I would hypothesize that the casting is done to the operand
Actually, this is not really casting here.
Casting was introduced in the C language.
It means changing the type of a variable, in order to make types compatible or as expected, but it DOES not convert the content of the variable.
Y
Is CF5 even supported on Win2k3? I would imagine it's not since it didnt exist when CF5 was out.
-adam
> -Original Message-
> From: David Koehler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 09:37 PM
> To: 'CF-Talk'
> Subject: Windows Server 2003
>
> Ok, our old Dell server
NFR = not for _resale_
if it wasn't sold to begin with then its not being _resold_
(are you saying you've never had an illegal copy of any software?... ever?)
-adam
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 09:10 PM
> To: 'CF-T
Ok, our old Dell server needs replacing so we bought a new beast with Windows Server 2003. I installed our CF Server 4.5.1 and then the CF 5 Server update, which had problems finishing. Are there some compatibility issues? Is CF 6.2 something I can download and use instead. Any help is appreciated.
Agreed but it returns 20 and not true.
Dave Carabetta wrote:
> However, to Johnny Le's original question (at least, as I understood it),
> the fact that it evaluates to a true condition (even if it's 20) is *not* a
> bug.
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
Not only does it have a lot of money, but it doesn't have as many nuns as it
would like. Can we say "Supply and Demand"?
Paul Kenney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
916-212-4359
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 2:11 PM
> To: CF-Talk
If its OK to violate the license agreement and sell a NFR copy, while we're at it lets hijack that busload of nuns and ransom them off. The church has plenty of money, right? Nobody gets hurt; well, really.
I mean, if you can rationalize away a little illegality, why not rationalize away somethi
> Right, the evaluation of true OR true is shortcircuited, but
> AFTER the operator has been checked. The operator is boolean,
> then the last value evaluated must be converted to a boolean
> before it is returned.
Not quite. The cast is implicit, so it only happens for the evaluation.
The val
In these CFUN-04 Interview, Rey Muradaz discusses his talk, which has the
intriguing title: "How Not to Fusebox." and Ben Forta discusses his talk, which
has the title: "Cool stuff that we can't discuss yet". But first some news.
*
Conference and training news
* Ben Forta confirmed as Sun
I'm not a Java programmer, but I would hypothesize that the casting is
done to the operand, but within the "and" operator. Therefore it is
transparent to the user.
--Ben Doom
Claude Schneegans wrote:
> >>you cast as late as possible
>
> Exact, but whenever you cast, you cast to the type inp
Somehow, our site, which only sells cookies, no nudity or profanity, is being
blocked by at least one school system for content.
Does anyone have a list of service providers that provide blocking services?
I'd really like to find out who is blocking us and get us off of that list!
Andy Ousterhou
Darn. I thought I had it.
Thanks for correcting that one.
Jerry Johnson
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/20/04 04:44PM >>>
> It looks like the operator decides the type for the result for
> everything except the AND operator.
>
> Even OR works as you say it should.
>
> #1 + true# 2
> #true + 1#
>>Try
>>#1 or true#
>>That should return 1, not true.
No, the operator is boolean, it then should return true.
>>Someone pointed out that the value returned is the last value evaluated.
In (true or 1) that is true, since it's shortcircuited.
Right, the evaluation of true OR true is shortcircu
I inherited a project today in which someone that used to work here
created a batch of images using the Fireworks MX data driven graphics
wizard and some xml generated using cold fusion.
I was wondering if anyone knew if it was at all possible to call the
functionality of that wizard via command
I've spoken to her, and I hope that she doesn't mind me posting this here... She did not get it via the usergroup. The software is a full commercial version, so she can sell it if she wants. Let's lay this to rest unless you are interested in purchasing the software.
Cheers,
Jeff Garza
Manager
ROFLMFAO ;-)
Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
t. 250.920.8830
e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Macromedia Associate Partner
www.macromedia.com
Yes Susan...by all means sell it if it didn't come from a user group raffle.
If it did you just hurt poor Amy and Ed that are constantly defending user groups to MM...it's an uphill battle and abuse of NFR copies of software will just result in user groups raffling pens instead of software ;-)
Ju
>>you cast as late as possible
Exact, but whenever you cast, you cast to the type inplied by the operator, or the type expected by a function in a parameter.
