.
StoredProcName /
Non Mixed Case:
cfset storedProcVar = SCHEMANAME.PACKAGE_NAME.STORED_PROC_NAME /
And then used in:
cfstoredproc procedure=#storedProcVar#
datasource=#request.LOCAL_DATASOURCE#
Not sure if needing/not needing the () is just common sense or not, but I got
stuck on it for a bit
storedProc on another schema with this method, though it
requires nothing passed in. ie: this code approach works elsewhere
---
cfset storedProc = FUNDING. OMGItsMixedCase()
cfstoredproc procedure=#storedProc# dataSource=databasemonster
debug=yes returncode=yes
cfprocparam
= FUNDING. OMGItsMixedCase()
cfstoredproc procedure=#storedProc# dataSource=databasemonster
debug=yes returncode=yes
cfprocparam type=out cfsqltype=CF_SQL_VARCHAR dbvarname=datetext
/
/cfstoredproc
The error: (nemisis)
[Macromedia][Oracle JDBC Driver
. OMGItsMixedCase()
cfstoredproc procedure=#storedProc# dataSource=databasemonster debug=yes
returncode=yes
cfprocparam type=out cfsqltype=CF_SQL_VARCHAR dbvarname=datetext
/
/cfstoredproc
The error: (nemisis)
[Macromedia][Oracle JDBC Driver][Oracle]ORA
returncode=yes
What's with the param 1 in front of the call? then another
param 2??
A complete guess from a non-Oracle person, but ... could it be for the return
code?
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
returncode=yes
What's with the param 1 in front of the call? then another
param 2??
A complete guess from a non-Oracle person, but ... could it be for the return
code?
Ok, I've removed returncode and debug and now have the following.
cfstoredproc procedure=#storedProc# dataSource
I had incorrect information in my error in the previous two posts.
It should read:
The error: (nemisis)
[Macromedia][Oracle JDBC Driver][Oracle]ORA-00900: invalid SQL statement
The error occurred in D:\somepath\act_updateProgramFund.cfm: line 50
48 :
49 : cfstoredproc procedure
Hi,
I want to limit the total execution time of a stored procedure being called
from Coldfusion using cfstoredproc to 90 seconds. With cfquery there is a
parameter timeout, but there is no equivalent in cfstoredproc. Can anyone
think of an alternative to accomplishing this.
The trick
I want to limit the total execution time of a stored procedure being called
from Coldfusion using cfstoredproc to 90 seconds.
With cfquery there is a parameter timeout, but there is no equivalent in
cfstoredproc. Can anyone think of an alternative to
accomplishing this.
The trick is, I
@outputMessage = 'Here is a detailed and useful error
message'
RETURN 75 -- Your special code for this error
END
-- otherwise...
SET @outputMessage = 'Execution Successful'
RETURN 0
END
The cfstoredproc tag give you the return code, and you can then check
Three issues that come to mind:
You've really only listed two issues.
Cannot access transaction errors because a coldfusion exception is thrown so
any validation exceptions must be
handled through cftry/cfcatch instead of the CFSTOREDPROC. If en error occurs
in SQL, it means coldfusion
Three issues that come to mind:
Cannot access transaction errors because a coldfusion exception is thrown so
any validation exceptions must be handled through cftry/cfcatch instead of the
CFSTOREDPROC. If en error occurs in SQL, it means coldfusion throws an error
too.
dbvarname
listed two issues.
Cannot access transaction errors because a coldfusion exception is thrown so
any validation exceptions must be
handled through cftry/cfcatch instead of the CFSTOREDPROC. If en error
occurs in SQL, it means coldfusion throws
an error too.
This is (a) in keeping with how CF
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Tony Bentleyt...@tonybentley.com wrote:
dbvarname is completely useless. It would be nice to be able to send values
across out of order or not send a value if it is not needed (NULL). It would
also be nice to have those values in the debugging to reference.
Sorry, only two issues really.
A real world scenario is when a user tries to insert a value that must be
unique in the database. If a duplicate is found, SQL can return a reference
code and a message stating that there is a duplicate found, an exception is
thrown and an id is passed back -
'
RETURN 75 -- Your special code for this error
END
-- otherwise...
