Hello,
I have seen talk about using a different JVM than what was supplied
with CFMX. What I don't know is why? What are the benifits of using a
different JVM and what are the negatives?
I've always used the JVM which was supplied by Macromedia.
Thanks,
- Charles
Charles E. Heizer wrote:
Hello,
I have seen talk about using a different JVM than what was supplied
with CFMX. What I don't know is why? What are the benifits of using a
different JVM and what are the negatives?
I've always used the JVM which was supplied by Macromedia.
Thanks,
- Charles
When CFMX 6.0 first came out, there were a few JVMs that were faster,
and some that were more stable than the one that shipped with CF (if i
recall, it was 1.3.8 or 1.4.0). Since then, Sun has really pushed the
envelope and has really made the 1.4 branch really fast and stable on
their own JVM. I
Ok, So if I'm not using any Java code/applets then it probably does
not make much sense to update the JVM, right? I would like more
performance, but how would I measure the improvements?
Thanks,
- Charles
On Feb 1, 2006, at 9:56 AM, Jordan Michaels wrote:
Charles E. Heizer wrote:
Thanks! This makes sense.
I'll stick with what I have.
thanks again,
- Charles
On Feb 1, 2006, at 10:12 AM, Nathan Strutz wrote:
When CFMX 6.0 first came out, there were a few JVMs that were faster,
and some that were more stable than the one that shipped with CF (if i
recall, it was 1.3.8
5 matches
Mail list logo
