Yup. Thanks!
At 04:56 PM 4/22/2013, you wrote:
yep that is a generally recommended setup.
don't forget to also set the SPF records for all the domains that will be
sending through that server
and Setup RDNS
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Mik Muller ad...@montaguema.net wrote:
Sorry.
Sorry. Just following up on this idea.
I'm getting a third server, and was planning on having it do only SMPT email
delivery for the websites, which, right now, all totalled probably come to more
like 250,000 a month. I know this isn't a lot, but about 50,000 are released in
a big spurt every
yep that is a generally recommended setup.
don't forget to also set the SPF records for all the domains that will be
sending through that server
and Setup RDNS
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Mik Muller ad...@montaguema.net wrote:
Sorry. Just following up on this idea.
I'm getting a
Test post. Please ignore.
On 4/11/2013 5:03 PM, Justin Scott wrote:
The iis smtp service is ok for absolute no frills, don't care at all what
happens to the emails. But the logging is pretty rubbish, so tracking
down causes of failures is often very hard or impossible.
That hasn't been my
the best tool for delivering large amounts of email from CF.
I saw that Russ Michaels mentioned sendgrid.net in a post a couple days ago
about CFMAIL dropping some emails. This client knows that their needs are going
to grow beyond the 300,000 ($200/mo) limit in a short amount of time, and so
.
The current concept is for me to get another server specifically for their
email delivery, and to move their app to my CF machine and their database to
my SQL machine. With the extra email-only server I get SmarterMail, though
I'm not sure that's the best tool for delivering large amounts of email
specifically for their
email delivery, and to move their app to my CF machine and their database
to my SQL machine. With the extra email-only server I get SmarterMail,
though I'm not sure that's the best tool for delivering large amounts of
email from CF.
I saw that Russ Michaels mentioned
!
http://www.google.com/intl/en/enterprise/apps/business/pricing.html
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Russ Michaels [mailto:r...@michaels.me.uk]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 3:30 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Large amounts of CF email
I would still recommend sendgrid if the emails your
Subject: Re: Large amounts of CF email
I would still recommend sendgrid if the emails your clients send are
important and you want tracking and reporting and bounce processing to make
sure the mails reach their recipients.
You also need to consider spam blacklists,.do you regularly check them to
make
The current concept is for me to get another server specifically
for their email delivery, and to move their app to my CF machine...
First, the volumes of e-mail you're talking about may sound like a
lot, but they're really not. We have CF apps that do close to half a
million messages a day
They send out a little over 100,000 emails a month.
As much as that may sound, it's not a lot of email. Just about any SMTP
server can handle that volume. The real trick is timing. If all 100K go
out at once then you will need to throttle the output not because of server
load but because the
Google Apps is $5 per user per month or $50 per user per year?
And Google defines a user as a distinct email inbox.
Wow, I'm running SmarterMail 11 that came free with my
Virtual Dedicated Server with CF9. Google would cost me
about $500 per month! I can do the extra work for that
kind of
-
From: Russ Michaels [mailto:r...@michaels.me.uk]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 3:30 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Large amounts of CF email
I would still recommend sendgrid if the emails your clients send are
important and you want tracking and reporting and bounce processing to make
sure
: Russ Michaels [mailto:r...@michaels.me.uk]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 3:30 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Large amounts of CF email
I would still recommend sendgrid if the emails your clients send are
important and you want tracking and reporting and bounce processing to make
sure the mails
The iis smtp service is ok for absolute no frills, don't care at all what
happens to the emails.
But the logging is pretty rubbish, so tracking down causes of failures is
often very hard or impossible.
It doesn't compare to smartermail or hmail which are both free to use for
smtp.
Regards
Russ
The iis smtp service is ok for absolute no frills, don't care at all what
happens to the emails. But the logging is pretty rubbish, so tracking
down causes of failures is often very hard or impossible.
That hasn't been my experience, though I agree the logs could use some
improving. I don't
16 matches
Mail list logo
