. 3.2 will also see the Vivio installers become the official Railo
installers so folks who like simple click-click-done installers
This, the lack of simple installation, in my opinion is the biggest
impediment to attracting new people to the CF open source, if not many open
source
This, the lack of simple installation, in my opinion is the biggest
impediment to attracting new people to the CF open source,
Very good point.
Even if CF cannot be qualified as easy to install either.
~|
Order the Adobe
Railo, Open
Bluedragon, and Adobe Coldfusion? [Stackoverflow.com]
This, the lack of simple installation, in my opinion is the biggest
impediment to attracting new people to the CF open source,
Very good point.
Even if CF cannot be qualified as easy to install either
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 2:49 PM, UXB denn...@uxbinternet.com wrote:
. 3.2 will also see the Vivio installers become the official Railo
installers so folks who like simple click-click-done installers
This, the lack of simple installation, in my opinion is the biggest
impediment to attracting
It sounds like it's a first impression problem. Which is ironically what CF
has suffered from since day one. Many still scoff at CF based on a first
impression they got about it in the 90's or early 00's. Sadly people who
have tried it and been disappointed (be it CF, Railo or whatever
else)
-talk@houseoffusion.com
Subject: Re: What Notable Differences are there between Railo, Open
Bluedragon, and Adobe Coldfusion? [Stackoverflow.com]
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 22:10:19 -0500
From: mgr...@modus.bz
It sounds like it's a first impression problem. Which is ironically what CF
has
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4480205/what-notable-differences-are-there-between-railo-open-bluedragon-and-adobe-cold
Posting here to in hopes list readers will post new, useful answers.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion
you may also find this comparison helpful.
http://www.cfmldeveloper.com/page.cfm/coldfusion-vs-railo-1
Russ
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Matthew Lesko m.le...@verizon.net wrote:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4480205/what-notable-differences-are-there-between-railo-open-bluedragon
I tried to give a test to Railo some months ago.
The lack of documentation made me give up after a few days.
I finally upgraded to CF 9.
Documentation is the most important thing for developers.
For the same reason, I hate Mozilla.
It may be many times better than Explorer, but their
Wow, this is incredible. You hate open source and free stuff?
Really? I've used plenty of commercial software with crappy
documentation. Open source, or free, does not automatically equal
crappy documentation. And what kind of docs are you looking for in
your browser?
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010
Open source, or free, does not automatically equal crappy documentation.
At least for the two examples I gave, YES!
And what kind of docs are you looking for in your browser?
Mostly Javascript and CSS.
As far as HTML is concerned, there are not really differences.
you may also find this comparison helpful.
http://www.cfmldeveloper.com/page.cfm/coldfusion-vs-railo-1
Russ
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Matthew Lesko m.le...@verizon.net
wrote:
Thanks I've added this to an answer on the site. Comments are just as
interesting as the actual
I tried to give a test to Railo some months ago.
The lack of documentation made me give up after a few days.
I finally upgraded to CF 9.
Documentation is the most important thing for developers.
For the same reason, I hate Mozilla.
It may be many times better than Explorer, but their
December 2010 15:21
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: What Notable Differences are there between Railo, Open
Bluedragon, and Adobe Coldfusion? [Stackoverflow.com]
I tried to give a test to Railo some months ago.
The lack of documentation made me give up after a few days.
I finally upgraded to CF 9
When it comes to CFML programming the docs for Railo
is pretty much the same as ColdFusion.
Pretty much, until you find something that works under CF and does not under
Railo.
Most of the time, it is only a detail, but it can cost you hours.
The least would be some good docs about what's in
There are docs on the Railo site which details exactly what is and isn't
supported across the different platforms.
I use Railo, I find is a great alternative for most of my clients. - Then
again, we develop in multiple languages, so to me, it's just another
language to know the difference in
http://www.getrailo.org/index.cfm/documentation/compatibility/cfml-compatibility/
--
WSS4CF - WS-Security framework for CF
http://wss4cf.riaforge.org/
On 21 December 2010 01:20, wrote:
The least would be some good docs about what's in CF and is not in Railo, and
vice versa.
