web servers - apache or IIS

2006-12-23 Thread Richard White
hi, i am about to deploy my first coldfusion application within my clients site but have been asked the question in regard to the best web server. I havent really done alot of research on web servers, am doing some now but would be extremely grateful of some expert advice. I know my client

Re: web servers - apache or IIS

2006-12-23 Thread Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
IIS is for sure good enough, it is literally down to preference now. IIS is certainly the easier to config I think. This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Gateway House, 28 The Quadrant, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DN, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business, Registered in England, Number

RE: web servers - apache or IIS

2006-12-23 Thread Snake
Unless you have any very specific reason to use Apache, as in a feature that IIS does not support, then there is no reason not to use IIS if your running on windows, it will do everything you need. The most common reason people always had to use Apache was mod_rewrite, but this now exists for IIS

Re: web servers - apache or IIS

2006-12-23 Thread Doug Brown
Is there not alot more security concern for IIS as compared to Apache? I have always heard this, so have always ran Apache on my windows server. Things may have changed in IIS with the release of windows 2003 server. Doug B.

Re: web servers - apache or IIS

2006-12-23 Thread Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
Not any more, maybe 3 of 4 years ago. This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Gateway House, 28 The Quadrant, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DN, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business, Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is confidential and may also be

RE: web servers - apache or IIS

2006-12-23 Thread Snake
Only if you leave your server wide open, don't have a hav a firewall and never patch it. -Original Message- From: Doug Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 December 2006 13:09 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: web servers - apache or IIS Is there not alot more security concern for IIS as

Re: newbie: Tools to use with MySQL

2006-12-23 Thread James Holmes
I normally use this for my MySQL work. I recently tried Navicat; I can say that navicat is faster by far and I find it generally better to work with. On 12/23/06, Michael E. Carluen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dwayne, The mySQL Administrator http://www.mysql.com/products/tools/administrator/

Re: get server uptime and # of requests

2006-12-23 Thread Raymond Camden
getMetricData can return the number of requests: http://www.cfquickdocs.com/?getDoc=GetMetricData On 12/22/06, John Blayter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have Fusion Reactor EE installed on my production environment but want to develop a mobile website for management so they can see the uptime

Re: web servers - apache or IIS

2006-12-23 Thread Jacob Munson
I know my client would prefer to use an IIS web server, in order for it to sit on a windows server platform. This is a common misconception, Apache does run on Windows, in fact IIRC, most Apache installs out there are on Windows servers, and Apache currently holds 70% of the web server market

RE: newbie: Tools to use with MySQL

2006-12-23 Thread Eric Roberts
Phpmyadmin is awesome. Their MySQL Workbench and MySQL Administrator are also not bad. They can be dl'd at MySQL.org. I wish there was a decent CF version of PHPMyAdmin. I ran across a CFMyAdmin a while back and it really sucked unfortunately. It had a lot of potential, but it didn't work.

RE: web servers - apache or IIS

2006-12-23 Thread Jim Davis
-Original Message- From: Richard White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2006 4:10 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: web servers - apache or IIS hi, i am about to deploy my first coldfusion application within my clients site but have been asked the question in regard to

RE: web servers - apache or IIS

2006-12-23 Thread Bobby Hartsfield
Well put as usual Jim. -Original Message- From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2006 2:58 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: web servers - apache or IIS -Original Message- From: Richard White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 23,

RE: web servers - apache or IIS

2006-12-23 Thread Eric Roberts
I would say if you are hosting on Windows, go with IIS as IIS was made to work with windows. If you are going with UNIX/LINUX...go with Apache. Eric -Original Message- From: Bobby Hartsfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, 23 December 2006 16:05 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: web

Re: get server uptime and # of requests

2006-12-23 Thread Douglas Knudsen
IIRC, getMetricsData only works on standalone installs, not the J2EE install path. DK On 12/23/06, Raymond Camden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: getMetricData can return the number of requests: http://www.cfquickdocs.com/?getDoc=GetMetricData On 12/22/06, John Blayter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

RE: web servers - apache or IIS

2006-12-23 Thread Bobby Hartsfield
I'd say that the fact that there is even a choice rules out Linux. Only Windows gives an option between the two. But either way, both run just as well on Windows so you're still left with the only thing that really matters... which one you know more about. -Original Message- From: Eric

RE: web servers - apache or IIS

2006-12-23 Thread Dave Watts
Is there not alot more security concern for IIS as compared to Apache? I have always heard this, so have always ran Apache on my windows server. Things may have changed in IIS with the release of windows 2003 server. IIS 6 is adequately secure by default. IIS 5 was not, but could easily

RE: web servers - apache or IIS

2006-12-23 Thread Dave Watts
I know my client would prefer to use an IIS web server, in order for it to sit on a windows server platform. Do most people use IIS with Coldfusion? can anybody tell me if this is adequate or whether i should really be pushing for a different environment? As several people have

RE: Web App Security Testing

2006-12-23 Thread michael acadia
Yes - it's a great tool, but can be difficult to figure out when you're first working with it (I'm not using the most recent version; it might be easier now). I know I'm not using it to its full potential - there's a lot packed into it. If you're planning to use it with Firefox, you should