Part of the reason for Adobe Coldfusion 8 having features that the open
source competitors do not is commercial licensing. Adobe either owns the
license for some of the cool new tag features or paid the bucks to use a
third party license. The open source products may not have the money to pay
In the future, differences between projects are likely to be smaller
due to the creation of the CFML Advisory Committee.
http://corfield.org/blog/index.cfm/do/blog.entry/entry/CFML_Advisory_Committee
Hopefully it will delineate a core set of features/functions and
allow for more widely
Speaking of the advisory committee, I heard a rumor once (don't remember
where) that there was going to be a web site that would help the
community stay up on the progress of this committee. Any news on that so
far?
How about overall progress of the committee in general? What's the
committee been
I think they are slightly closer to having a wiki space up than OpenBD at
this point...how long has it been since we were promised a wiki with info on
OpenBD?
Adam Haskell
Also a member of the OpenBD Steering Committee :)
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Jordan Michaels [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Indeed. It's been a while now. ;)
Warm regards,
Jordan Michaels
Vivio Technologies
http://www.viviotech.net/
Open BlueDragon Steering Committee
Adobe Solution Provider
Adam Haskell wrote:
I think they are slightly closer to having a wiki space up than OpenBD at
this point...how long has it
Don L wrote:
Am thinking totally loud here, why not combine resources to come up with some
leading edge stuff, instead of being a follower (non-critical of neither
products, just a comment)?
Which resources do you want to combine exactly? What are you contributing?
Jochem
In the future, differences between projects are likely to be smaller
due to the creation of the CFML Advisory Committee.
http://corfield.org/blog/index.cfm/do/blog.
entry/entry/CFML_Advisory_Committee
Hopefully it will delineate a core set of features/functions and
allow for more widely
The comments on the blog posting I linked to confirms what you're
saying Larry but it also seems to show a willingness to involve people
from the OpenBD organization. Now whether or not that has happend, I
have no clue. I don't follow the CF politics too closely.There are
multiple members of the
In the future, differences between projects are likely to be smaller
due to the creation of the CFML Advisory Committee.
http://corfield.org/blog/index.cfm/do/blog.
entry/entry/CFML_Advisory_Committee
Hopefully it will delineate a core set of features/functions and
allow for more widely
Part of the reason for Adobe Coldfusion 8 having features that the open
source competitors do not is commercial licensing. Adobe either owns the
license for some of the cool new tag features or paid the bucks to use a
third party license. The open source products may not have the money to pay
Unfortunately you have a portion of the group (Sean and myself) having
been -very- swamped the last few weeks. We are all still around of
course, and still very much dedicated.
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Jordan Michaels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Indeed. It's been a while now. ;)
Warm
And another portion (myself) utterly buried under MAX prep. But, we'll get
there ...
--- Ben
-Original Message-
From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 5:06 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: CFML Advisory Committee (was: Alternative to coldfusion8
. But, we'll get
there ...
--- Ben
-Original Message-
From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 5:06 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: CFML Advisory Committee (was: Alternative to coldfusion8)
Unfortunately you have a portion of the group (Sean
Just ran a search for it and found two, of which one is well-known, that is,
BlueDragon, the other contender is Smith, did a quick browse of features
respectively, and noticed that some of 'hot-cake' CF8 features like cfajaxproxy
and associated tags are not supported by neither of them (on
You missed Railo in your search.
mxAjax / CFAjax docs and other useful articles:
http://www.bifrost.com.au/blog/
2008/10/24 Don L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just ran a search for it and found two, of which one is well-known, that
is, BlueDragon, the other contender is Smith, did a quick browse of
Add Railo to your search
http://railo-technologies.com/
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Don L [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just ran a search for it and found two, of which one is well-known, that
is, BlueDragon, the other contender is Smith, did a quick browse of
features respectively, and
BlueDragon comes in two flavors. The commercial version, which is
commercially supported, and Open BlueDragon, which is supported by the
community. Their URL's are as follows:
BlueDragon Commercial version (focusing on their .NET version)
http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/index.cfm
Add Railo to your search
http://railo-technologies.com/
Thanks for the heads-up and the URL, however, unlike BD, it does not list tag
comparison with cf8, hard to tell if it can support some of the great cf8
features listed in my last post.
BlueDragon comes in two flavors. The commercial version, which is
commercially supported, and Open BlueDragon, which is supported by the
community. Their URL's are as follows:
BlueDragon Commercial version (focusing on their .NET version)
http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/index.cfm
Umm...
http://www.railo-technologies.com/en/index.cfm?treeID=107
mxAjax / CFAjax docs and other useful articles:
http://www.bifrost.com.au/blog/
2008/10/24 Don L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Add Railo to your search
http://railo-technologies.com/
Thanks for the heads-up and the URL, however,
Umm...
http://www.railo-technologies.com/en/index.cfm?treeID=107
Thanks for the URL. It looks like an alternative could a road to he??
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get
21 matches
Mail list logo