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:20 AM, wrote:
In Gmail, this post seems to be from an anonymous user...
I hate those open source or free stuff.
...so I visited the HoF site and I see it's Claude Schneegans, in
which case the negativity makes perfect sense.
The more undocumented free gadgets on
=E9egans schneeg...@interneti=71?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?ue.com=3E?=]
Sent: 20 December 2010 17:20
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: What Notable Differences are there between Railo, Open
Bluedragon, and Adobe Coldfusion? [Stackoverflow.com]
When it comes to CFML programming the docs for Railo
is pretty much
Thanks Magnus, I've just downloaded it.
Can anyone help with installing this through the Railo administrator, I am in
Archives Resources, cfx_tags etc and the only example is cfx_helloworld
with the class path railo.cfx.example.HelloWorld
and my aplogies to Gert Franz for mis spelling his
Still there
On Dec 6, 2008, at 6:23 AM, David McCan wrote:
BlueDragon has, I believe, an image manipulation tag (had it before
CF8). Was that removed from OBD?
--
Razuna On-Demand - Hosted Digital Asset Management Solution
Razuna - Open Source Digital Asset Management with Web Content
If I recall the latest Railo release added most of the functions that cf8
provide. OpenBD offers a cfimage tag, though we should put the image
functions on the road map. It may be important to note that Adobe did not
use open source libraries for much of ColdFusion's implementation for the
image
things running for BlueDragon JEE it is the same stuff for
OpenBD or Railo etc. Heck for local dev and tinkering Railo and OpenBD
both
come with a jetty bundle...download and click start. Easy as pie.
http://cfrant.blogspot.com/2008/03/jboss-eclipse-and-bluedragon.html
Adam
Well here is a tip to make any image manipulation product independent,
meaning you won't have to depend on Railo, OpenBD or AdobeCF to build
the tag you need and also have it work on all of those great CFML
engines:
Simply use cfexecute and use ImageMagick !
ImageMagick is simply the best
: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/railo_talk/
linked in: http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/71368/0CF7D323BBC1
David McCan schrieb:
Does anyone have experience or know if Open BlueDragon or Railo are suitable
for use in a high traffic e-commerce site? During the busiest times there
are about 100,000
://groups.yahoo.com/group/railo_talk/
linked in: http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/71368/0CF7D323BBC1
David McCan schrieb:
Does anyone have experience or know if Open BlueDragon or Railo are
suitable for use in a high traffic e-commerce site? During the busiest
times there are about 100,000 visitors between 8
:
Does anyone have experience or know if Open BlueDragon or Railo are
suitable for use in a high traffic e-commerce site? During the busiest
times there are about 100,000 visitors between 8 AM and 7 PM during a
day.
The highest concentration is between 10 AM and 2 PM. There are lots
I am chompin to try railo on my xserve but the one thing they don't really have
yet is decent install docs. I heard an installer for os x is coming they do
have some linux things but with all the dev'rs on macs these days it would be
nice to know how to install it right.
Its just a war. There really isn't much of an install. I wrote a blog entry
about getting things running for BlueDragon JEE it is the same stuff for
OpenBD or Railo etc. Heck for local dev and tinkering Railo and OpenBD both
come with a jetty bundle...download and click start. Easy as pie.
http
of an install. I wrote a blog
entry about getting things running for BlueDragon JEE it is the same stuff
for OpenBD or Railo etc. Heck for local dev and tinkering Railo and OpenBD
both come with a jetty bundle...download and click start. Easy as pie.
http://cfrant.blogspot.com/2008/03/jboss-eclipse
with wordpress and immediately
got sql injection (rock on php), so I had hms wipe the server and just install
reg leopard so I could have more control.
Its just a war. There really isn't much of an install. I wrote a blog entry
about getting things running for BlueDragon JEE it is the same
btw~ thanks for the link
I would like to keep it apache based so tomcat is probably my answer.
