-
From: Candace Cottrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 7:29 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: OT .Net? Java? No Thanks, We'll Take Macromedia Instead
We use PACS here...
Candace K. Cottrell, Web Developer
The Children's Medical Center
One Children's Plaza
Dayt
I've seen the tablets in action. Very spiffy!
-Original Message-
From: Candace Cottrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 10:28 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: OT .Net? Java? No Thanks, We'll Take Macromedia Instead
We have a wireless initiative here. Ou
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 6:29 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: OT .Net? Java? No Thanks, We'll Take Macromedia Instead
One of my doctors is part of a very large group. Every member of the
medical
staff carries around a wireless "clipboard" .. it is really just a
laptop
designed
CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: OT .Net? Java? No Thanks, We'll Take Macromedia
Instead
>
>
>
> As a quick aside, I don't know if I see their product as being overly
> successful in hospitals. It seems that their product is dependent on
> running
> in a browser. Mo
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 6:29 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: OT .Net? Java? No Thanks, We'll Take Macromedia Instead
One of my doctors is part of a very large group. Every member of the medical
staff carries around a wireless "clipboard" .. it is reall
2003 6:58 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: OT .Net? Java? No Thanks, We'll Take Macromedia Instead
>
>
>
> As a quick aside, I don't know if I see their product as being overly
> successful in hospitals. It seems that their product is dependent on
> running
Alright, fine. I'm a nitwit too.
-Kevin
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Carabetta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 9:10 AM
Subject: Re: OT .Net? Java? No Thanks, We'll Take Macromedia Ins
True, he could have been more clear that he was talking about client
technologies...
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 18, 2003 10:00 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: OT .Net? Java? No Thanks, We'll Take Macromedia Instead
Because Flash can
>Because Flash can work just fine with .Net and Java and they're not
>mutually
>exclusive. One is for interface and the others are back end, but that's not
>presented at all in the article. The author does mention that they
>considered ActiveX for the interface, but that's ActiveX not .Net or Java
AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: OT .Net? Java? No Thanks, We'll Take Macromedia Instead
The writer of that article is obviously a nitwit.
-Kevin
- Original Message -
From: "Marius Milosav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: T
- Original Message -----
> > From: "Marius Milosav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 1:18 AM
> > Subject: OT .Net? Java? No Thanks, We'll Take Macromedia Instead
> >
>
>Interesting article:
>
>http://update.internetweek.com/cgi-bin4/DM/y/ecvx0BddvJ0V30B8Mu0AF
>
Well, your subject is misleading because the reality is that the only
technology they didn't use was .NET. They *did* use Java as the back end
server technology (JRun). For interfaces, there's really no
That seems like a vacuous comment, in what fashion do you mean that?
- Calvin
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Graeme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 9:30 AM
Subject: Re: OT .Net? Java? No Thank
The writer of that article is obviously a nitwit.
-Kevin
- Original Message -
From: "Marius Milosav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 1:18 AM
Subject: OT .Net? Java? No Thanks, We'll Take Macro
Interesting article:
http://update.internetweek.com/cgi-bin4/DM/y/ecvx0BddvJ0V30B8Mu0AF
Marius Milosav
www.scorpiosoft.com
It's not about technology, it's about people.
Virtual Company (VICO) Application Demo
www.scorpiosoft.com/vicodemo/login.cfm
~~
15 matches
Mail list logo
