Glad to hear you're safe. Good luck in getting back on your feet...
Cheers from the north,
Kevin
- Original Message -
From: S.Isaac Dealey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 11:02 AM
Subject: OT: We're Okay
Hi all,
Tiff and I
I'm using Crystal Tech's scheduled task feature in their control panel -
however the template I'm trying to schedule won't execute b/c the
directory its in requires a login (via application.cfm)
I've even tried adding code to the top of the page that is scheduled to
indicate that the user is
In a very similar situation, I've allowed ^t to stand for a tab; just
replace when the page is submitted. Some editors use that shorthand in
replace dlogs, so it's not completely foreign.
Dave Merrill
From: Ryan Guill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well im looking for an actual tab character.
Move the file to a folder that is not protected by a login.
The application.cfm will run b4 the file in question otherwise, and if this
is where your login check is, the file will never get executed.
Russ
-Original Message-
From: Tim Laureska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 November
Yeah... thought of that but didn't want to leave that template hanging
out there unprotected... I think I may have worked it out... application
file wasn't working right... we'll see when that task comes up for
execution again... thanks for the suggestion tho
Tim
-Original Message-
Hi Les,
I would also look at enabling full-text search on (I am assuming) SQL Server
and using the CONTAINS clause. You might still have to filter out the 'The',
but it might also help on other situations.
George
On 11/12/05, Adrian Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If The is the only word
I'm finding that urls with both parameters and a named anchor, like this:
somesite/somedir/somefile.cfm?method=goaction=showHelp#help_sql
work fine in Firefox, but not in IE. It goes to the page, but not to the
requested anchor.
Also tried this variant:
Sadly doesn't mind working on a windows machine rules out
a lot more than just Sean. Not to belittle the work they've
done in any way (from what I understand, it's pretty impressive),
but using Java, Ruby, Python, etc. rather than .NET would
have made for a much larger target audience.
Here is my delima. Our application used to call a com object via an .asp page.
Now we have rewritten it to call the object via a .cfm page. The program takes
information submitted online and makes a text file that is then sent to 1 of 6
report servers to produce the information via an online
As your title suggests, this could well be a cf locking problem, but you
have not mentioned anywhere whether you are actually cflocking.
If you are then this would caus eaccess to be single threaded.
Russ
-Original Message-
From: brad f [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 November 2005
Thanks Barney. After I posted this, I noticed that even though I could
specify the length when creating the field, when I saved the table, it
reverted back to the default. Guess I should have tried that first.
Thanks for the other info, that is very helpful.
Ray
Barney Boisvert wrote:
If
Yep, you're correct about only the IDE requiring windows. But PLUM
itself only supports MSSQL, Access and Oracle 9i. Granted, Oracle
isn't Windows-only, but it's also massively non-free. You might be
able to develop on one of those, and then deploy to something else,
but it'd undoubtedly be a
Hey, just for the record, I sent this out yesterday at 10:30 am. Don't know
why it didn't post til today (most likely on my side since everyone elses
posts came through). I am sorry about the triple post, only meant to post
once, but posted again when I noticed it was not comming through.
Mark
On 11/11/05, Mark Fuqua [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really can't believe Ruby would be/could be quicker than PLUM.
Nor can I. RoR requires you manually generate controllers, models and
scaffolding. If you want a nicely formatted page / form, you need to
write it yourself since the defaults are
Had an interesting issue come up on Friday - I had sent some code to a
client for a small job I was working on and got a message back that
there was a syntax error. I replied that it had not happened on my
setup and showed them via a series of screen shots; they replied with
a screen shot of the
Yup, it was something that cropped up back when CF6 came out. Putting code
from 6 to 5 highlighted this.
Ade
-Original Message-
From: C. Hatton Humphrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 November 2005 19:12
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Error found by CF45 but Not CFMX7?
Had an interesting
On 11/13/05, Sean Corfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/11/05, Mark Fuqua [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really can't believe Ruby would be/could be quicker than PLUM.
Nor can I. RoR requires you manually generate controllers, models and
scaffolding. If you want a nicely formatted page / form,
On 11/13/05, Marlon Moyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would say it's probably the most common type of web app deployed today.
Possibly but the trend is to more complex business applications, IMO.
RoR doesn't need any special editor other than notepad and a command line.
Right, but PLUM does
Hi,
I'm trying to implement XMLHttpRequest in an application which send data
to a CF template using the post method.
