Re: Coldfusion CFMX 6.1 on Red Hat

2006-01-20 Thread Thomas Chiverton
On Wednesday 18 January 2006 13:59, Protoculture wrote: I am wondering, an isp that we deal with is telling us that the latest version of Red Hat will only work with CF 7. something about updates and stuff and they are saying that it(CFMX) wont work with apache etc... the updates to red hat

Coldfusion CFMX 6.1 on Red Hat

2006-01-18 Thread Protoculture
Hi List, I am wondering, an isp that we deal with is telling us that the latest version of Red Hat will only work with CF 7. something about updates and stuff and they are saying that it(CFMX) wont work with apache etc... the updates to red hat will not work with CFMX 6.1. I'm not convinced.

Re: Coldfusion CFMX 6.1 on Red Hat

2006-01-18 Thread Cutter (CF-Talk)
There was something in the CFPodcasts about this (can't remember which, but I know it was somewhere between 1 and three). Apparently there was a new Security Engine layer built into the latest version of RedHat as part of an initiative from NSA to create a more secure computing environment.

Re: Coldfusion CFMX 6.1 on Red Hat

2006-01-18 Thread Dave Carabetta
On 1/18/06, Cutter (CF-Talk) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There was something in the CFPodcasts about this (can't remember which, but I know it was somewhere between 1 and three). Apparently there was a new Security Engine layer built into the latest version of RedHat as part of an initiative from

Re: Coldfusion CFMX 6.1 on Red Hat

2006-01-18 Thread Steven Erat
Can you provide more information? The system requirements for CFMX 6.1 with regard to Red Hat Linux state support for RH 7.2, 7.3, 8, 9, RHEL 2.1 and RHEL 3, whereas the System Requirements for CFMX 7.01 state support for RHEL 3 and 4. System Reqs CFMX 6.1

Re: Coldfusion CFMX 6.1 on Red Hat

2006-01-18 Thread Steven Erat
Oh, and about Apache, neither ColdFusion nor JRun support Apache 2.2 at this time. There is a bug logged on it, and It is expected that a future update to the connector will resolve this. On 1/18/06, Steven Erat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can you provide more information? The system