ROFL
>you want your CFLOCK to be as short and quick as possible.
--
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/c
> I'm sure this is a really really stupid question, but, what
> would happen if you wrapped the whole template in CFLOCK?
You'd increase the likelihood that the lock would interfere with another
lock. CFLOCK essentially does something analogous to locking in a database.
When you execute a complex
On 7/14/00, Raymond K. Camden penned:
>It's OK, and in fact, it's better to use one CFLOCK wrap. As for a good
>timeout, I always use 30, but have not heard of a 'good' figure. It probably
>depends on your estimated load.
OK, cool. That will save me a couple minutes anyway. :)
I'm sure this is a
It's OK, and in fact, it's better to use one CFLOCK wrap. As for a good
timeout, I always use 30, but have not heard of a 'good' figure. It probably
depends on your estimated load.
===
Raymond Camden, Cold Fusion Jedi Master for
4 matches
Mail list logo
