Re: Dreamweaver Ultradev 4 - any good?

2000-11-17 Thread Greg Wolfinger
to be sent to my work by Macromedia. Anyone else get it yet Greg - Original Message - From: Jon Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 1:20 PM Subject: Re: Dreamweaver Ultradev 4 - any good? Ok, is everyone here special?I haven't seen anything

Re: Dreamweaver Ultradev 4 - any good?

2000-11-16 Thread Greg Wolfinger
. S. Greg - Original Message - From: Tom Muck [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 2:29 PM Subject: Re: Dreamweaver Ultradev 4 - any good? UD4 is awesome. The Server Behavior builder will let you fill in your own code snippets with your

Re: Dreamweaver Ultradev 4 - any good?

2000-11-16 Thread Robert Sarno
He has already. Same thing as Dreamweaver just supports color coding with ASP, JSP, and CF. I prefer CF studio. Rob From: "Stephen M. Aylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Dreamweaver Ultradev 4 - any good? Date: Wed, 15 N

RE: Dreamweaver Ultradev 4 - any good?

2000-11-16 Thread Paul Ihrig
whats the who table? -paul -Original Message- From: Greg Wolfinger [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 10:06 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Dreamweaver Ultradev 4 - any good? Dreamweaver is great for our graphic design department that doesn't

Re: Dreamweaver Ultradev 4 - any good?

2000-11-16 Thread Jon Hall
000 10:05 PM Subject: Re: Dreamweaver Ultradev 4 - any good? Dreamweaver is great for our graphic design department that doesn't ColdFusion and (even though they say they do) HTML too. For me, a web developer I find that it slows me down. They did improve the who table support quite a bit

RE: Dreamweaver Ultradev 4 - any good?

2000-11-16 Thread Paul Mone
er 15, 2000 10:05 PM Subject: Re: Dreamweaver Ultradev 4 - any good? Dreamweaver is great for our graphic design department that doesn't ColdFusion and (even though they say they do) HTML too. For me, a web developer I find that it slows me down. They did improve the who table support

Re: Dreamweaver Ultradev 4 - any good?

2000-11-16 Thread Tom Muck
Ok, is everyone here special?I haven't seen anything about UD4 except for Macromedia's page, which says coming soon. Anyone have a link? jon It was announced at the Dreamweaver conference on Monday. Several of us are on the UltraDev beta, which is why we know about the features. The

RE: Dreamweaver Ultradev 4 - any good?

2000-11-15 Thread Paul Ihrig
] 614 449-1681 [EMAIL PROTECTED] icq:47658358 -Original Message- From: Michael Kear [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 1:04 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Dreamweaver Ultradev 4 - any good? Has anyone tried the new Dreamweaver Ultradev 4? I

RE: Dreamweaver Ultradev 4 - any good?

2000-11-15 Thread Shawn Regan
tent-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN" HTML HEAD META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1" META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version = 5.5.2650.12&quo

Re: Dreamweaver Ultradev 4 - any good?

2000-11-15 Thread Tom Muck
basic database-driven pages up there quickly. UD1 was a little limiting for CF, but UD4 is great. tom - Original Message - From: "Shawn Regan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "CF-Talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 11:38 AM Subject: RE: Dreamweaver U

Re: Dreamweaver Ultradev 4 - any good?

2000-11-15 Thread Stephen M. Aylor
I think I'll wait till after ivanopolo reviews it :-) kidding... Steve Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe:

Dreamweaver Ultradev 4 - any good?

2000-11-14 Thread Michael Kear
Has anyone tried the new Dreamweaver Ultradev 4? I thought version 3 (the first) was ok, and a good start but was only for the most simple database operations. Challenge the SQL at all and it wasn't up to the task. No doubt Macromedia have worked on that aspect, and I'd like to know if it's