My thing is that I just want to try the options before cf9 comes out, I was
going to buy a cf8 license but since it's fairly close to the new one I am
waiting. But if one of these works then hey why
Gertz,
[quote]
and some image manipulations (cropping, etc)
[/quote]
what's available with Railo for image manipulation? I currently use cfx_imagecr3
(great tag by the way) but as you know that is not java based so is not
compatible any recommendations?
Andrew.
We do provide a Java ImageCR CFX solution to licensed customers.
This also provides 64-bit support and opens up some other options.
It is available for download after login, alongside the standard version.
There is no trial version yet.
--
Magnus
Gertz,
[quote]
and some image
Thank you for the feedback and suggestions. We are using Open BlueDragon for a
low traffic task tracker application. Since we had some experience with OBD it
was felt that was the one to try.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8
We have been using tmt_image.cfc for image cropping and CF8 image tag for
watermarking etc. I am guessing the tmt_image.cfc will work with either OBD or
Railo, but have not tried it.
BlueDragon has, I believe, an image manipulation tag (had it before CF8). Was
that removed from OBD?
David
Does anyone have experience or know if Open BlueDragon or Railo are suitable
for use in a high traffic e-commerce site? During the busiest times there are
about 100,000 visitors between 8 AM and 7 PM during a day. The highest
concentration is between 10 AM and 2 PM. There are lots
I am part of the OpenBD project so I will try to keep my opionions out of it
when it comes to OpenBD. They are both suitable for high traffic websites.
BlueDragon powers CarFax.com, as well as blog-city both of which are high
traffic. I am not sure what sites Railo runs but from my personal
I no longer see the free BlueDragon Server on New Atlanta's site. Did
Open BlueDragon basically replace it? Certainly seems like a different
beast.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release
I would assume it did but I am concerned about the later comment. I read it
with a negative connotation and I am curious how is it a different beast?
Adam
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Dan LeGate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I no longer see the free BlueDragon Server on New Atlanta's site
What you mean with Certainly seems like a different beast. ?
Kind Regards,
Nitai
On Nov 5, 2008, at 6:49 PM, Dan LeGate wrote:
I no longer see the free BlueDragon Server on New Atlanta's site. Did
Open BlueDragon basically replace it? Certainly seems like a
different
beast.
--
Razuna
In short, and unofficially, yes. NewAtlanta released their J2EE version
of BlueDragon as open-source (and released management of it back to the
initial developers of BD's core engine), then discontinued BD Free. It's
not a replacement per-se, but it can be used in a very similar way.
Without
the free BlueDragon Server on New Atlanta's site. Did
Open BlueDragon basically replace it? Certainly seems like a different
beast.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get
, 15 August 2008 2:08 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Free BlueDragon?
You really don't even have to do that.
True. The reason I mentioned XAMPP (Other than I love it) is that it comes
with Mysql built in. As well as all the batch scripts you need to start up
Tomcat, Mysql, Apache, FTP etc
Thanks
--
Senior Coldfusion Developer
Aegeon Pty. Ltd.
www.aegeon.com.au
Phone: +613 9015 8628
Mobile: 0404 998 273
-Original Message-
From: Gerald Guido [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 18 August 2008 2:23 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Free BlueDragon?
@ Andrew,
Have you got
Your points are well taken. My goal for this cf project is to implement an
idea with current technology but not necessarily up to last minute one, major
constraint is a very limited time/effort availability. Hence, I tried to nudge
Adobe and via this powerful cf group to make cf8 app server
JRun Webserver is a webserver. You are talking about the JRun
application server. The first is part of the second; JWS is only good
for serving web pages and has none of the functionality a production
webserver needs (like security, URL rewriting etc).
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Andrew
Mobile: 0404 998 273
-Original Message-
From: James Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 16 August 2008 4:06 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Free BlueDragon?
JRun Webserver is a webserver. You are talking about the JRun
application server. The first is part of the second; JWS
August 2008 4:06 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Free BlueDragon?
JRun Webserver is a webserver. You are talking about the JRun
application server. The first is part of the second; JWS is only good
for serving web pages and has none of the functionality a production
webserver needs (like security
On Thursday 14 Aug 2008, Dave Watts wrote:
Adobe/Macromedia gave this impression by stating this in several places.