SET @outputMessage = 'Execution Successful'
RETURN 0
END
The cfstoredproc tag give you the return code, and you can then check it
for whatever problems may have occurred. You can then use
A real world scenario is when a user tries to insert a value that must be
unique in the database. If a duplicate
is found, SQL can return a reference code and a message stating that there is
a duplicate found, an exception
is thrown and an id is passed back - RAISERROR @@ERROR.
When
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Tony Bentleyt...@tonybentley.com wrote:
When this is thrown, the message states [Macromedia][SQLServer JDBC Driver]
and then the RAISERROR message following. Nice for debugging but not so nice
for passing the message and error code to a handler.
I would
Hi everybody, I have a problem with cfstoredproc and Informix database, when I
invoke a stored procedure by cfstoredproc, it returns me several columns with
the same name (EXPRESSION) and repeat the value of first column.
I am running CFMX 8.0.1 Enterprise, with Informix 9.40 and built
with cfstoredproc and Informix database, when
I invoke a stored procedure by cfstoredproc, it returns me several columns
with the same name (EXPRESSION) and repeat the value of first column.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most
) running CFSTOREDPROC?
For a CFSTOREDPROC vs CFQUERYPARAM debate what would be the better thans
on each side of the argument?
A few I can think of off the top of my head would be:
Stored Procedures - can contain advanced SQL procedural code. Encapsulate
code outside of you application
: cfqueryparam vs cfstoredproc?
Question... the more I read about CFQUERYPARAM the more it seems it
mitigates many of the problems that using stored procedures also solves. I
realize with stored procedures you have a lot more power in terms of SQL
scripting, but for basic queries, is CFQUERYPARAM just as fast
CFQUERYPARAM the more it seems it
mitigates many of the problems that using stored procedures also solves. I
realize with stored procedures you have a lot more power in terms of SQL
scripting, but for basic queries, is CFQUERYPARAM just as fast as (or
faster
than) running CFSTOREDPROC
The only issue I have run into with CFQUERYPARAM is that is can degrade
performance on dynamic queries.
This is an inherent issue in what CFQUERYPARAM does, it essentially makes
your queries into stored procs, if you actually watch the traffic flow
through a MS SQL Server for example, you will see
Marie,
In my experience with SQL Server there is zero notable performance difference
between well-formed SQL in a stored proc and the same well-formed SQL in a
CFQUERY with CFQUERYPARAM: both gain from the built-in performance tuning of
the data server. Also, note that you can run nearly any
Original Message
Subject: cfqueryparam vs cfstoredproc?
From: Marie Taylore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I realize with stored procedures you have a lot more power in terms of SQL
scripting,
This is not really true. You can put anything you want in a cfquery
block. temp tables, CTE's
Let's hope you don't ever need to handle more than one result set. :)
Also, that requires you get the return code manually as well.
~Brad
Original Message
Subject: Re: cfqueryparam vs cfstoredproc?
From: morgan l [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We call stored procedures using
Alan,
SQL Server will create an execution plan for each query that gets run, where
the plan is specific to the final Query definition. From SQL Server's
perspective, these are 2 different queries, so each gets its own plan:
Query with both names:
SELECT ID, FName, LName, Email
FROM SomeTable
Interesting...
I thought the same thing until I ran these tests. I analyzed the results
with ColdFusion debugging output, the Server Monitor in CF8 Ent, SeeFusion,
and watched them execute through SQL Profiler, all of them showed better
execution times when I removed the CFQUERYPARAMs. Now, this
Interesting, indeed. Wonder if there's an issue of table scan vs index and how
the initial execution plans are getting cached. Definitely something to keep
your eye on!
Interesting...
I thought the same thing until I ran these tests. I analyzed the results
with ColdFusion debugging output,
www.coldfusionmuse.com
www.necfug.com
-Original Message-
From: Alan Rother [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 11:28 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: cfqueryparam vs cfstoredproc?
Interesting...
I thought the same thing until I ran these tests. I analyzed the results
My 2 cents
I use ORACLE stored procs exclusively (using a CFSTOREDPROC tag) and have
found them to be great. There are things I can do in stored procs that
would be difficult to do in a CFC. I can easily have multiple datasets
returned in one call. And the CFPROCPARAM gives me the same
:45
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: cfqueryparam vs cfstoredproc?
