RE: Access 97 and 2000

2000-08-23 Thread Olive, Christopher M Mr NMR
ris Olive, DOEHRS Website Administrator -Original Message- From: James Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 6:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Access 97 and 2000 I will have to try that again, I have had 4.3pro and 97 together, but never managed to ge

Re: Access 97 and 2000

2000-08-23 Thread James Smith
nt: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 4:47 PM Subject: RE: Access 97 and 2000 > that's actually incorrect. i am currently running both office versions. > (at one point, i had 4.3 on there, too!) > > the key with microsoft is to install their products in DATE ORDER, oldest > first. if yo

RE: Access 97 and 2000

2000-08-22 Thread Kathleen Ballard
- ::From: James Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ::Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 11:30 AM ::To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ::Subject: Re: Access 97 and 2000 :: :: ::oops, Microsoft strike again :-) :: ::As far as I know there is NO way to get both versions running on the same ::machine (thanks Microsoft

Re: Access 97 and 2000

2000-08-22 Thread Marc Garrett
istry and things work smoothly. Regards, Marc Garrett - Original Message - From: "Gene Kraybill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 2:32 PM Subject: RE: Access 97 and 2000 > I see Access 2000 has an option to save in Acce

RE: Access 97 and 2000

2000-08-22 Thread Olive, Christopher M Mr NMR
he 2000 install, they'll play together nicely. Chris Olive, DOEHRS Website Administrator -Original Message- From: James Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 11:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Access 97 and 2000 oops, Microsoft strike again :-) As far a

RE: Access 97 and 2000

2000-08-22 Thread Robert Everland
Everland III Web Developer Dixon Ticonderoga -Original Message- From: Andy Ewings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 10:52 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Access 97 and 2000 A miracle No really - I think you need to have them installed on

Re: Access 97 and 2000

2000-08-22 Thread James Smith
ated France he found it so perfect that to comfort those who couldn't live there, he created the French. - Original Message - From: "Gene Kraybill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 6:54 PM Subject: OT: Access 97 and 2000

RE: Access 97 and 2000

2000-08-22 Thread Gene Kraybill
u need to have them installed on a seperate drive, or > partition - but I'm not 100% sure > > -Original Message- > From: Gene Kraybill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 22 August 2000 18:55 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: OT: Access 97 and 2000 > >

Re: Access 97 and 2000

2000-08-22 Thread Deanna L. Schneider
H, I have both installed without a problem. I had 97 installed first, then installed 2000 from the disc and select the "install when first run" option. I can switch back and forth and even have both running at once. I have a Windows 98 OS, if that makes any difference. -Deanna ***

RE: Access 97 and 2000

2000-08-22 Thread Mark Armendariz
shed, start Access. -Original Message- From: Andy Ewings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 10:52 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Access 97 and 2000 A miracle No really - I think you need

RE: Access 97 and 2000

2000-08-22 Thread Andy Ewings
A miracle No really - I think you need to have them installed on a seperate drive, or partition - but I'm not 100% sure -Original Message- From: Gene Kraybill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 August 2000 18:55 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: Access 97 and 2000 What do

OT: Access 97 and 2000

2000-08-22 Thread Gene Kraybill
What does it take to run both Access 97 and Access 2000 on the same machine? We have some small CF db's in Access 97. We have a development machine with Office 2000 and tried to install only the Access portion of Office 97 on the same machine. When we try to start either version of Access, we