: RE: AntiSpammy vs http://www.cflib.org/udf.cfm/safetext for
preventing XSS
Anti Samy is brilliant, the way this is used is as a HTML string cleaner.
What that means is that you define which configuration type you want, there
are predefined configs like Slashdot to name but one. These configs
Hi Guys,
I'm currently using the safeText UDF (http://www.cflib.org/udf.cfm/safetext)
to clean user submitted content, both HTML fragments and full HTML
documents. Based on some reading over at
http://www.petefreitag.com/item/760.cfm , I am considering using AntiSammy
instead. What I want
-
From: Brook Davies [mailto:cft...@logiforms.com]
Sent: Friday, 20 May 2011 1:09 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: AntiSpammy vs http://www.cflib.org/udf.cfm/safetext for
preventing XSS
Hi Guys,
I'm currently using the safeText UDF
(http://www.cflib.org/udf.cfm/safetext)
to clean user
could use a regex to find
it, strip it out, then run AntiSammy, then put the GA code back in...
Brook
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Scott [mailto:andr...@andyscott.id.au]
Sent: May-19-11 4:56 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: RE: AntiSpammy vs http://www.cflib.org/udf.cfm/safetext for
preventing XSS
4 matches
Mail list logo