My 2 cents
I use ORACLE stored procs exclusively (using a CFSTOREDPROC tag) and have
found them to be great. There are things I can do in stored procs that
would be difficult to do in a CFC. I can easily have multiple datasets
steps to paramaterize it. (requires
sp_executesql)
FYI: My advice assumes MS SQL.
~Brad
Original Message
Subject: RE: cfqueryparam vs cfstoredproc?
From: Adrian Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, October 30, 2008 1:06 pm
To: cf-talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
An open question
/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 October 2008 18:28
To: cf-talk
Subject: RE: cfqueryparam vs cfstoredproc?
exec()
or sp_executesql
You would need to pass in the arguments as a list to the procedure and
then do the looping and building of a dynamic query with SQL
:
http://adrianlynch.co.uk/post.cfm?postID=21
Adrian
Building a database of ColdFusion errors at http://cferror.org/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 October 2008 18:28
To: cf-talk
Subject: RE: cfqueryparam vs cfstoredproc?
exec()
or sp_executesql
You would need
PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 October 2008 18:28
To: cf-talk
Subject: RE: cfqueryparam vs cfstoredproc?
exec()
or sp_executesql
You would need to pass in the arguments as a list to the procedure and
then do the looping and building of a dynamic query with SQL. Then
execute what you have created.
Good
vs cfstoredproc?
I do you feel it would defeat the point?
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Adrian Lynch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Exactly, which kinda defeats the point I feel.
I've got a few ways that I might try but for now I'm back to writing SPs.
If anyone's interested, I have the full
against injection.
Adrian
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Rouse
Sent: 30 October 2008 19:52
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: cfqueryparam vs cfstoredproc?
I do you feel it would defeat the point?
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Adrian Lynch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Exactly, which
):
**
cffile action=Read
file=C:\testing\Test.xml
variable=variables.myXMLInput
cfstoredproc procedure=TESTCLOB datasource=MYDNS
cfprocparam cfsqltype=CF_SQL_CLOB type=In
value=#variables.myXMLInput#
cfprocparam cfsqltype=CF_SQL_CLOB type=Out
variable
Actually, I'm gonna pick on you again Dave and challenge
this. (I'm hoping to add to my wall)
If a someone is using MySQL ...
Well, the original poster was asking about the current attack, which
specifically targets MS SQL Server.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
Do you mind if I blog about that part where you said Yeah,
your right about that That's got to be good for my
cf_streetCred (ha).
I don't mind, no.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized
instruction
Excellent points! Thanks Dave, and everyone who took the time to reply to /
read this thread.
Moral lessons learned:
1) Don't go crazy with tightening security around SQL statements. Only
secure the vulnerable;
2) Whenever possible, think of using native CF functions to simplify code.
:-)
BTW,
Actually, I'm gonna pick on you again Dave and challenge
this. (I'm hoping to add to my wall)
If a someone is using MySQL ...
Well, the original poster was asking about the current attack, which
specifically targets MS SQL Server.
That might be true, but he didn't say that. He simply
that with CFStoredProc?
If I understand correctly, if you want to protect calls to stored procs
(from SQL injection and the like), you have to use cfstoredproc and
cfprocparam instead of cfquery and cfqueryparam. But apparently, you can't
indicate what parameters you're actually passing. Am I missing something?
Say
with CFStoredProc
Hello folks:
The discussion yesterday regarding using CFqueryparam to protect sites from
SQL Injection attacks got me thinking. Well, it is easy enough to use
CFQUERYPARAM everywhere inside CFQUERY tags, wherever a variable is passed
to the SQL query.
However, how do you do
Yup, you're making sense. The way around it is to pass NULL in using:
cfprocparam null=true
Adrian
-Original Message-
From: Qing Xia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 July 2008 15:21
To: CF-Talk
Subject: writing protected CF with CFStoredProc
Hello folks:
The discussion yesterday
What's wrong with using:
cfquery ...
exec sps_testproc
cfif whichvar = A
@aid=cfqueryparam value=123 cfsqltype=cf_sql_integer
cfelse
@bid=cfqueryparam value=456 cfsqltype=cf_sql_integer
/cfif
/cfquery
Adrian
-Original Message-
From: Qing Xia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 July 2008 15:21
To: CF-Talk
Subject: writing protected CF with CFStoredProc
Hello folks:
The discussion yesterday regarding using CFqueryparam to protect sites from
SQL Injection attacks got me thinking
True! I can certainly do this as well.
