On Tuesday 23 Mar 2010, b...@bradwood.com wrote:
> As a ColdBox user, that would be really really nice for the IDE to be
> aware of how the autowiring is going to work at run time. I never
> realized how useful it was for your IDE to "know" about the variables
> and objects in your code until I d
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Adrocknaphobia wrote:
...
> I already shared you feedback with the CB engineering team _and_ Luis. I'm
> very much on board with providing extension points into our parsers. :-)
Sweet! Stuff like this is more along the lines I was referring to. :)
And y'all don
Thanks Adam. I send Luis fan mail all the time, no worries, I've got
to get off my butt and put my Coldbox contributions up on the Code
Depot. Now if I just got less lazy and blogged, maybe I'd become a
Team Coldbox member :)
Cheers,
Judah
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Adrocknaphobia
wrote:
led at the usefulness of simply clicking a class and being taken to
the corresponding .java file etc.
~Brad
Original Message
Subject: Re: Features (Re: ColdFusion Builder Released!)
From: Adrocknaphobia
Date: Tue, March 23, 2010 4:00 pm
To: cf-talk
Judah,
I already shared yo
Judah,
I already shared you feedback with the CB engineering team _and_ Luis. I'm
very much on board with providing extension points into our parsers. :-)
-Adam
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> That's correct, Adam. Luis has done a great job with the CFB
> extensions
That's correct, Adam. Luis has done a great job with the CFB
extensions for Coldbox as well as some nifty bits for CFE. As a
matter of fact, his CFB extension is the biggest reason I'm tempted to
use CFBuilder. But please look over my suggestion. I really want to
see a CFML IDE that *really* unde
"Stuff that we could have paid developers working on (Adobe), as well
as The Community (us)..."
We have that now in ColdFusion Builder. :-) There are 30 extensions created
by the community already available on RIAForge.
I assume this thread implies that the ideas are in addition to the awesome
C
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> I'm still up for trying to make this happen once I get my current side
> project out the door. I can't stand having to go back and open up all
> my Service objects when I'm in my handler trying to remember what I
> named all of my methods
I'm still up for trying to make this happen once I get my current side
project out the door. I can't stand having to go back and open up all
my Service objects when I'm in my handler trying to remember what I
named all of my methods and what arguments they take. This isn't one
of those areas wher
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 5:10 PM, wrote:
>
> +1 on this feature. I also use ColdBox and autowire most of my objects
> in. I know some things are impossible with a dynamic language like CF,
> but I'd be willing to right click on a variable name in a CFC and
> specify the CFC that it is an instanc
10 matches
Mail list logo