You NEVER cast the operator to fit one of the operands, which apparently was done here.
--
___
See some
I think that would be even worse since it's almost like the UG is selling
what it received from MM for free as a promotional item, just not directly.
If you want to sell it, great, go sell it on ebay where nobody knows where
you got it and MM isn't paying as much attention (or are they?). I agree
>>why would you use 5*4 in an _expression_?
I suppose the _expression_ was simplified for the sake of the demonstration, from a more complicated algorithm.
--
___
See some cool custom tags here:
http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm
Please se
This is mentioned on page 14 of Ben Forta's certified Macromedia ColdFusion MX Developer Study Guide. He said:
_expression_ may be used with CFML tags as well as in output, so this is valid:
as is
#var2-var1#
This is not the intersting part of CFMX. This is:
You can embed CFML comments in begi
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/20/04 03:55PM >>>
>
> >Interesting. I would have guessed that both sets would have returned the
> >same exact results. That, to me, is indeed a bug.
>
>Dave,
>
>Could you explain why you are sure this is a bug, and not just an
>unexpected casting issue?
Actually, it's n
Adam,
I agree with your comments completely!
Paul Giesenhagen
QuillDesign
- Original Message -
From: Adrocknaphobia
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 3:39 PM
Subject: Re: CFMX for sale
Susan,
You should sell your copy guilt free. It's your copy and yours al
> It looks like the operator decides the type for the result for
> everything except the AND operator.
>
> Even OR works as you say it should.
>
> #1 + true# 2
> #true + 1# 2
> #1 and true# true
> #true and 1# 1
> #true or 1# true
> #true + true# 2
> #true + false# 1
> #true & "a"
The ring cannot be used for good.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Kenney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 3:34 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX for sale
What if the money went back to the User Group for fun events or paid
speakers?
Paul Kenney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
916-
>>If you want a boolean value returned, you can use yesNoForamt()
Well, the purpose of the yesNo() function is to convert a boolean value to a text representation, not to convert an integer which should have been a bolean in the first place.
A _expression_ with two operands and one boolean operato
Although nice I'm pretty sure it would still be illegal..."Not for Resale" right on all the software that has passed through my group ;-)
Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
t. 250.920.8830
e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Susan,
You should sell your copy guilt free. It's your copy and yours alone, what you do with it is your business. No, I'm not intrested in buying it. It's just no one else's bizness what you do with it.
I think it's commendable that you offered through this list to developers who will use it
You all have convinced me.
It looks like the operator decides the type for the result for everything except the AND operator.
Even OR works as you say it should.
#1 + true# 2
#true + 1# 2
#1 and true# true
#true and 1# 1
#true or 1# true
#true + true# 2
#true + false# 1
#true & "a
What if the money went back to the User Group for fun events or paid
speakers?
Paul Kenney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
916-212-4359
> -Original Message-
> From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 11:24 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: CFMX for sale
>
>
> I seco
I disagree. Whether I would consider it a bug or not depends on when
things are expected get cast. Typically, in a loosely-typed language,
you cast as late as possible, and avoid it whenever you can.
In this case, the language is avoiding implicit casting, which is (IMHO)
a good thing. Espec
>>You are anding a boolean and an integer, and getting an integer out.
This IS the bug, a loosely interpretor should always convert operands to fit the operator, not the contrary.
If you are anding a boolean and an integer, the and is a boolean operator, the boolean is ok, the integer is the alien
I am curious on how one would go about using this in "real life". If you're
looking for a boolean result then why would you use 5*4 in an _expression_?
Mark W. Breneman
-Cold Fusion Developer
-Network Administrator
Vivid Media
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.vividmedia.com
608.270.9770
_
I get two true values followed by two false values for both blocks. The
specific true and false values are varied, but they are still equivalent.
This block is as well:
#1 and 100#
#false or 10#
#false or 0#
#0 and false#
If you want a boolean value returned, you can use yesNoForamt(), though
In general, boolean expressions should return boolean values
(yes,no,true,false). This is a bug.
Paul Kenney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
916-212-4359
> -Original Message-
> From: Samuel R. Neff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 1:20 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Is it a b
Claude Schneegans wrote:
> >>20 *is* true.
>
> A little precison: 20 EVALUATES to true when it is converted, but 20 is
> 20 and true is true.