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 10:40 AM, morgan l [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's wrong with using:
cfquery ...
exec sps_testproc
cfif whichvar = A
@aid=cfqueryparam value=123 cfsqltype=cf_sql_integer
cfelse
In your example you are altering the behavior of the query based upon input
which does not affect injection attacks. The idea of protecting against
injection attacks is to stop invalid values from being executed within the
query/SP.
Take for example this query:
delete from customer where
i have been asked to look at a possible sql injection attack. as I look
through the code I see stored procs being called by using cfquery like:
cfquery name=asdf datasource=asdf
storedproc '#var1#', '#var2#'
cfquery
I've read about using cfstored procs and params to prevent
: cfquery and cfstoredproc
i have been asked to look at a possible sql injection attack. as I look
through the code I see stored procs being called by using cfquery like:
cfquery name=asdf datasource=asdf
storedproc '#var1#', '#var2#'
cfquery
I've read about using cfstored procs
PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: cfquery and cfstoredproc
i have been asked to look at a possible sql injection attack. as I look
through the code I see stored procs being called by using cfquery like:
cfquery name=asdf datasource=asdf
storedproc '#var1#', '#var2#'
cfquery
I've read
(Depending
on the version of CF, cfqueryparam disables cachedwithin caching.
This is true, but it doesn't prevent you from baking your own caching
mechanism as many have done.
In
all versions of CF, cfqueryparam effectively makes Sql Profiling with
SQL Server useless and there is no
]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 3:46 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: cfquery and cfstoredproc
(Depending
on the version of CF, cfqueryparam disables cachedwithin caching.
This is true, but it doesn't prevent you from baking your own caching
mechanism as many have done.
In
all versions of CF
Subject: Re: cfquery and cfstoredproc
In all versions of CF, cfqueryparam effectively makes Sql Profiling with
SQL Server useless and there is no workaround.
Please explain what you mean. Are you saying you can't run a trace and see
your SQL running. That is certainly not true. It may complicate
ticks are insufficient, so now I
know.)
Thanks for the info.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Brad Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 4:46 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: cfquery and cfstoredproc
(Depending
on the version of CF, cfqueryparam disables
Thanks Adrian. That's cool. however, it is not useful DURING the execution
of the SQL though correct?
~Brad
- Original Message -
From: Adrian Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 3:51 PM
Subject: RE: cfquery and cfstoredproc
-
From: Gaulin, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 4:34 PM
Subject: RE: cfquery and cfstoredproc
Hi Brad
Thanks for the links, those are interesting articles.
~|
Adobe
i have been asked to look at a possible sql injection attack.
as I look through the code I see stored procs being called
by using cfquery like:
cfquery name=asdf datasource=asdf
storedproc '#var1#', '#var2#'
cfquery
I've read about using cfstored procs and params
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 5:50 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: cfquery and cfstoredproc
i have been asked to look at a possible sql injection attack.
as I look through the code I see stored procs being called by using
cfquery like:
cfquery name=asdf datasource
What about a semi-colon?
Storedproc '#var1#','#var2#' ; *other code*
Would the CFQUERY not allow this additional code to run?
It wouldn't allow any of the values after the stored procedure call
storedproc to run as code, because they would be placed in the input
parameters of the stored
Subject: RE: cfquery and cfstoredproc
Dave,
What about a semi-colon?
Storedproc '#var1#','#var2#' ; *other code*
Would the CFQUERY not allow this additional code to run?
-Mark
Mark A. Kruger, CFG, MCSE
(402) 408-3733 ext 105
www.cfwebtools.com
www.coldfusionmuse.com
www.necfug.com
So I'm hearing that it should be fine??
Somehow their database columns values were appended the
following string
: /titleInvalidTag src=http://1.verynx.cn/w.js;/script!--
So for example the column firstname value was John became:
John/titleInvalidTag
The discussion yesterday regarding using CFqueryparam to
protect sites from SQL Injection attacks got me thinking.
Well, it is easy enough to use CFQUERYPARAM everywhere inside
CFQUERY tags, wherever a variable is passed to the SQL query.
However, how do you do that with CFStoredProc
www.necfug.com
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 6:07 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: cfquery and cfstoredproc
What about a semi-colon?
