Re: AntiSpammy vs http://www.cflib.org/udf.cfm/safetext for preventing XSS

2011-05-20 Thread Pete Freitag
: RE: AntiSpammy vs http://www.cflib.org/udf.cfm/safetext for preventing XSS Anti Samy is brilliant, the way this is used is as a HTML string cleaner. What that means is that you define which configuration type you want, there are predefined configs like Slashdot to name but one. These configs

RE: AntiSpammy vs http://www.cflib.org/udf.cfm/safetext for preventing XSS

2011-05-19 Thread Andrew Scott
Anti Samy is brilliant, the way this is used is as a HTML string cleaner. What that means is that you define which configuration type you want, there are predefined configs like Slashdot to name but one. These configs are fully configurable to the HTML Elements. SlashDot config is what SlashDot

RE: AntiSpammy vs http://www.cflib.org/udf.cfm/safetext for preventing XSS

2011-05-19 Thread Brook Davies
could use a regex to find it, strip it out, then run AntiSammy, then put the GA code back in... Brook -Original Message- From: Andrew Scott [mailto:andr...@andyscott.id.au] Sent: May-19-11 4:56 PM To: cf-talk Subject: RE: AntiSpammy vs http://www.cflib.org/udf.cfm/safetext for preventing XSS