Point taken. Definately important if you ever compare things to "true".
--Ben Doom
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubsc
>>it'll return the last value evaluated in the _expression_.
This IS the bug: it should return the type implied by the operator in the _expression_.
in true and 4*5, CF has a boolean and a boolean operator, It thus has to evaluate 4*5, THEN convert it to a boolean in order to complete the boolean
Off the top of my head, I would suggest using .
Doug
Austin Govella wrote:
>I have a listing of classes, each with a text box next to
>them. Users will fill in a number in the text box next to
>each class and then hit submit.
>
>I'm trying to loop through the results and INSERT a
>class_id, s
If class_enrollment is an int (or similar), you could be getting an
error because of the wrapping single quotes.
And before someone else says it, cfsqlparam is a good thing.
--Ben Doom
Austin Govella wrote:
> I have a listing of classes, each with a text box next to
> them. Users will fill in
"and" is a boolean operator. I would expect the result to always be a
boolean.
In my opinion, it's a bug.
Sam
Blog http://www.rewindlife.com
TeamMM http://www.macromedia.com/go/team
> -Original Message-
If you are asking whether it is true or false, then it is true. But if you ask what is value of that _expression_, then it is 20. I think that is two different questions. So you get two different answers.
Johnny
>Run this:
>
>truefalse
>truefalse
>truefalse
>truefalse
>
>#true and (4*5)#
>#(4*
>>This is not a bug, it's just part of using a loosely typed language.
Well... your right that it is part of using a loosely typed language, this implies that the language has to convert automatcally variables and expressions in order to perform a statement, but when the laguage converts to the wr
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/20/04 03:55PM >>>
>Interesting. I would have guessed that both sets would have returned the
>same exact results. That, to me, is indeed a bug.
Dave,
Could you explain why you are sure this is a bug, and not just an unexpected casting issue?
Why should #1 and 20# automa
I have a listing of classes, each with a text box next to
them. Users will fill in a number in the text box next to
each class and then hit submit.
I'm trying to loop through the results and INSERT a
class_id, section number, enrollment number, and date for
each class.
I use the following cod
>>20 *is* true.
A little precison: 20 EVALUATES to true when it is converted, but 20 is 20 and true is true.
--
___
See some cool custom tags here:
http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm
Please send any spam to this address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For what it's worth, your site (atcc.org) is coming up with this error
>right now:
Thanks for trying Bret, we were able to correct the problem by doing a restore from a backup.
thx again,
larry
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
It wouldn't surprise me if it disappeared again in a future version.
It used to be in CF3.x, and was removed in CF4.x.
Sure is handy though.
- Original Message -
From: "Mark W. Breneman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 1:46 pm
Subject: RE: Is it a bug or not a bug?
> I
>
>Run this:
>
>truefalse
>truefalse
>truefalse
>truefalse
>
>#true and (4*5)#
>#(4*5) and true#
>#false and (4*5)#
>#(4*5) and false#
>
I get:
true
true
false
false
20
true
false
false
Interesting. I would have guessed that both sets would have returned the
same exact results. That, to me, is
For what it's worth, your site (atcc.org) is coming up with this error
right now:
Error Diagnostic Information
An error occurred while attempting to establish a connection to the server.
The most likely cause of this problem is that the server is not
currently running. Verify that the server is
I don't know, I could be wrong on it being supported. But I deff have
not heard of it not being supported. It does seem to be broken in this
case though.
I don't know what you would call it. Output Expressioning? ;-)
Mark W. Breneman wrote:
> I thought I had seen someone on this list, when MX
> >>#(true and 4*5)# returns 20.
> >>#(false and 4*5)# returns false.
> >>#(4*5 and false)# returns false.
> >>#(4*5 and true)# returns true.
> >>
> >>Is it a bug or it is using some sort of _expression_ evaluation that I am
>not
> >>aware of.
> >>
> >
> >CF uses short-circuit boolean evaluation.
I thought I had seen someone on this list, when MX came out, warning
everyone to not use it due to it broke a convention (or something like that)
and it may not be supported in the future versions due to MM did not
officially acknowledge it as a feature. So thus I tried to not use it, but
I did fi
Run this:
truefalse
truefalse
truefalse
truefalse
#true and (4*5)#
#(4*5) and true#
#false and (4*5)#
#(4*5) and false#
Barney Boisvert wrote:
> This is not a bug, it's just part of using a loosely typed language.