Really ? I know they don't sell JRun anymore, but when they did they said it
was ace.
Also, the JRun web server has practically no functionality beyond serving
pages. Other
http://www.adobe.com/support/coldfusion/adv_development/config_builtin_webserver/index.html
Although you can use the ColdFusion MX built-in web server for
developing, testing, and debugging ColdFusion applications, Macromedia
does not recommend that you use it for deployment.
That's from 2002.
On Friday 15 Aug 2008, James Holmes wrote:
That's from 2002.
Yeah, I think 5 years of further development could, maybe, have improved
things I tad.
--
Tom Chiverton
This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP.
Halliwells LLP
They do still sell JRun ... they just aren't doing any more work to it
other than security fixes, platform support, etc.
£759+VAT :)
Andy
2008/8/15 Tom Chiverton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thursday 14 Aug 2008, Dave Watts wrote:
Adobe/Macromedia gave this impression by stating this in several
Mobile: 0404 998 273
-Original Message-
From: Don L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 14 August 2008 12:35 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Free BlueDragon?
Gerald Guido
I have a fair amount of experience with Open BD and Railo 3 beta using
Apache and Tomcat on Windows/Fedora/Centos
it as a plugin for openBD.
--
Senior Coldfusion Developer
Aegeon Pty. Ltd.
www.aegeon.com.au
Phone: +613 9015 8628
Mobile: 0404 998 273
-Original Message-
From: Barney Boisvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 14 August 2008 12:50 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Free BlueDragon?
OBD
-Talk
Subject: Re: Free BlueDragon?
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 8:49 PM, Barney Boisvert wrote:
OBD doesn't have any of the CF8 candy that you mention. It is
significantly lighter weight than CF though. From what you describe,
I think CF is your only option, as neither OBD or Railo (my open
source
PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 15 August 2008 2:08 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Free BlueDragon?
You really don't even have to do that.
True. The reason I mentioned XAMPP (Other than I love it) is that it comes
with Mysql built in. As well as all the batch scripts you need to start up
Tomcat, Mysql, Apache
: RE: Free BlueDragon?
I don't know why people have this impression but JRun is
quite able to run in production as the primary web server (as
opposed to using Apache as a front end).
Adobe/Macromedia gave this impression by stating this in several places.
Also, the JRun web server has
9015 8628
Mobile: 0404 998 273
-Original Message-
From: Andy Allan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 15 August 2008 11:08 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Free BlueDragon?
They do still sell JRun ... they just aren't doing any more work to it
other than security fixes, platform
On Thursday 14 Aug 2008, Don L wrote:
Thank you, Gerald, allow me to be lazy for a minute, cf8 comes with its own
web server albeit it is for development only,
I don't know why people have this impression but JRun is quite able to run in
production as the primary web server (as opposed to
f8 comes with its own web server albeit it is for development only, and
it can be installed siliently (without user interaction would probably be
more accurate)
If that is the case you could roll it up with something like XAMPP with the
Tomcat Plugin. With a bit of work and a bat file you can
in production. just grab
the Open BlueDragon war file, add your htm and cfm files to it and drop it into
the appropriate java application server deploy directory. In the next deploy
life cycle, the jas will pick up the change and start serving the files.
regards,
larry
Thank you, Gerald, allow me to be lazy for a minute, cf8
comes with its own web server albeit it is for development
only, and it can be installed siliently (without user
interaction would probably be more accurate), and this
capability (of silent installation + a default web server) is
I don't know why people have this impression but JRun is
quite able to run in production as the primary web server (as
opposed to using Apache as a front end).
Adobe/Macromedia gave this impression by stating this in several places.
Also, the JRun web server has practically no functionality
server that's robust enough to be used in production. just grab
the Open BlueDragon war file, add your htm and cfm files to it and drop it
into the appropriate java application server deploy directory. In the next
deploy life cycle, the jas will pick up the change and start serving the
files
A quick thank-you note, you guys are awesome! Thank you.
