> You don't get money just from people clicking the Ads?
>
> Well that sucks. It's not your fault if they don't want to
> buy a product that they've seen.
>
> TV Stations are paid regardless of if someone actually calls
> the 1-800 number on the screen to order anything.
>
> Billboard spac
On Wednesday 05 Nov 2003 18:47 pm, Michael Dinowitz wrote:
> You probably had a number (50 or so) dashes, tildas or the like between the
> data sets. The list has been set for a long time to treat 50 or more of
> these elements in a row as the list footer and remove everything past it.
Why not
Oh.
Damn. 0_0
You don't get money just from people clicking the Ads?
Well that sucks. It's not your fault if they don't want to buy a product
that they've seen.
TV Stations are paid regardless of if someone actually calls the 1-800
number on the screen to order anything.
Billboard space
>Can we do a stats search ourself?
I'll have that build in tonight. Till then, you can use this to view the stats for CF-Talk for the last year:
http://houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/stats.cfm
>A drop of 10% from one month to the next may or may not be significant
>when taken in context of other mo
>Must have been due to the move to HTML? I know that Sean Corfield left,
>vocally on his blog but respectfully not on this list.
Nope. Due to the footer cleanup code. The text footer cleanup code actually. :)
>I have to use Lotus Notes R5 at work and it sucks - no "plain text" option
>and clunky a
>Not only did the list of contributors vanish, so did my comment that they
>had...
You probably had a number (50 or so) dashes, tildas or the like between the data sets. The list has been set for a long time to treat 50 or more of these elements in a row as the list footer and remove everythin
"some" revenue).
Eric
- Original Message -
From: Dan Phillips (CFXHosting.com)
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 8:54 AM
Subject: RE: [Stats] CF-Talk: October 2003
We have had this discussion over on CF-Community before. Some felt that
paying a very
At 7:54 AM -0400 11/5/03, Angel Stewart wrote:
A drop of 10% from one month to the next may or may not be significant
when taken in context of other months eh? ;-)
Agreed. Such fluctuation is completely normal and shouldn't be
misconstrued to signify any change in the level of participation or
s
Here's the post resent. In this post I've removed all instances of
lengthy successive underscore characters (more than those characters
used above and below the CF-Talk Stats report header) that were used
in the prior post to help visually divide sections of this report.
Hopefully this will com
ent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 1:27 PM
Subject: [Stats] CF-Talk: October 2003
> Searchable archives for this list are available at
>
>
> ---
> CF-Talk Stats
> October, 2003
> ---
>
> Note: Up/Down % as compared with September, 2003
>
&
What about everything else I said?
"I'd go.
Why pay for something I can get elsewhere for free ?"
Good...for a moment I was wondering if you didn't comprehend the reason
for using HTML in the emails.
-Gel
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wedne
ECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 4:48 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: [Stats] CF-Talk: October 2003
Not only did the list of contributors vanish, so did my comment that they
had...
--
Tom Chiverton
Advanced ColdFusion Programmer
Tel: +44(0)1749 834997
email: [EMAIL PROT
: [Stats] CF-Talk: October 2003
On Wednesday 05 Nov 2003 11:54 am, Angel Stewart wrote:
> I wonder how many people would disappear if we all had to pay a
> yearly/monthly subscription for these lists?
I'd go.
Why pay for something I can get elsewhere for free ?
--
Tom Chiverto
On Wednesday 05 Nov 2003 11:54 am, Angel Stewart wrote:
> I wonder how many people would disappear if we all had to pay a
> yearly/monthly subscription for these lists?
I'd go.
Why pay for something I can get elsewhere for free ?
--
Tom Chiverton
Advanced ColdFusion Programmer
Tel: +44(0)1749
Can we do a stats search ourself?
A drop of 10% from one month to the next may or may not be significant
when taken in context of other months eh? ;-)
July had a grand total of 977 posts according to a search on everything
done between 01 July and 31 July 2003.
In fact the list statistic
al Message-
From: Thomas Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 5 November 2003 8:48 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: [Stats] CF-Talk: October 2003
Not only did the list of contributors vanish, so did my comment that they
had...
--
Tom Chiverton
Advanced ColdFusion
Not only did the list of contributors vanish, so did my comment that they
had...
--
Tom Chiverton
Advanced ColdFusion Programmer
Tel: +44(0)1749 834997
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BlueFinger Limited
Underwood Business Park
Wookey Hole Road, WELLS. BA5 1AF
Tel: +44 (0)1749 834900
Fax: +44 (0)1749 8
On Tuesday 04 Nov 2003 18:27 pm, Bill Doerrfeld wrote:
> Top 20 Contributors by Number of Posts
>
>
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
Searchable archives for this list are available at
---
CF-Talk Stats
October, 2003
---
Note: Up/Down % as compared with September, 2003
Posts: 3724 (Down 10%)
Authors: 431 (Down 2%)
Threads: 805 (Up 8%)
Top 20 Contributors by Number of Posts
[Todays Th
19 matches
Mail list logo
