RE: HTTP Post o a CFM page

That simple? Must be blind! Thanks -Original Message- From: Mike Townend [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 August, 2003 17:42 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: HTTP Post o a CFM page Have a look at GetHttpRequestData() HTH Mikey

RE: Internationalization Issue

You should use the following code: cfscriptSetEncoding(form,UTF-8);/cfscript You can use the same for URL's , simply replace form by url as the first argument. Dominique -Original Message- From: Richard Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 July, 2003 01:09 To: CF-Talk Subject:

SOT: CFCDEV List

Is CFCDEV list still alive? I didn't receive any posts for more than a week, although I made 2 posts myself. Thanks Dominique ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription:

RE: WDDX and UDF

: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW : www.camdenfamily.com/morpheus Yahoo IM : morpheus My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is. - Yoda -Original Message- From: D. Delcomminette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 9:38 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: WDDX and UDF

RE: WDDX and UDF

: www.camdenfamily.com/morpheus Yahoo IM : morpheus My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is. - Yoda -Original Message- From: D. Delcomminette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 11:32 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: WDDX and UDF Yeah, almost. Users

RE: WDDX and UDF

Hi, I am not really convinced about the explanation, the deserialized packet shows the function name, access hint, output and array of parameters .. I thought about the CFC solution but can't see exactly how to implement it ... Thanks anyway -Original Message- From: webguy

RE: WDDX and UDF

-Original Message- From: webguy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 6:10 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: WDDX and UDF * I am not really convinced about the explanation, Why not? * As Raymond says in a further message if I am able to serialize it without getting any

RE: WDDX and UDF

Ops . I wish my English was better . I do not want to store anything as a function, but I have to! Because some parameters amongst others are just the function the user chooses to places at some point . Can't find how to explain it in another way. Thanks for your

RE: WDDX and UDF

, and a powerful ally it is. - Yoda -Original Message- From: D. Delcomminette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 10:34 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: WDDX and UDF Ops . I wish my English was better . I do not want to store anything

RE: CF MX Query of Query Lower() Function

Hi Jochem, It is exactly what I meant, the Lower() causes the problem. In my case, it's not easy to add an intermediate QoQ since my QoQ is generated dynamically on a lot of criteria entered in a form by a user. I guess I'll have to use Oracle vues instead of QoQ in the mean time .. by the

RE: CF MX Query of Query Lower() Function

HI, Thanks for your answer. However for different reason it is not acceptable for me to use the Lower() in the original query. So I think in this case, I will replace the QoQ by an Oracle view, which will do the thing ... Dominique -Original Message- From: Tim Painter

RE: Server Side only

Not at all, should be new possibility in MX ?? -Original Message- From: Jeffry Houser [mailto:jeff;farcryfly.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 7:44 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Server Side only You are probably thinking about scheduled tasks, where a CFM page is run without being

RE: repost: CF MX Debug option screws up javascript

- From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:sean;corfield.org] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 6:53 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: repost: CF MX Debug option screws up javascript On Monday, Oct 21, 2002, at 02:31 US/Pacific, D. Delcomminette INGECOM wrote: I got it ! I am using cfsavecontent to generate parts

repost: CF MX Debug option screws up javascript

Posted this a couple of days but didn’t have any real answer. It is a real issue … any clues anybody ?? I have an application page in which a button opens a form with simple Javascript functions in a new browser window . Everything works fine in CF5 and even CFMX if I disable the debug output.

RE: MX Debug option screws up javascript ??

Must be a misunderstanding, this piece of code works fine for ages in CF5, with or without CF debug output. It also works fine with CFMX if I do not activate CF debug output, problem arise with CFMX and debug output activated. It is independent of the browser used ( IE or NS). Dominique

Dateformat behaviour

Have a strange behaviour of DateFormat() function. Look at the following code and the results below. In my opinion CF could give me an error message on the second line (invalid date) but certainly not invert the day and month as it does! Your comments? Dominique cfoutput TABLE border="1"