I've read a bit on this guy but still does not know anything
substantial about it, installing it and playing it out is an option
but if I could get some thoughts from someone has done that it would
be very desirable for my decision
I've read a bit on this guy but still does not know anything substantial about
it, installing it and playing it out is an option but if I could get some
thoughts from someone has done that it would be very desirable for my decision
on a small cf8-based app which uses a lot of new and sexy
I have a fair amount of experience with Open BD and Railo 3 beta using
Apache and Tomcat on Windows/Fedora/Centos. I would gladly answer any
questions. I would recommend posing your questions to the Open BD Google
Group @ http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
~G~
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at
Nitai @ SixSigns posted a video tute on setting up Open BD with apache
here: http://www.vimeo.com/1362803
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 6:12 PM, Don L [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've read a bit on this guy but still does not know anything substantial
about it, installing it and playing it out is
Gerald Guido
I have a fair amount of experience with Open BD and Railo 3 beta using
Apache and Tomcat on Windows/Fedora/Centos. I would gladly answer any
questions. I would recommend posing your questions to the Open BD Google
Group @ http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
~G~
Gerald
OBD doesn't have any of the CF8 candy that you mention. It is
significantly lighter weight than CF though. From what you describe,
I think CF is your only option, as neither OBD or Railo (my open
source CFML engine of choice) is going to fit the bill.
cheers,
barneyb
Barney Boisvert
Thank you, Gerald, allow me to be lazy for a minute, cf8
comes with its own web server albeit it is for development
only, and it can be installed siliently (without user
interaction would probably be more accurate), and this
capability (of silent installation + a default web server) is
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 8:49 PM, Barney Boisvert wrote:
OBD doesn't have any of the CF8 candy that you mention. It is
significantly lighter weight than CF though. From what you describe,
I think CF is your only option, as neither OBD or Railo (my open
source CFML engine of choice) is going
On Wednesday 16 Jul 2008, Will Tomlinson wrote:
Does anyone know where I can find the list of open blue dragon tags?
http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/8/htmldocs/help.html?content=Tags-pt0_01.html
:-)
--
Tom Chiverton
This email is
The best you find right now are the docs at New Atlanta:
http://www.newatlanta.com/support/bluedragon/docs/index.jsp
Does anyone know where I can find the list of open blue dragon tags?
Thanks,
Will
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8
Does anyone know where I can find the list of open blue dragon tags?
Thanks,
Will
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
On Sunday 11 May 2008, Gerald Guido wrote:
Greg,
Good deal. Could you provide any more info on the centos distro? A gig
sounds like it is a Desktop install. Is it one of the existing VM's form
VMWares Virtual Appliances Center or a custom install? Any admin tools on
it like webmin or is it a
2008/5/12 Tom Chiverton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I wouldn't expect anyone to use the OpenBD provided VM image in production,
so
I think the answers might be a bit moot.
People with smaller budgets - might well be tempted to use it for
internal apps, intranets, etc - so the smaller the footprint,
Hows that Tom? Its pretty common practice to ue VM to slice up say a windows
server. In fact I think that the image posted is SixSignal's image they plan
to use. Nital could clarify on that though.
Adam Haskell
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 4:40 AM, Tom Chiverton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sunday
Good news!
The following post went up about 1 hour ago:
VMWare Open BlueDragon image made available
http://blog.sixsigns.com/2008/05/11/vmware-open-bluedragon-image-made-
available/http://blog.sixsigns.com/2008/05/11/vmware-open-bluedragon-image-made-available/
See download link in page
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 3:23 PM, greg h [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good news!
The following post went up about 1 hour ago:
VMWare Open BlueDragon image made available
http://blog.sixsigns.com/2008/05/11/vmware-open-bluedragon-image-made-
available/http://blog.sixsigns.com/2008/05/11/vmware-open
BlueDragon image made available
http://blog.sixsigns.com/2008/05/11/vmware-open-bluedragon-image-made-
available/
http://blog.sixsigns.com/2008/05/11/vmware-open-bluedragon-image-made-available/
http://blog.sixsigns.com/2008/05/11/vmware-open-bluedragon-image-made-available/
See
on
it
like webmin or is it a pure command line interface?
