Thanks for that reminder... it's been years since
I've even used cflocation! My how knowledge, unused,
is fleeting...
-Original Message-
From: Azadi Saryev [mailto:azadi.sar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 9:20 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Session variables not working
In
I normally use an application.cfc, but this was just a quick
proof-of-concept that I threw together to test something.
-Original Message-
From: James Holmes [mailto:james.hol...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 10:56 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Session variables not working
Thanks, Jay!
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Jay Pandya [mailto:jaypandy...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 12:49 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Session variables not working
Hi Rick,
When you are using session variables and you want to get its value
in other page
Are there any programs out there that will remove all CF comments from your
code??
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
You can just do a find/replace with CFBuilder. It allows for wildcards
so just do
!---*---
and replace it with
-J.J.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Chad Baloga cbal...@gmail.com wrote:
Are there any programs out there that will remove all CF comments from your
code??
This is a pretty simple task to script, but why would one wish to remove all
comments? That seems like a poor practice.
--
~ Mike Stemle, Jr.
On Feb 28, 2012, at 6:57, Chad Baloga cbal...@gmail.com wrote:
Are there any programs out there that will remove all CF comments from your
code??
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Michael Stemle themanchic...@gmail.comwrote:
This is a pretty simple task to script, but why would one wish to remove
all comments? That seems like a poor practice.
because code should be self explanatory hahaha.
When you arrive in Heaven with all the perfect code,please send us a
postcard. ;)
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Casey Dougall - Uber Website
Solutions ca...@uberwebsitesolutions.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Michael Stemle
themanchic...@gmail.comwrote:
This is a pretty
Try TDD. The unit tests express the design for the code; comments are
therefore unnecessary.
--
Shu Ha Ri: Agile and .NET blog
http://www.bifrost.com.au/
On 28 February 2012 22:04, Raymond Camden raymondcam...@gmail.com wrote:
When you arrive in Heaven with all the perfect code,please send
I think you can use 2 column layout html template Using Dreamweaver
Well, I suppose that it is simply some table in which one can fill in some text
by hand.
I know haow to designe a two column page in HTML, the problem is to have it
automatically generated from a database.
What I was thinking
This reminds me of the time that Ruby's developers told me that unit tests
obsoleted debuggers. This is silliness. Until unit tests can convey
developer intent, comments will remain useful.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 08:16, James Holmes james.hol...@gmail.com wrote:
Try TDD. The unit tests
The realistic problem that you'll find in this is nested comments. You
can't just delete anything between !--- and --- as you don't know
what is actually within that range. I use a regex that tests for how
deep the comments in an application goes. Then I use another set to
remove nested blocks
Based upon what I have seen, I would say that legit comments inside of
commented-out code is extremely common.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Michael Dinowitz
mdino...@houseoffusion.com wrote:
I know that we all remove unused code and don't comment it out. I know
we all use best
I know that we all remove unused code and don't comment it out. I know
we all use best practices in commenting code.
Lets assume you were working on someone elses application that did not
do these things and had comments in their code comments. How deeply
nested have you seen comments on average?
Are you sure it is a problem with the cfc? The first thing to check is whether
your data is stored properly as unicode. If you output the characters on
screen, do they display properly?
I have never used cfHSSF, but all three (cfHSSF, POUtitlity and cfspreadsheet)
use POI internally. So the
I would not say it is the CFC, rather I would say it's POI or I should Unicode
the data before sending it to POI.
I am using CF8 , will test it out on different version and get back. Also
noticed that this issue also exists if use a cfheader with excel, will post
some samples in the morning
If I had to change something temporarily by commenting it out, I'd be
wanting to leave any comments in the code. That way, if i ended up
UNcommenting it again, the restored routine would still have the comments
in it.If that segment of code is permanently disabled, I'd probably
remove it,
Really good tests and self explanatory code do exactly that. Any code that
isn't self explanatory is too complex and needs to be re-factored.
Code that's so obscure that it needs a comment is silliness.
--
Shu Ha Ri: Agile and .NET blog
http://www.bifrost.com.au/
On 28 February 2012 23:32,
We are in disagreement. Some of us actually use comments as a way of planning
and maintaining our code. This is coming across as religious belief or
trolling, not actual development or engineering. If we continue I'm virtually
certain we will break out into an argument on tabs versus spaces
Yes, I've seen code commented out with commented out code in it.
Steps to fix:
1) Commit to Git
2) Delete everything that's been commented out.
