Re: AntiSpammy vs http://www.cflib.org/udf.cfm/safetext for preventing XSS

2011-05-20 Thread Pete Freitag
: RE: AntiSpammy vs http://www.cflib.org/udf.cfm/safetext for preventing XSS Anti Samy is brilliant, the way this is used is as a HTML string cleaner. What that means is that you define which configuration type you want, there are predefined configs like Slashdot to name but one. These configs

AntiSpammy vs http://www.cflib.org/udf.cfm/safetext for preventing XSS

2011-05-19 Thread Brook Davies
Hi Guys, I'm currently using the safeText UDF (http://www.cflib.org/udf.cfm/safetext) to clean user submitted content, both HTML fragments and full HTML documents. Based on some reading over at http://www.petefreitag.com/item/760.cfm , I am considering using AntiSammy instead. What I want

RE: AntiSpammy vs http://www.cflib.org/udf.cfm/safetext for preventing XSS

2011-05-19 Thread Andrew Scott
- From: Brook Davies [mailto:cft...@logiforms.com] Sent: Friday, 20 May 2011 1:09 AM To: cf-talk Subject: AntiSpammy vs http://www.cflib.org/udf.cfm/safetext for preventing XSS Hi Guys, I'm currently using the safeText UDF (http://www.cflib.org/udf.cfm/safetext) to clean user

RE: AntiSpammy vs http://www.cflib.org/udf.cfm/safetext for preventing XSS

2011-05-19 Thread Brook Davies
could use a regex to find it, strip it out, then run AntiSammy, then put the GA code back in... Brook -Original Message- From: Andrew Scott [mailto:andr...@andyscott.id.au] Sent: May-19-11 4:56 PM To: cf-talk Subject: RE: AntiSpammy vs http://www.cflib.org/udf.cfm/safetext for preventing XSS