Storedproc '#var1#','#var2#' ; *other code*
Would the CFQUERY not allow this additional code to run
I never disagree with you (usually a fools errand)
Ha! I wish.
but I want a clarification. I think you might mean that this
particular use is safe because CF will escape the single quotes.
But the code below is vulnerable in exactly the same as a CFQUERY.
As a test I created an SP
Say you had a proc that looked like this:
CREATE PROC sps_testproc
@AID int = null,
@BID int = null
as
IF @AID is not null
SELECT @AID
IF @AID is not NULL
SELECT @BID
If I was using CFQUERY, unprotected-style, I might write this:
cfquery ...
So I'm hearing that it should be fine??
Somehow their database columns values were appended the following
string
: /titleInvalidTag src=http://1.verynx.cn/w.js;/script!--
So for example the column firstname value was John became:
John/titleInvalidTag
and cfstoredproc
I never disagree with you (usually a fools errand)
Ha! I wish.
but I want a clarification. I think you might mean that this
particular use is safe because CF will escape the single quotes.
But the code below is vulnerable in exactly the same as a CFQUERY.
As a test I created
, 2008 8:58 PM
Subject: RE: cfquery and cfstoredproc
Dave,
Do you mind if I blog about that part where you said Yeah, your right
about
that That's got to be good for my cf_streetCred (ha).
-mk
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion
As Mark pointed out, if you did have numeric inputs in your CFQUERY tag,
those would still be vulnerable. If not, though, the rest of my statement
still stands.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
Actually, I'm gonna pick on you again Dave and challenge this. (I'm
This should have been simple as making a PBJ.
I am calling a SP (SQL Server 2005) using the
CFStoredProc function and to get the result set returned as nextval.
Basically it should return an interget value
I am calling a SP (SQL Server 2005) using the
CFStoredProc function and to get the result
set returned as nextval. Basically it should
return an interget value.
...
What is it I am missing?
Without seeing the SP code, who can say? My guess is that your SP is
returning an output
It looks like you are missing the DBVAR name.
cfstoredproc datasource=#application.datasource#
procedure=usp_select_nextval
cfprocparam type=In cfsqltype=CF_SQL_VARCHAR value=DataTrack_Block
dbvarname=insertfieldnamehere
cfprocresult name = nextval
/cfstoredproc
CF Developer wrote
.
I am calling a SP (SQL Server 2005) using the
CFStoredProc function and to get the result set returned as nextval.
Basically it should return an interget value.
cfstoredproc
datasource=#application.datasource# procedure=usp_select_nextval
, November 09, 2007 8:24 AM
To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Subject: Re: CFStoredProc
It looks like you are missing the DBVAR name.
CF Developer wrote:
This should have been simple as making a PBJ.
I am calling a SP (SQL Server 2005) using the CFStoredProc function and to
get the result
cfstoredproc.statuscode
-Original Message-
From: CF Developer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 10:40 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFStoredProc
The storedProc only returns a single interget value not
a database object or field.
It runs a Query
If you arent returning a result set then you should use a procparam with
type=out.
--
Gary Gilbert
http://www.garyrgilbert.com/blog
~|
ColdFusion is delivering applications solutions at at top companies
around the world in
You are right. I misread your issue. Since you are only wanting an
output variable, you need to change the type to OUT and use the
Variable attribute.
cfprocparam cfsqltype=CF_SQL_INTEGER variable=nextval type=OUT
CF Developer wrote:
The storedProc only returns a single
Hi, i have the following code to call a stored procedure which is stored in
mysql.
cfstoredproc procedure=addOneToOneChildFolder datasource=portdb
cfprocparam type=in cfsqltype=cf_sql_varchar
value=#url.OneToOneFolder# null=no
cfprocparam type=in cfsqltype=cf_sql_bigint value=1 null
Hi Eric, thanks for your reply
I did what you said but it is saying that queryResult is undefined
the code i used was
cfstoredproc procedure=addOneToOneChildFolder datasource=portexdb
cfprocparam type=in cfsqltype=cf_sql_varchar value=Hello null=no
cfprocparam type=in cfsqltype
CF returns the value of the OUT variable as a regular variable, just
like you created it with cfset for example.