Many TIA,
G
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 3:23 PM, greg h [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good news!
The following post went up about 1 hour ago:
VMWare Open BlueDragon image made available
http://blog.sixsigns.com
Just thought the list would like to know that Open BlueDragon, the open source
version of New Atlanta's BlueDragon for J2EE has been released.
http://www.openbluedragon.org/download.cfm
Versions include Open BlueDragon J2EE WAR Distribution and the Preconfiged
Jetty Instance (Ready2Run
Awesome. I heard the 3rd. I was looking for it this weekened. Wooo wooo, new
toy to play with. There goes this mornings productivity.
G
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Larry Lyons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just thought the list would like to know that Open BlueDragon, the open
source version
I need to talk to you. I'm having issues in my configuration where the first
mg application loads fine, and every subsequently loaded model glue application
attempts to load the first one's controller.cfc.
All the paths in the XML are double checked and correct. I'm out of ideas and
pulling
Off the top of my head, are the applications named differently?
Adam Haskell
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 7:30 PM, Jeff Gladnick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I need to talk to you. I'm having issues in my configuration where the
first mg application loads fine, and every subsequently loaded model
Thanks to Alan for giving me the go ahead to blog about this exciting
feature of Open BlueDragon.
http://cfrant.blogspot.com/2008/04/i-3-open-bluedragon.html
Adam Haskell
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most
I know there was quite a thread on here in weeks past talking about the buzz
of BlueDragon going open source. There is now a Discussion group for
questions and comments and potential contributers.
From the about: This is the official open source discussion list for the
Open BlueDragon project
Has anyone gone through the paces to make a BlueDragon AMI for Amazon EC2?
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk
=Build_a_scalable_architecture_with_Amazon%27s_EC2mode=entryentry=62ED0DB1-E1D7-BDC2-1BEC6F6C616658A4dv=link
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Eric Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone gone through the paces to make a BlueDragon AMI for Amazon EC2
/ext/s3fox.php
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Eric Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone gone through the paces to make a BlueDragon AMI for Amazon EC2?
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important
servers and give them support. I do a lot to promote BlueDragon to my users
when they are looking for alternatives, and am putting a lot of time right
now into testing on Railo and making that a good option for them as well.
I've not looked at Smith Project in a while, but can certainly look
support. I do a lot to promote BlueDragon to my
users
when they are looking for alternatives, and am putting a lot of time
right
now into testing on Railo and making that a good option for them as
well.
I've not looked at Smith Project in a while, but can certainly look at
that
in the future
fanboy especially
since he was running his site for a long time on BlueDragon!
only to have it come to light that NA implemented cfthread before Adobe, and
that it was up to Adobe to maintain compatibility.
Since Adobe (Macromedia / Allaire) created ColdFusion, I don't think
they have any
I would hardly describe Peter Farrell as an Adobe fanboy especially
since he was running his site for a long time on BlueDragon!
No, the person i was talking about is a certain Paul Vernon (NA's site is up,
just checked).
only to have it come to light that NA implemented cfthread before
See, that's exactly what i'm talking about. If another
company adds a feature *before* Adobe does, then how is it
not the responsibility of Adobe to maintain compatibility
when they themselves add the same feature? Should the other
company in question break backwards compatibility with
On Tuesday 11 Mar 2008, Tanguy Rademakers wrote:
atitude time and again in the CF community: when Adobe introduces new
syntax it's innovative, but when another vendor does it's disruptive. Last
Adobe 'own' CFML (the language). They can do what they like and still claim to
be 'compatable'.
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
See, that's exactly what i'm talking about. If another
company adds a feature *before* Adobe does, then how is it
not the responsibility of Adobe to maintain compatibility
when they themselves add the same feature? Should the other
company in
that
provides compatibility with someone else's product as its chief feature, the
onus is on you to provide that compatibility.
Nobody could argue that NA haven't made every reasonable effort to ensure
compatibility between BlueDragon and CFMX - as you point out, that's the
business they're in. But when
1 - 100 of 912 matches
Mail list logo