> Non-zero values are true, and zero is false. A short-circuited boolean
> evalu
>Does MM officially support performing mathematical calculations between #
>signs? I was sorta under the impression that this was considered not a good
>practice. Regardless it is handy.
>
As of CFMX you can. Good or bad practice is your call though.
Regards,
Dave.
[Todays Threads]
[This Messa
Yes, this is fully functioning in CFMX, but I believe not in previous versions.
Johnny
>Does MM officially support performing mathematical calculations between #
>signs? I was sorta under the impression that this was considered not a good
>practice. Regardless it is handy.
>
>
>
>Mark W. Brenema
Greetings,
Have a problem with our current CF5 server on a unix box. All of our data sources have disappeared. I have no idea why. Nothing has been changed on the server for the last while. Moreover, when I try to add a datasource again, the Admin app says that the datasource is already there.
An
This is not a bug, it's just part of using a loosely typed language.
Non-zero values are true, and zero is false. A short-circuited boolean
evaluation returns the value of the last _expression_ that is evaluated.
Note, that whether the first test returns 'true' or '20', both are true
values, so i
Yes I'm sure they do. I don't know about good or bad, I really haven't
thought about it. It does work.
Mark W. Breneman wrote:
> Does MM officially support performing mathematical calculations between #
> signs? I was sorta under the impression that this was considered not a good
> practice. Reg
> >>#(true and 4*5)# returns 20.
> >>#(false and 4*5)# returns false.
> >>#(4*5 and false)# returns false.
> >>#(4*5 and true)# returns true.
> >>
> >>Is it a bug or it is using some sort of _expression_ evaluation that I
> am not
> >>aware of.
> >>
> >
> >CF uses short-circuit boolean e
Chris,
I actually just finished doing something like this. It allows for different
divisions (age groups) and then teams in every division. You can create
divisions, teams, and then create games for those teams. You can re-schedule
games, have field information, etc. It will also calculate standin
- Original Message -
From: "Westin, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 5:14 PM
Subject: Http to https redirect
>
> OK so I have an application which I only want people to connect to using
> SSL, so I want to have it so that if anyone co
IIRC, this is new in CFMX.
Doug
-Original Message-
From: Mark W. Breneman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 3:15 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Is it a bug or not a bug?
Does MM officially support performing mathematical calculations between #
signs? I was sorta unde
Chris,
I actually just finished doing something like this. It allows for different
divisions (age groups) and then teams in every division. You can create
divisions, teams, and then create games for those teams. You can re-schedule
games, have field information, etc. It will also calculate standin
>>#(true and 4*5)# returns 20.
>>#(false and 4*5)# returns false.
>>#(4*5 and false)# returns false.
>>#(4*5 and true)# returns true.
>>
>>Is it a bug or it is using some sort of _expression_ evaluation that I am not
>>aware of.
>>
>
>CF uses short-circuit boolean evaluation. So it'll either stop
Does MM officially support performing mathematical calculations between #
signs? I was sorta under the impression that this was considered not a good
practice. Regardless it is handy.
Mark W. Breneman
-Cold Fusion Developer
-Network Administrator
Vivid Media
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.vividmedia.
Yes it's a bug, I have submitted it. Use #((4*5) and true)# until it
get's fixed.
Johnny Le wrote:
> #(true and 4*5)# returns 20.
> #(false and 4*5)# returns false.
> #(4*5 and false)# returns false.
> #(4*5 and true)# returns true.
>
> Is it a bug or it is using some sort of _expression_ evalu
true = 1 = yes
false = 0 = no
afair
-Original Message-
From: Johnny Le [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 2:59 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Is it a bug or not a bug?
#(true and 4*5)# returns 20.
#(false and 4*5)# returns false.
#(4*5 and false)# returns false.
#(4*5 and
>#(true and 4*5)# returns 20.
>#(false and 4*5)# returns false.
>#(4*5 and false)# returns false.
>#(4*5 and true)# returns true.
>
>Is it a bug or it is using some sort of _expression_ evaluation that I am not
>aware of.
>
CF uses short-circuit boolean evaluation. So it'll either stop the moment
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