Try this:
cfstoredproc procedure=addOneToOneChildFolder datasource=portdb
cfprocparam type=in cfsqltype=cf_sql_varchar
value=#url.OneToOneFolder# null=no
cfprocparam type
Hi, i have the following code to call a stored procedure
which is stored in mysql.
cfstoredproc procedure=addOneToOneChildFolder datasource=portdb
cfprocparam type=in cfsqltype=cf_sql_varchar
value=#url.OneToOneFolder# null=no
cfprocparam type=in cfsqltype=cf_sql_bigint value=1
Thanks Dave your a superstar!!!
I changed the value to variable and it worked fine :)
Thanks again
~|
Check out the new features and enhancements in the
latest product release - download the What's New PDF now
within this
communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions.
Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com
-Original Message-
From: Richard Meredith-Hardy
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Wed Feb 28 04:58:19 2007
Subject: RE: Cfstoredproc message
I suppose it's really a mssql question
procedure that uses xp_cmdshell and sqlcmd/osql (sql
2005/2000) to
capture the messages and return them to cfstoredproc
Then parse the output messages
Janet
~|
ColdFusion MX7 and Flex 2
Build sales marketing dashboard RIAâs
: Cfstoredproc message
Well if it is success or not then you just use the return
codes. If you want a specific user defined message you will
have to select it into a var and return it as an OUT or as a
resultset.
This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Gateway House, 28 The
Quadrant, Richmond
If you use java DB stuff, I assume it would be available...
Probably not from the built in CF DB stuff tho. :-/
On 2/27/07, Richard Meredith-Hardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not quite what I'm looking for, I think.
This is actually a sp which contains a RESTORE DATABASE command and I'm
I suppose it's really a mssql question of trapping the generated message(s)
and putting them in a var which can be returned to CF.
How to do it though?
-Original Message-
From: Dinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 February 2007 00:38
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Cfstoredproc
Simple question, I hope
How does one get back to CF the message a stored proc normally puts in the
messages window when you run it in SQL Server management studio or enterprise
manager?
Thanks in advance
Richard
(I've hunted around but difficult to search for the word 'message'...)
are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions.
Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com
-Original Message-
From: Richard Meredith-Hardy
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Tue Feb 27 06:45:39 2007
Subject: Cfstoredproc message
Simple question, I hope
How does one get back to CF the message a stored proc
Feb 24 22:46:09 2007
Subject: RE: cfstoredproc vs cfquery
Thanks for your input, Dave. My concern is the processing
overhead that is incurred by using CFSTOREDPROC. Do you know
of any way to access multiple recordsets in CFQUERY? As it
stands now, CFQUERY only returns the 1st recordset while
Thanks for your input, Dave. My concern is the processing
overhead that is incurred by using CFSTOREDPROC. Do you know
of any way to access multiple recordsets in CFQUERY? As it
stands now, CFQUERY only returns the 1st recordset while
ignoring the rest. The ability to pull multiple
Thanks for your input, Dave. My concern is the processing overhead that is
incurred by using CFSTOREDPROC. Do you know of any way to access multiple
recordsets in CFQUERY? As it stands now, CFQUERY only returns the 1st recordset
while ignoring the rest. The ability to pull multiple recordsets
# /
Or
cfstoredproc datasource=mydatasource procedure=GetAllResults
cfprocresult name=myquery /
/cfstoredproc
cfdump var=#myQuery# /
CFquery seems to be faster to me. I just wondered what everyone else thought
about it and if there was an advantage or disadvantage either way that I
dont know about.
Oh, I
The only one I can think of, but then I don't use SP's very often; IIRC is that
the cfstoredProc tag can handle more complex procedures.
--
Ian Skinner
Web Programmer
BloodSource
www.BloodSource.org
Sacramento, CA
-
| 1 | |
- Binary Sudoku
None come to mind that can't be executed via cfquery. What do you mean by
more complex?
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.18.3/697 - Release Date: 2/22/2007
11:55 AM
cfstoredproc will allow you to get back multiple resultsets. If
you've got the latest updates (and the release notes are correct),
they've finally fixed the 'annoymous' resultset issue, allowing
un-numbered cfprocresults.
-Original Message-
From: Bobby Hartsfield [mailto:[EMAIL
1 - 100 of 424 matches
Mail list logo
