> Does anyone know if a template will timeout if called from
> the command line (eg as a sceduled task). I'm thinking that
> it will only timeout when called from the browser, and then
> only because the browser stops waiting. Can someone confirm
> or deny this?
Templates will timeout if they
CF should not handle too much text parsing.
Paul
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Lancelot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 06 December 2000 11:07
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Summary: A CF limitation in building a spider?
>
>
> depends on the settings in cf
sen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 11:43 PM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: RE: Summary: A CF limitation in building a spider?
>
>
>Does anyone know if a template will timeout if called from the
>command line (eg
>as a sceduled task). I'm thinking that it
To: CF-Talk
:> Subject: RE: Summary: A CF limitation in building a spider?
:>
:>
:> Does anyone know if a template will timeout if called from
:> the command line (eg
:> as a sceduled task). I'm thinking that it will only timeout
:> when called from the
:> browser, and th
Scheduled tasks in particular accept a timeout attribute; you can set them
individually.
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Heerssen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 3:43 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Summary: A CF limitation in building a spider?
Does anyone know
Does anyone know if a template will timeout if called from the command line (eg
as a sceduled task). I'm thinking that it will only timeout when called from the
browser, and then only because the browser stops waiting. Can someone confirm or
deny this?
Thanks
-- Bruce
> -Original Message---
Hi Everyone,
Here is a summary of responses to "A CF limitation in building a spider?"
that I posted a couple of weeks ago. I know a few folks had wanted to see
the results; maybe others will as well. Apologies to any I may have missed.
What will I do now? Use the existing CF spide
the known methods!!!
regards
Andrew Scott
Senior Cold Fusion Application Developer
ANZ eCommerce Centre
* Ph 9273 0693
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Michael Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 November 2000 17:11
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: A CF limitation in buildin
> Ive noticed one huge limitation that makes CF not a great
> choice in building a spider. CFHTTP doesnt like the use of
> URL pointers to another domain, like http://www.thisdomain.com
> redirects to http://www.thisotherdomain.com... In testing
> whether a domain is valid or not, an url point
James Sleeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: A CF limitation in building a spider?
>Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2000 18:06:21 +1300
>
>---Reply to mail from Phill Gibson about A CF limitation in building a
>spi
---Reply to mail from Phill Gibson about A CF limitation in building a spider?
> Does anyone know of a better way to do the recursive call to cfhttp? Anyway
> I see it, you are still calling one page, and it eventually times out.
Others have pointed out that CF is not a great tool for th
You're probably better off using something like Linkbot. Dump the results to
a db and use CF to create reports or whatever. This is also much more cost
effective. You won't be able to completely mimic Linkbot's features and yet
you'll spend many more man hours than an enterprise license would cost
> CF recursion, and the use of custom tags in general, doesn't
> perform as well
> as I'd like, due to each iteration of the script happening within
> a separate
> memory context, but the filesystem itself won't be a problem.
Roll on CF5, hopefully they're solving a lot of these problems... of ma
> There is no point in using up CF's resources on something
> it's not really designed for. Until we get custom functions
> (which we all hope will be in CF 5) then we can't really do
> recursion very easily. This is because calling a custom tag
> (even though it's 'cached' by the CF server)
t; Sent: 15 November 2000 08:40
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: A CF limitation in building a spider?
>
>
> I don't think that CF is the right tool for this task. In my eyes, this
> falls under the category of 'offline processing', meaning that you're not
&g
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 9:54 AM
To: CF-Talk
Cc: Phill Gibson (E-mail)
Subject: A CF limitation in building a spider?
Hi All,
I'm putting together a spider to be used with a search engine, and have come
up to what looks like a limitation in using CF for the task.
on 11/15/00 3:54 AM, Phill Gibson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm using cfhttp to extract links from specific sites. It loops through,
> collecting all hyperlinks that are within the site and adds them to a list
> to be visited. In visiting/indexing these links, however, it is still
> looping t
I built a FTP "recursive" custom tag that may help... although I have my
development server set to not time out I think that because it calls itself
over and over it may work for you?
http://cfhub.com/taggallery/ftp2tree/ftp2tree.zip
Hi All,
I'm putting together a spider to be used with a search engine, and have come
up to what looks like a limitation in using CF for the task. Here's what's
going on:
I'm using cfhttp to extract links from specific sites. It loops through,
collecting all hyperlinks that are within the site an
19 matches
Mail list logo