--
Shu Ha Ri: Agile and .NET blog
http://www.bifrost.com.au/
On 29 February 2012 01:03, Michael Dinowitz mdino...@houseoffusion.comwrote:
I know
It hasn't been said but with eclipse these become more than
breadcrumbs. the TODO: comment allows for task tracking of left overs
also.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Michael Stemle themanchic...@gmail.com wrote:
We are in disagreement. Some of us actually use comments as a way of planning
tabs inserted as 2 spaces ;-)
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 18:45 -0600, Michael Stemle wrote:
We are in disagreement. Some of us actually use comments as a way of planning
and maintaining our code. This is coming across as religious belief or
trolling, not actual development or engineering. If we
C'mon, doods and doodettes. Will someone just step up and say it the way it
really is?
Bah, no one else will, so here goes.
Anyone that puts comments in their code OR writes/generates/runs unit tests
for their code is obviously a complete ID10T wannabe. Real programmers
drink beer, watch
Back in the day (it was a tuesday i think) Mike and Judith had the
idea to let us HOF users upload a photo of our fugly mug selfs...
I thought this would be a reminder that all should feel welcome to do
so at http://www.houseoffusion.com/users/
Well played :)
--
~ Mike Stemle, Jr.
On Feb 28, 2012, at 18:59, Bryan Stevenson br...@electricedgesystems.com
wrote:
tabs inserted as 2 spaces ;-)
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 18:45 -0600, Michael Stemle wrote:
We are in disagreement. Some of us actually use comments as a way of
planning
Those using comments to plan code probably don't have any tests. Tests are
essential to allow re-factoring with confidence; comments don't provide
that benefit. This is not a religious belief, it's something that can be
demonstrated the first time you want to maintain a 1500 line file and all
In properly designed code you don't have 1500-line files. Now that I've made my
ridiculous assertion can we please move on?
This is just silly, and there is no actual reason behind your assertion, merely
an arrogant assertion that you know how everyone else's applications are
written, and
Maybe some of us _shouldn't_ be seen. ;)
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Brian Thornton br...@cfdeveloper.com wrote:
Back in the day (it was a tuesday i think) Mike and Judith had the
idea to let us HOF users upload a photo of our fugly mug selfs...
I thought this would be a reminder that
A section of the site that has not been touched in ages and has a
broken control or two. Looks like something to be fixed right after my
nested comments removal article.
Fun
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Brian Thornton br...@cfdeveloper.com wrote:
Back in the day (it was a tuesday i think)
And TDD is the easiest way to cover the re-factoring necessary to prevent
1500 line files from turning up. It's also the easiest way to come up with
the good designs that are equally as necessary.
Dev shops who've implemented TDD can and do easily measure the improvement
in code quality
I should also have added, tests *are* the documentation.
--
Shu Ha Ri: Agile and .NET blog
http://www.bifrost.com.au/
On 29 February 2012 09:48, Michael Stemle themanchic...@gmail.com wrote:
Tests are great, useful, and absolutely vital to modern development
practice... but they are a poor
You're a condescending troll, and I'm done here. Have a great day.
--
~ Mike Stemle, Jr.
On Feb 28, 2012, at 21:56, James Holmes james.hol...@gmail.com wrote:
And TDD is the easiest way to cover the re-factoring necessary to prevent
1500 line files from turning up. It's also the easiest
On 2/29/2012 9:37 AM, Raymond Camden wrote:
Maybe some of us _shouldn't_ be seen. ;)
you mean like these?
http://twitpic.com/2y6t25
http://twitpic.com/2y3f1d
-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2114/4840 - Release Date:
Well.. I'm up in the air about this.. After all, it's a job list and
it is CF jobs..
So.. it's useful.. kind of.. :)
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 5:59 PM, RobG snarfb...@yahoo.com wrote:
Yes. I've blocked him on Twitter because he's doing the same crap there too.
I'm about to setup an email
Rob-
There's nothing going on twitter. Jobs I don't bid on I pass along.
What are you talking about?
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 8:59 PM, RobG snarfb...@yahoo.com wrote:
Yes. I've blocked him on Twitter because he's doing the same crap there too.
I'm about to setup an email filter as well.
Rob- So we are clear there are 400+ unfilled CF jobs.
I'm not a recruiter and after taking from the community mostly for the
14 or so years I think passing along the good ones would help many
people looking for work.
But I say to you Rob, if you don't want jobs emails, why don't you drop off?
36 matches
Mail list logo
