I'm trying to set up ColdFusion 9 in distributed mode (again, on some other
servers). As soon as I add the jrun_iis6_wildcard.dll ISAPI filter, a call to
an HTML file will fail. As soon as I remove the filter, it succeeds.
I thought that .html and .htm files were not served by a filter but di
sorry, OT.
"Ripple in still water-- when there is no pebble tossed, or wind to blow--"
I heard an interview with Garcia about this song once--
Jerry said something like--
To me "Ripple" is a reflection of all the things that "just are"-- and how
when we observe things in particular states of mi
> If I'm passing an URL Variable - with the variable name itself being
> dynamic, what's the best was to extract the variable name (not the
> value) on the receiving page?
>
> As in:
> for: index.cfm?somevar=somevalue
> I need to return "somevar" on the receiving page as a value.
>
> or for: index
or: index.cfm?bigdog=bruto
I need to return "bigdog" on the receiving page as a value.
The receiving page won't know what the variable is in advance...
Did that make any sense at all?
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5263 (20
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Michael Grant wrote:
>
> I see. My bad.
> To be fair I find Denny hard to follow at the best of times. :D
A snippet from a favorite song:
If my words did glow with the gold of sunshine
And my tunes were played on the harp unstrung
Would you hear my voice come thro
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Dave Watts wrote:
>
>> I would want to do len(trim(string)) gt 0 or trim(string) != "" since
>> technically " " fulfills your if condition though remains undesirable.
>
> I think his point is that CF, unlike some other languages, supports
> implicit Boolean evaluati
I see. My bad.
To be fair I find Denny hard to follow at the best of times. :D
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Dave Watts wrote:
>
> > I would want to do len(trim(string)) gt 0 or trim(string) != "" since
> > technically " " fulfills your if condition though remains undesirable.
>
> I think h
> I would want to do len(trim(string)) gt 0 or trim(string) != "" since
> technically " " fulfills your if condition though remains undesirable.
I think his point is that CF, unlike some other languages, supports
implicit Boolean evaluation. Some people really don't like it.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig
So /that's/ why my ascii art is all mangled! ;]
,
- \O , .-.___
- /\ O/ /xx\XXX\
- __/\ ` /\ |xx|XXX|
`\, () ` << |xx|XXX|
j
I would want to do len(trim(string)) gt 0 or trim(string) != "" since
technically " " fulfills your if condition though remains undesirable.
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 9:41 PM, denstar wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Michael Grant wrote:
> >
> > I for one think CF should have stuck to z
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Michael Grant wrote:
>
> I for one think CF should have stuck to zero based indices.
> I've thought for close to 10 years that it would be AWESOME if this could be
> a CFAdmin setting.
It's never really bothered me much, and I do a lot a java/cfml stuphs.
What's r
I for one think CF should have stuck to zero based indices.
I've thought for close to 10 years that it would be AWESOME if this could be
a CFAdmin setting.
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Josh Nathanson wrote:
>
> > So, you don't clearly appear to be in favor of CF
> > behaving differently fro
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Dave Watts wrote:
...
> This is basically the argument for COBOL, and look how that turned
> out. If you want to be a competent programmer, right now, you need to
> understand pretty well how computers work. That may not be the case in
> the future, but it is right
> So, you don't clearly appear to be in favor of CF
> behaving differently from lower-level languages.
Sorry I was not clear. Yes, I am in favor of CFML behaving differently, and
I think from a human perspective, 1-based indices make sense. When I said
"A whole other discussion is whether it wa
> Obviously, Dave. I was referring to higher level languages, where a
> decision can be made (and has been in the case of CFML) to use a more
> "humanist" approach to array indexing.
I'm confused. Aren't you the same guy who a few minutes ago wrote "A
whole other discussion is whether it was sma
Obviously, Dave. I was referring to higher level languages, where a
decision can be made (and has been in the case of CFML) to use a more
"humanist" approach to array indexing.
-- Josh
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:dwa...@figleaf.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 4:01 P
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Dave Watts wrote:
>
>> Yeah, that may be the explanation, but IMO it's still dumb to do arrays that
>> way. Nobody calls their thumb their "zeroth" finger.
>
> Computers are different from hands, programming languages are
> different from natural languages, compute
> Yeah, that may be the explanation, but IMO it's still dumb to do arrays that
> way. Nobody calls their thumb their "zeroth" finger.
Computers are different from hands, programming languages are
different from natural languages, computers don't "understand" base-10
math.
http://en.wikipedia.or
Anytime.
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Matt Blatchley wrote:
>
> This just keeps getting better.
>
> Thanks of the point in the right direction John. Again :)
>
> Matt
>
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 5:20 PM, John M Bliss wrote:
> >
> >
> http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api/browse_thread/t
Yeah, that may be the explanation, but IMO it's still dumb to do arrays that
way. Nobody calls their thumb their "zeroth" finger.
A whole other discussion is whether it was smart for CFML to "correct" this
issue.
-- Josh
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:dwa...@figleaf.com]
This just keeps getting better.
Thanks of the point in the right direction John. Again :)
Matt
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 5:20 PM, John M Bliss wrote:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api/browse_thread/thread/f673f0a25bfa6885
>
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Matt Blatchley wrote:
>
>
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api/browse_thread/thread/f673f0a25bfa6885
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Matt Blatchley wrote:
>
> So I ran into another issue with the API once I got it pulling real
> data in the production environment.
>
> I'm trying to pull out Impressions, Cost, CPC,
> I'm sorry - but I still say the guy who invented arrays was drunk and
> came up with the "its an offset" excuse later on to explain the whole
> 0 based thing.
I think a simpler explanation is that it's pretty significant in binary.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
htt
So I ran into another issue with the API once I got it pulling real
data in the production environment.
I'm trying to pull out Impressions, Cost, CPC, CPM, etc...
When I get the data back it shows cost as 1691 instead of 16.91.
How am I supposed to know that it's not 169.10 and not 16.91?
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Dave Watts wrote:
> One-based indexes don't make any more sense with tags than they do
> with script, either - if you're new to programming entirely, they seem
> acceptable, but if you have any prior programming experience they
> don't seem like such a good idea
> Why they decided to start the index at 1 and not allow relational or
> assignment operators is completely baffling. It makes sense
> with tags but not with script.
CFSCRIPT isn't an entirely separate language from CFML. It has
different syntax and statements, but shares the same operators, and
Unfortunately, its being demanded here, so its gotta be done. Anyone else have
any success with facebook connect?
>And that's why I'm pretty negative on integrating with Facebook. We created
>an app 2 years ago and could never get the functionality of processing some
>of our code after someon
>See how easy everything is in CF?
Coldfusion is different:
function manageRecipes(){
for(i=1;i lte RecipesQuery.recordcount;i++){
recipes[i].manage();
}
}
I've been writing a lot of JavaScript lately.
Why they decided to start the index at 1 and not allow relational or assignm
Thanks Reed,
I'm glad to hear that will get easier in the next version. I also
continue to read that the API is suppsed to be free in the next 90
days? Is that another urban legand? I can't imagine Goolge making it
free after they just up'd the price a little while ago.
Matt
~~~
>It for a SaS, so it would have to run reports continuously for x
>number of clients on the system. You think that would still be
>something that would work if I had multiple tasks setup for each
>client on the system?
>
>You ever run into reliability issues with the Reports coming back
>empty or
The process you described is that of the V13 release of the AdWords API. They
have recently released the V2010 Beta of the reporting service, and life is
much simpler, although they have not yet moved all of the V13 reporting
functionality to V2010 (and some of the old functionality is probabl
31 matches
Mail list logo