The send function is:
xmlhttp.send(messageSent= + messageToSend)
The CF template is called, but in which scope will it receive the
messageSent variable?
I've tryied form, url,
Les Mizzell wrote:
what I *do* have is a problem on
the hosting end. So far, this client ain't moving, so I've got to put up
with the hosting in question.
Ouch. This is a shared server, then? If so, then 3000 emails is
roughly 13 minutes at the 250ms second timeout you were mentioning.
Will
You could say its no longer an error. I ran into this back when MX
came out. I was developing on a 6.0 dev box and porting live to a
4.5.1 box.
Not something you want to build into your code from scratch, but in a
pinch this loosening of the reins can be very handy. I am now porting
a CF5 app
Hatton,
Basically, what you are doing inside the loop is unnecessary, you already
have a cfoutput on the page.
In previous version of CF the only time you were allowed to nest cfoutputs
was inside a grouped query output. Now they've basically removed the check
from CFMX and beyond so that it is
If you are POSTING a form (for lack of a better word) 'object', it'll be in
the form scope.
It looks like your just trying to send a simple message though? If so just
change your method to 'GET' and you'll find it in the URL scope.
..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
Bobby Hartsfield
it should show up in the form scope. Are you setting the request
header like such:
xmlhttp.setRequestHeader(Content-Type, application/x-www-form-urlencoded);
What's the calling function look like? Are you using any of the
xmlHttp Ajax libraries?
On 11/13/05, Claude Schneegans [EMAIL
Hey all. I'm having an issue where visitors to my site are losing their
session variables when I transfer them from www.mysite.com
http://www.mysite.com/ to secure.mysite.com. Basically, all of the
session vars are lost, including the fact that they are logged in, items in
their cart, etc. Short
xmlhttp.setRequestHeader(Content-Type,
application/x-www-form-urlencoded);
Ah ah! I missed this one. Ok, gonna try id.
What's the calling function look like? Are you using any of the
xmlHttp Ajax libraries?
No, because I don't actually need xml, and I can parse messages by
myself, the only
It looks like your just trying to send a simple message though? If so
just
change your method to 'GET' and you'll find it in the URL scope.
For the time being, the text is rather small, but I may have much more
to pass, including several variables, since I don't expect the session
variables
Anyone know how to manaually enable the CF performance
monitoring in windows. For some reason it doesn't appear
to have been installed, and cfstat is not anywhere on
the server.
If you're running CFMX on JRun, you don't have cfstat. Instead, you can use
JRun's Metrics:
It looks like ANY variable in the cgi scope is always defined, ie: CFIF
isdefined (CGI.anythingYouPutHere)
is always true, and #CGI.anythingYouPutHere# always return an empty string.
CFIF isdefined (CGI.whateverYouPutHere)
CFOUTPUTCGI.whateverYouPutHere = [#CGI.whateverYouPutHere#]/CFOUTPUT
Yes, this is normal. Application servers cannot know what CGI variables
are passed to it. In fact, if you loop over all CGI variables using
ASP, you get many of the same CGI variables, but you get quite a few
more.
The best you can do is check for specific values or for empty strings.
You
Does anyone know how to populate a form field which resides on a
differant server but pulled in via an iframe?
jonese
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking
application. Start tracking and
I'm trying to implement XMLHttpRequest in an application
which send data to a CF template using the post method.
The send function is:
xmlhttp.send(messageSent= + messageToSend)
The CF template is called, but in which scope will it
receive the messageSent variable? I've tryied form, url,
Forget it : URL, of course! ;-)
--
___
REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm
(Please send any spam to this address: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Thanks.
Let's try this again... my last message doesnt seem to be coming through.
You can POST a form 'object' which will be in the form scope on the cf page
you are posting to.
I usually keep xmlhttprequests pretty simple and hardly ever post forms
since I USUALLY have to write a non-js version for
Ike,
Glad to hear you got in safe and sorry to hear about the car troubles. Hope
you get settled soon so I can pester you with more pointless questions
(though it will be hard since your not in yelling range).
Rich
Rich Kroll
Application Developer
-Original Message-
From: S. Isaac
-Original Message-
From: jonese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 9:12 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: OT: Javascript Iframe question
Does anyone know how to populate a form field which resides on a
differant server but pulled in via an iframe?
Simple answer is
36 matches
Mail list logo
