, 2002 2:52 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: OT: Section 508 Compliancy
Not necessarily the specific portions. It might even comply legally,
but that doesn't meant that it would be easily readable in a screen
reader such as JAWS or Simply Web.
To give an example, use three programs.
Lynx - http
Lynx?
Speech ready Lynx?
drew
-Original Message-
From: Sandy Clark [mailto:slLists;shayna.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 2:52 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: OT: Section 508 Compliancy
Not necessarily the specific portions. It might even comply
legally,
but that doesn't meant
compliant).
-Original Message-
From: Trusz, Andrew [mailto:Andrew.Trusz;ssa.gov]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 8:58 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: OT: Section 508 Compliancy
Your examples suggest that the problem isn't with Lynx but with screen
readers. Lynx cleanly separates form and content
Is there any official certification for section 508 compliancy?
I've been looking around and have found 3rd party consultants that will make
your site compliant.
The only badge I've seen on Web sites is the W3C WGAC label... which is
and isn't the same thing.
I've also seen the Bobby badge
Carlisle, Eric wrote:
Is there any official certification for section 508 compliancy?
I've been looking around and have found 3rd party consultants that
will make your site compliant.
The only badge I've seen on Web sites is the W3C WGAC label...
which is and isn't the same thing.
I've
Sorry Jochem, but that just means it works in Lynx not that it meets all the
508 criteria.
-Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:jochemd;oli.tudelft.nl]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 8:11 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: OT: Section 508 Compliancy
Carlisle
Kevin Graeme wrote:
Sorry Jochem, but that just means it works in Lynx not that it meets
all the 508 criteria.
Which parts of 1194.22 wouldn't it comply with then?
Jochem
~|
Archives:
On Thursday, Nov 7, 2002, at 06:11 US/Pacific, Jochem van Dieten wrote:
Carlisle, Eric wrote:
Is there any official certification for section 508 compliancy?
Rule of the thumb:
if it looks decent in Lynx and is valid HTML, it is compliant.
If only it were that simple! :)
Check out the
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: OT: Section 508 Compliancy
Kevin Graeme wrote:
Sorry Jochem, but that just means it works in Lynx not that it meets
all the 508 criteria.
Which parts of 1194.22 wouldn't it comply with then?
Jochem
All of these are great!
Thanks a lot :-)
-Original Message-
From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:sean;corfield.org]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 1:00 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: OT: Section 508 Compliancy
On Thursday, Nov 7, 2002, at 06:11 US/Pacific, Jochem van Dieten wrote:
Carlisle
10 matches
Mail list logo
